Author Archives: Enurrendy

DDoS Extortionist Copycats Continue To Hound Victims

It has been a while sine I wrote about this subject (or about anything at all for that matter) but, it occurred to me to today that the distributed denial of service (DDoS) extortionist issue is a problem that needs to be talked about again. Over the last couple years there have been a lot of websites come under attack from miscreants armed with all manner of distributed denial of service platforms and tools. Often these attackers would first launch an attack and then contact the victim company to say “check your logs to see we’re for real”. Once their bonafides were established they would then demand a sum of money to be paid in bitcoin or suffer the “wrath” of their DDoS attack that was more often that naught was severely oversold. There have been examples of criminal outfits like DD4BC who were true to their word when they made a threat. They would in fact follow through on their threat of an attack. This came to an unceremonious end a year ago when one of the main ne’er do wells was arrested by Europol. More often than naught however, these extortion gangs turn out to be little more than confidence tricksters. One such example was the Armada Collective. This was a criminal outfit that did little more than threaten targets but, with one lone exception, never followed through on the threats they made. Mind you, they did end up making a tidy sum of money from their victims. What this did accomplish was to set a precedent that has given rise to the copycat attackers. A prime example of this was an in an email that I received from a friend. His organization was threatened by a copycat group that were masquerading as the Armada Collective. Basically using the name as a hex sign. A brand name that could be used to possibly intimidate an organization. Here is a redacted version of the email that he provided to me. From: Armada Collective Sent: Subject: ATTENTION: Ransom request!!! FORWARD THIS MAIL TO WHOEVER IS IMPORTANT IN YOUR COMPANY AND CAN MAKE DECISION! We are Armada Collective. All your servers will be DDoS-ed starting Wednesday (Jun 29 2016) if you don’t pay 5 Bitcoins @ [Bitcoin wallet address redacted] When we say all, we mean all – users will not be able to access sites host with you at all. If you don’t pay by Wednesday, attack will start, price to stop will increase by 5 BTC for every day of attack. If you report this to media and try to get some free publicity by using our name, instead of paying, attack will start permanently and will last for a long time. This is not a joke. Our attacks are extremely powerful – sometimes over 1 Tbps per second. So, no cheap protection will help. Prevent it all with just 5 BTC @ [Bitcoin wallet address redacted] Do not reply, we will probably not read. Pay and we will know its you. AND YOU WILL NEVER AGAIN HEAR FROM US! Bitcoin is anonymous, nobody will ever know you cooperated. While people might not be aware that an organization had in fact cooperated, as per their email, they would be setting a horrible example. The more that companies pay extortionists like this the more emboldened that the criminals would become. This could potentially become a lucrative endeavor for the criminals. At the time of this writing 1 bitcoin was valued at roughly $628 USD. At a bare minimum there would be 5 bitcoin per email above, they would be raking in at least $3000 USD for each successful attack. Not bad for the cost of an email. If you are the recipient of an email like this, seek help to protect your enterprise. Do not feel compelled to pay the attackers. You have no guarantees that they won’t return. Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/davelewis/2016/09/08/ddos-extortionist-copycats-continues-to-hound-victims/#2c6d7a7b4d06

Read this article:
DDoS Extortionist Copycats Continue To Hound Victims

Group claiming to be the Armada Collective threatens DDoS attack

Cybercriminals claiming to be the Armada Collective have sent out extortion emails threatening independent and small businesses with DDoS attacks. A group of cybercriminals which claim to be the infamous Armada Collective are threatening independent and small business websites worldwide with a huge Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, should they fail to pay the bitcoin ransoms requested by email. It is still unclear if these cybercriminals are the real deal or are just pretending to be to scare possible victims into paying a ransom to prevent a DDoS attack that could threaten their businesses. The actual Armada Collective gained infamy last year after extorting money from a number of Swiss firms, several Thai banks and even ProtonMail which provides encrypted webmail. The emails sent out to businesses around the globe inform users that their security is poor and that the group will launch a DDoS attack on their networks using the Cerber ransomware and anywhere from 10-300 Gigabytes per second (Gbps) of attack power. However, anyone who received and email from the group can prevent the attack by paying one bitcoin which is equivalent to $606. If the ransom is not paid before they attack though, the price will go up significantly to 20 bitcoins to put an end to the DDoS attacks. The group has also been kind enough to provide users who are unfamiliar with bitcoin all the information necessary on how to download a personal bitcoin wallet such as Multibit or Xapo. They are also informed on how to set up a bitcoin wallet of their choosing online. It is quite possible that the group’s email demands could be fake and any user who received the email should contact their local authorities, but under no circumstance should they pay the ransom. Source: http://www.itproportal.com/news/group-claiming-to-be-the-armada-collective-threatens-ddos-attacks/

Taken from:
Group claiming to be the Armada Collective threatens DDoS attack

Mirai Linux Trojan corrals IoT devices into DDoS botnets

Mirai, a newly discovered and still poorly detected piece of Linux malware, is being used to rope IoT devices into DDoS botnets. Researchers from MalwareMustDie have recently gotten their hands on several variants of the threat, and have discovered the following things: It comes in the form of an ELF file (typical for executable files in Unix and Unix-like systems) It targets mostly routers, DVR or WebIP cameras, Linux servers, and Internet of Things devices … More ?

Read More:
Mirai Linux Trojan corrals IoT devices into DDoS botnets

Luabot malware used to launch DDoS attacks

A security researcher discovered a Trojan that infects Linux platforms used in distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. According to MalwareMustDie, the security researcher responsible for the discovery, the malware is written in the Lua programming language (version 5.3.0). The malware, dubbed Linux/Luabot, targets the Linux operating system, used often in web servers and Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The Trojan issues botnet commands to affected systems, MalwareMustDie wrote in a blog post published on Monday. “There are plenty new ELF malware coming & lurking our network recently & hitting out Linux layer IoT and services badly,” MalwareMustDie wrote in the blog post. The researcher advised security professionals to “watch for unusual hazards for the security of our 24/7 running Linux nodes.” Last week, security firm Sucuri disclosed vulnerabilities in IoT home routers that were exploited to launch an application-level DDoS attack. The Strider cyberespionage group disclosed by Symantec last month also used modules written in Lua. Source: http://www.scmagazine.com/luabot-malware-used-to-launch-ddos-attacks/article/520814/

View article:
Luabot malware used to launch DDoS attacks

World Of Warcraft: Legion’ Goes Down As Blizzard Servers Hit With DDoS

To commemorate the launch of the latest  World of Warcraft  expansion,  Legion , Blizzard’s servers were taken down by a DDoS (distributed denial of service) attack on Wednesday. This came a day late, as the expansion actually launched on Tuesday. But when it comes to ruining other peoples’ fun, better late than never. This lined up with a similar attack that brought down the  Battlefield 1  open beta for most of the day yesterday, as EA’s servers were hit. The Blizzard attack began in Europe, then spread across the globe. It didn’t just take down  Legion.  Other games, like  Overwatch , were also impacted. This was the second major DDoS attack against Blizzard in August. The last attack hit early in the month, and was apparently retaliation for Blizzard’s banning of cheaters.  How classy. Part of a game developer’s job is to keep legit players around, and a big part of that in multiplayer games is protecting honest players from cheaters. Retaliating against a company for doing its job is absurd. As of now, Blizzard’s servers appear to be working again. Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2016/09/01/world-of-warcraft-legion-goes-down-as-blizzard-servers-hit-with-ddos/#6bfb43ed3778

More:
World Of Warcraft: Legion’ Goes Down As Blizzard Servers Hit With DDoS

Rio 2016 Olympics Suffered Sustained 540Gbps DDoS Attacks

Arbor security claims Rio was a success in terms of mitigating powerful, prolonged DDoS attacks Public facing websites belonging to organisations affiliated with the 2016 Rio Olympics were targeted by sustained, sophisticated DDoS attacks reaching up to 540Gbps, according to Arbor Networks. Many of these attacks started months before the Olympic Games had begun, but the security company said that attackers increased their efforts significantly during the games, generating the longest-duration sustained 500Gbps+ DDoS attack Arbor has ever seen. “And nobody noticed,” boasted Arbor’s Security Engineering and Response Team (ASERT). Virtual battlegrounds Just like other public services like electricity and water, the ins and outs of keeping websites up and running should be hidden from the general public, allowing them to go about their business without knowing about the virtual warfare being engaged behind server lines. And in ASERT’s opinion, the Rio Olympic Games “set the bar for rapid, professional, effective DDoS attack mitigation under the most intense scrutiny of any major international event to date”. “Over the last several months, several organizations affiliated with the Olympics have come under large-scale volumetric DDoS attacks ranging from the tens of gigabits/sec up into the hundreds of gigabits/sec,” blogged ASERT. “A large proportion of the attack volume consisted of UDP reflection/amplification attack vectors such as DNS, chargen, ntp, and SSDP, along with direct UDP packet-flooding, SYN-flooding, and application-layer attacks targeting Web and DNS services. “The defenders of the Rio Olympics’ online presence knew they’d have their work cut out for them, and prepared accordingly. “A massive amount of work was performed prior to the start of the games; understanding all the various servers, services, applications, their network access policies, tuning anomaly-detection metrics in Arbor SP, selecting and configuring situationally-appropriate Arbor TMS DDoS countermeasures, coordinating with the Arbor Cloud team for overlay ‘cloud’ DDoS mitigation services, setting up virtual teams with the appropriate operational personnel from the relevant organisations, ensuring network infrastructure and DNS BCPs were properly implemented, defining communications channels and operational procedures. “And that’s why the 2016 DDoS Olympics were an unqualified success for the defenders! Most DDoS attacks succeed simply due to the unpreparedness of the defenders – and this most definitely wasn’t the case in Rio.” However, not all defence tactics worked surrounding the Olympic Games. The Brazilian arm of hacking collective Anonymous was successful in targeting websites that included the official website of the federal government for the 2016 games and the Brazilian Ministry of Sports. Anonymous was also able to leak personal and financial data belonging to Brazilian sports domains such as the Brazilian Confederation of Boxing and the Brazilian Triathlon Confederation. “Hello Rio de Janeiro. We know that many have realized how harmful it was (and still is) the Olympic Games in the city. The media sells the illusion that the whole city celebrates and commemorate the reception of tourists from all over the world, many of them attracted by the prostitution network and drugs at a bargain price. This false happiness hides the blood shed in the suburbs of the city, mainly in the favelas thanks to countless police raids and military under the pretext of a fake war,” stated Anonymous. “Therefore, we will continue with our operations to unmask the numerous arbitrary actions of those who are state and therefore its own population enemies.” Source: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/security/rio-olympics-ddos-attacks-196998

Excerpt from:
Rio 2016 Olympics Suffered Sustained 540Gbps DDoS Attacks

DOSarrest Expands Into Second City in Asia

DOSarrest Expands Into Second City in Asia VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA–(Marketwired – Aug. 30, 2016) –  DOSarrest Internet Security announced today that they have expanded their DDoS protection cloud in Asia, with a new DDoS mitigation node in Hong Kong. The new node will work in conjunction with their existing nodes in New York, Los Angeles, London, Singapore and Vancouver and will have the same connectivity as the others, including multiple 10 Gb/Sec uplinks to multiple carriers. Mark Teolis, CEO at DOSarrest says, “This new Hong Kong scrubbing center will have excellent connectivity in the region including multiple Chinese upstream providers. To compliment the 6 upstream providers there will be an additional 10Gb/Sec link into the Hong Kong Internet Exchange (HKiX) for even better route diversity. Our customers have asked for it and we are delivering” Teolis adds, “Having great connectivity into China allows us to offer our customers great performance using our caching engine and also more importantly it allows us to stop attacks closer to the source if need be.” Jag Bains, CTO at DOSarrest states, “This new Hong Kong node is part of our global capacity expansion that includes, new hardware in all existing locations, plus the addition of 100+ Gb/Sec of Internet capacity. We need this in order to offer some new services that we will be rolling out in 2017.” About DOSarrest Internet Security: DOSarrest founded in 2007 in Vancouver, B.C., Canada is one of only a couple of companies worldwide to specialize in only cloud based DDoS protection services. Additional Web security services offered are Cloud based  W eb  A pplication  F irewall (WAF) ,  V ulnerability  T esting and  O ptimization  (VTO) as well as  cloud based global load balancing . More information at  www.DOSarrest.com CONTACT INFORMATION Media Contact: Jenny Wong Toll free CAD/US 1-888-818-1344 ext. 205 UK Freephone 0800-016-3099 ext. 205 CR@DOSarrest.com Source: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/-2154179.htm

Read More:
DOSarrest Expands Into Second City in Asia

?The top 5 least-wanted malware in any corporate IT infrastructure

Ask a group of people to define malware, and you’re likely to get a range of different answers. The term has become a catch-all description for a broad collection of different cyber threats that keep IT managers awake at night. Categories falling under the malware banner include viruses and worms, adware, bots, Trojans and root kits. Each category is different but all can cause disruption and loss if not detected and quickly removed. Of the malware types in the wild, the top five are: 1. Remote Access Trojans (RATs) RATS comprise malicious code that usually arrives hidden in an email attachment or as part of a downloaded file such as a game. Once the file is open, the RAT installs itself on the victim’s computer where it can sit unnoticed until being remotely trigged. RATs provide attackers with a back door that gives them administrative control over the target computer. This can then be used to steal data files, access other computers on the network or cause disruption to business processes. One of the first examples, dubbed Beast, first appeared in the early 2000s. It was able to kill running anti-virus software and install a key logger that could monitor for password and credit card details. Sometimes it would even take a photo using the target computer’s web cam and send it back to the attacker. 2. Botnets Some liken botnets to a computerised ‘zombie army’ as they comprise a group of computers that have been infected by a backdoor Trojan. Botnets have similar features to a RAT, however their key difference is that they are a group of computers being controlled at the same time. Botnets have been described as a Swiss Army knife for attackers. Linked to a command-and-control channel, they can be instructed to forward transmissions including spam or viruses to other computers in the internet. They can also be used to initiate distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks similar to the one suspected to have disrupted the Australian census. Some attackers even rent their botnets out to other criminals who want to distribute their own malware or cause problems for legitimate websites or services. 3. Browser-based malware This type of malware targets a user’s web browser and involves the installation of a Trojan capable of modifying web transactions as they occur in real time. The benefit for malware of being in a browser is that it enables it to avoid certain types of security protection such as packet sniffing. Some examples of the malware generate fake pop-up windows when they know a user is visiting a banking web site. The windows request credit card details and passwords which are then sent back to the attacker. Security experts estimate that there have been around 50 million hosts infected by browser-based malware and estimated financial losses have topped $1 billion. 4. Point-of-sale (POS) Malware This is a specialised type of malware that seeks out computers specifically used for taking payments in retail outlets. The malware is designed to infect the computer to which POS terminals are attached and monitor it for credit card details. One example, called Backoff, appeared in late 2013 and managed to infect more than 1000 businesses including the large US-based retailer Dairy Queen. 5. Ransomware This category of malware is designed to take over a computer and make it or the data stored on it unusable. The code usually encrypts data and then the attacker demands payment from the user before providing the encryption key. One of the more prevalent ransomware versions is called Locky and appeared in early 2016. It has already infected a large number of individuals, companies and public facilities such as hospitals. While early examples used poor encryption techniques, ransomware has quickly evolved to the point where many varieties now use industry-standard 256-bit encryption which is effectively impossible to crack without the private key. The best anti-malware steps to take While the impact of a malware infection can be significant for individuals or an organisations, there are steps that can be taken to reduce the likelihood of infection. They include: General awareness It’s important for users to be aware of the threats that malware brings. Staff should be educated about phishing attacks and to be cautious when downloading files or opening attachments from unfamiliar parties. Regular backups Regular back-ups of critical data are a vital part of any security strategy. In larger organisations, a global share drive can be created in which all important files should be stored. This drive can then be backed up as often as is needed. Copies of backups should also be kept offline as an additional layer of protection.   Defence in depth In a complex IT infrastructure, there should be multiple layers of security designed to stop attacks. While no single defence can protect completely, creating a defence in depth strategy will ensure systems and data are as secure as they can be. Layered protection should range from firewalls and anti-virus software through to network intrusion and advanced persistent threat tools. By taking a comprehensive and multi-layered approach to security, organisations can reduce the likelihood they will fall victim to malware attacks and avoid the disruptive and potentially costly problems they can cause. Source: http://www.cso.com.au/article/605901/top-5-least-wanted-malware-any-corporate-it-infrastructure/

View original post here:
?The top 5 least-wanted malware in any corporate IT infrastructure

DNSSEC: Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water

A recent report raiseed concerns about the abuse of DNSSEC to conduct DDoS attacks. The article reported that DNSSEC-signed domains can be used to conduct reflected DDoS attacks with large amplification factors (averaging 28.9x in their study) that could potentially cripple victim servers. The report went on to recommend that organizations deploying DNSSEC should configure their DNS servers to prevent this and other types of abuse. While this report presents some useful information about the … More ?

See more here:
DNSSEC: Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water

Attacks increase as a result of DDoS-for-hire services

DDoS attacks have increased in frequency, scale and complexity over the past year, driven by DDoS-for-hire services, according to a new report. DDoS-for-hire services have caused attacks to become more affordable by enabling unsophisticated threat actors to launch attacks, stated Imperva’s DDoS Threat Landscape Report 2015-2016. The proliferation of these services, also known as “stressers” and “booters,” accounted for an increase in the number of DDoS attacks from 63.8 percent in Q2 2015 to 93 percent in Q1 2016. The U.S. and U.K. are the most frequently targeted countries in DDoS attacks, the report said. In speaking to SCMagazine.com on Thursday, Tim Matthews, vice president of marketing at Imperva Incapsula, said it has become inexpensive to mount DDoS attacks as these kits become “readily available,” creating a “perverse economic ecosystem.” Other security pros have noticed a similar trend. Maxim Goncharov, security researcher at Shape, wrote in an email to SCMagazine.com on Thursday that in the underground community, there are “literally thousands of offers from DDoS professionals.” While a 100-plus GB DDoS attack was virtually unheard of just 18 months ago, attacks of that magnitude are no launched by large scale botnets, according to Tom Kellermann, CEO at Strategic Cyber Ventures. “Mitigation through content delivery and ISP is key here,” wrote Kellermann, formerly CISO of Trend Micro, in an email to SCMagazine.com. Allison Nixon, director of security research at Flashpoint, noted in an email to SCMagazine.com on Thursday that her firm has seen a rise in DDoS-as-a-service in recent years, both in number of services and the power of their attacks. “The problem is that these DDoS services are getting more powerful, and these attacks cause a lot of collateral damage,” she wrote. “Unfortunately, due to the widespread availability of DDoS power, many businesses are learning that purchasing DDoS protection is a requirement to engage in commerce.” Imperva’s Matthews said there has been an uptick in job postings that require technical skills and experience countering these attacks. The rise in DDoS-as-service attacks has become a significant concern for law enforcement, according to William MacArthur, threat intelligence analyst at RiskIQ. The adoption of IPv6 mixed with normal traffic protocol patterns is a method used by attackers that the “current hardware in use in most places of business is not ready to handle,” he wrote in an email to SCMagazine.com on Thursday. Michael Covington, VP product, Wandera, noted that the increase in sophisticated DDoS attacks causes secondary challenges for organizations. “In many situations, a DDoS attack is just a smokescreen for something else the malicious actor is trying to accomplish, whether it involves installing malware, exfiltrating sensitive data or attacking an associate of the target,” he wrote to this publication. Yogesh Amle, managing director and head of software at Union Square Advisors, agreed, noting that DDoS “is one of the most prevalent and common tactics used by cyberterrorists.” However, he also informed this publication that DDoS attacks are increasingly used to distract businesses. He called DDoS the “gateway” to a bigger prize. Amle noted that the rise of the DDoS-as-a-service model is an example of a “dark economy” emerging on the internet. “With money to be made, amateurs and sophisticated hackers are jumping into the fray,” he said. Source: http://www.scmagazine.com/attacks-increase-as-a-result-of-ddos-for-hire-services/article/518544/

Originally posted here:
Attacks increase as a result of DDoS-for-hire services