Category Archives: DDoS Criminals

Notorious pro-US hacker Jester diverts DoS attack towards Israeli spy service Mossad

A high-profile US hacker has turned an attack on his website into an assault against the Israeli intelligence service. ‘The Jester’ – or th3j35t3r – claims that he diverted an attempt to overload his website to assault Mossad’s online presence. Haaretz reported that Jester’s website – jesterscourt.cc – was the victim of a denial of service (DoS) attack on the night of 1 April. In a tweet, Jester announced that he had diverted the hacker’s attack by simply changing the IP address his website was registered on. When asked why he picked Mossad by one of his 74,400 Twitter followers, Jester replied “Because they can look after themselves perfectly well.” On his blog, Jester claims to have used this technique before. In a post called Offensive Counter Measures – Be Like Water, Jester details the steps he took to divert another DoS attack, which he alleges was carried out by Anonymous, towards websites linked with the Occupy movement. According to Haaratz, Israel’s Information and Communications Technology Authority said Mossad’s website had not seen any irregularities or disruptions of service. At the time of writing, Mossad’s website was working, but IBTimes UK could not confirm whether it had suffered any downtime. However, The Jester’s website was not working. Anti-ISIS, anti-Anonymous Jester is one of the hacking community’s most high-profile members. What is a DoS attack? During a denial of service (DoS) or a distributed denial of service (DoS) attack, hackers attempt to overload a website’s connections by sending in data requests from multiple sources. Most often hackers use a ‘botnet’ – internet-connected PCs that are compromised by malware – to send in the requests to visit the site, without the users’ knowledge. The huge number of requests, which can reach thousands per second, overload the ability of a website’s server to respond, eventually causing an error message to appear instead of the site’s pages. Making a DDoS is relatively simple. Botnets are available to hire on websites not reachable via search engines (deep web) or on encrypted websites (the dark web). Jester’s career as a vigilante hacker appears to have started in 2010, when he claimed to have been involved in an attack on the Wikileaks website. That year, the New York Times reported Jester was a a former military contractor who had worked with US special forces. Since then, Jester has developed a reputation as a pro-US hacker vigilante and cybersecurity expert. Through writing his own blog on cybersecurity, he gives talks on the subject through text chat to keep his identity a secret, and is known for attacking websites linked to Hamas and Islamic State (Isis). Jester has also attacked websites used by the Occupy movement and Anonymous – whom he described as “pathetic terrorist sympathizing buttholes”. He claims to have caused more than 180 websites to go offline since 2010. Jester was listed as one of Time magazine’s “most influential people on the internet” in March 2015. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/notorious-pro-us-hacker-jester-diverts-dos-attack-towards-israeli-spy-service-mossad-1552895

Link:
Notorious pro-US hacker Jester diverts DoS attack towards Israeli spy service Mossad

The Anonymous ‘war’ on Donald Trump is a complete disaster

The “total war” that Anonymous declared earlier this month against Donald Trump has quickly devolved into a civil war among hackers fighting within the group and pro-Trump supporters who are trolling them within their chat rooms. In early March, hackers affiliated with Anonymous tried to reboot their Operation Trump campaign by calling for everyone to take down Trump’s websites in a coordinated effort on April 1. Almost immediately, the initiative was criticized by people within Anonymous as irresponsible and “cringeworthy,” but a dedicated group apparently moved on with the plan. It’s April 1: Many of the GOP frontrunner’s sites are still standing, there are now two competing OpTrump chat rooms with totally different missions, and one of them has been flooded with pro-Trump supporters and others leaving trolling comments like “Hitler did nothing wrong.” In short: The so-called war seems to be a complete disaster. ‘A mess is happening’ It’s unclear when the split between Anonymous factions occurred, but it seems to have happened sometime after a hacker named Beemsee, who has been leading the original OpTrump effort, released a new statement claiming that attacking Trump’s websites was all a ruse for publicity around April Fools’ Day. “There is no DDoS,” Beemsee and two other hackers wrote, using the acronym for a distributed denial-of-service attack, a tactic used to overload a website. “It’s only purpose was to gain attention, which this Operation needs. … the point of this Operation is not to attack Donald Trump. Instead, it is going to try to give citizens some insight.” Beemsee and their cohorts say in their statement that people should try and capture “the darker nature of Trump’s supporters” and post it on social media sites with hashtags like #OpTrump and #Trump2016. But a hacker called AnonymousLoyalist disagreed. In a competing statement, the hacker wrote that they moved to a “far more organized channel, which has already seen unsurprisingly large amounts of success.” That channel is #OpTrump2016, but it was unclear exactly what that success boiled down to. When Tech Insider viewed the #OpTrump2016 chat room on Friday, it was an unorganized mess. Most Anonymous chat rooms are moderated in some way, and people usually get kicked out for spamming or posting nonsense. But it appeared to be flooded with trolls intent on calling them children, “social justice warriors,” and, more often than not, homophobic slurs. “A mess is happening,” wrote one user in #OpTrump, expressing a shared frustration among others in Beemsee’s chat room. The ‘war’ goes on It was clear on Friday that at least some of Trump’s websites were indeed under cyberattack. The website CitizensForTrump.com is currently unreachable, and the site for Trump’s hotels brought up an error for a few seconds before pulling up a cached version powered by CloudFlare, a service that protects from attacks like this. Anonymous may be able to bring down some of Trump’s unprotected websites, but it will almost certainly come back online after a few hours or days. And many of his other sites are probably not at risk at all, since Tech Insider previously spoke with CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince, and he wasn’t particularly worried. “DDoS attacks are not particularly sophisticated cyber attacks,” Prince said. “They are sort of the functional equivalent of a caveman with a club.” A representative for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Tech Insider, but spokeswoman Hope Hicks previously told Tech Insider: “The government and law-enforcement authorities are seeking the arrest of the people responsible for attempting to illegally hack Mr. Trump’s accounts and telephone information.” Depending on who you believe in Anonymous, the plan is a coordinated DDoS attack or a social-media shaming campaign against Trump’s supporters. But Beemsee left open the possibility of something else, perhaps an actual way to take over one of their targeted websites — which the hacker collective has been scanning for vulnerabilities since the beginning. “This is NOT the last time you hear of this operation,” Beemsee wrote. “We will be watching, and will act when the time is right.” Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/anonymous-war-donald-trump-fail-2016-4

Excerpt from:
The Anonymous ‘war’ on Donald Trump is a complete disaster

Bitcoin Startup Quits Operation Due to Never-Ending DDoS Attacks

Bitcoin’s Secure Wallet Service Coinkite Inc. Closing Down due to never-ending DDoS Attacks and Governmental Nagging Bitcoin exchanges around the world face cyber attacks every now and then, some owners give up while some fight back . In the case of Bitcoin startup Coinkite Inc., it is now officially announced that its secure wallet service, which started in 2012, will be closed within the next 30 days. It has also been made clear that customers must withdraw funds from their wallets by the end of this period. If any of the users fail to do so then their Bitcoin will be automatically credited to them. Prior to closing down all of the services, its TOR accessibility and application program interface of Coinkite will be closed for 14 days while their annual pre-paid plans’ prorated balances will continue to be refunded. The startup was under DDoS attacks for last three years The company now aims to focus upon hardware-oriented products such as the upcoming physical Bitcoin project Opendime. It will be a full-fledged standalone Bitcoin terminal or hardware wallet that will be equipped with a printer as well as QR scanner. Moreover, the company will be focusing upon hardware products for security optimization and authentication, all-purpose standalone Bitcoin solutions and services for hosting Bitcoin hot wallets. Since its inception, Coinkite was marketed as the most convenient and secure way to accept and exchange Bitcoin, the digital currency. The company claimed that it provided users the world’s “most advanced web wallet system.” It was considered a system that empowered customers and merchants to “BUY, SELL, ACCEPT and STORE Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies, in both the online and physical worlds.” Why is Coinkite Closing the Secure Wallet Service NOW? The decision apparently is the outcome of the constant harassment that the online Bitcoin wallet service has been dealing with. In a blog post , it was revealed by the company that they had been receiving Distributed Denial of Service or DDoS attacks constantly over the past three years. They also have become tired of the attempts by governmental agencies for interrupting into their clients’ privacy. The CEO of the company Rodolfo Novak told CoinDesk that they wanted to shift their focus from software to hardware because their meager resources were being drained further by the “bullshit” that they have been experiencing. “We want to write software, not deal with lawyers and DDoSing…One of the main issues with SaaS is all the free users and need support and we want to provide good support. All these things have costs,” clarified Novak. Source: https://www.hackread.com/bitcoin-exchange-ddos-attacks/

View article:
Bitcoin Startup Quits Operation Due to Never-Ending DDoS Attacks

DNS root server attack was not aimed at root servers – infosec bods

Target appears to have been two Chinese domain names The internet’s root servers were not the target of a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in December which for a short time took out four of the 13 pillars of the global network.…

More here:
DNS root server attack was not aimed at root servers – infosec bods

University of Georgia hit by DDoS Attack

The University of Georgia was the victim of a cyberattack Sunday night which blocked all Internet access for everyone on campus using the school’s network. The DDoS — distributed denial of service — attack came from outside UGA’s network, and began about 6:10 p.m., according to an email sent Monday by Timothy Chester, UGA’s vice president for information technology. A DDoS attack floods a target’s computer network with traffic, leaving the victim’s use of its websites and computer systems unavailable. During the incident, the university’s entire 20 gigabytes per second of Internet capacity was saturated with outside network traffic, which blocked access campus users.   UGA purchases its Internet connectivity through a nonprofit consortium, called Southern Crossroads, which is operated by Georgia Tech. School officials worked with Southern Crossroads to isolate the attack and began blocking it about 10 p.m., Chester’s message said. The attack ended shortly after that. As of Monday morning, officials had found no evidence that systems or data maintained by UGA had been compromised. Colleges and universities have increasingly been the target of these types of cyberattacks. Last year, Rutgers University students requested tuition refunds after the school experienced its fifth DDoS attack in a year. Arizona State University was also hit by a DDoS attack in April, blocking access to its Internet network a week before final exams. Some campuses are not currently equipped to identify DDoS attacks, and may not have a method for effectively mitigating them, industry experts say. “I personally regret that many of you experienced a disruption as you were preparing homework, getting ready for class or doing other University work and I offer my apologies,” Chester said to the campus community in the message. UGA plans to review the incident with federal, state and local law enforcement, and work with the University System of Georgia on reducing the risks of these types of attacks in the future.   Source: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local-education/university-of-georgia-hit-by-cyberattack/nqtN9/

Read the original post:
University of Georgia hit by DDoS Attack

7 Iranians indicted for cyber attacks on US banks and a dam

The US Justice Department unsealed on Thursday an indictment charging seven Iranian computer specialists for conducting a coordinated campaign of distributed denial of service attacks against 46 major companies, primarily in the US financial sector, from late 2011 through mid-2013. The individuals – Ahmad Fathi; Hamid Firoozi; Amin Shokohi; Sadegh Ahmadzadegan, a/k/a Nitr0jen26; Omid Ghaffarinia, a/k/a PLuS; Sina Keissar; and Nader Saedi, a/k/a Turk Server – were employed by two Iran-based computer companies, ITSecTeam and … More ?

View article:
7 Iranians indicted for cyber attacks on US banks and a dam

D.O.J. Charges Iran-Sponsored Hackers with Dozens of DDoS Attacks on Major Financial Institutions

No less than 46 U.S. financial institutions, as well as a dam in New York, were allegedly targeted. On Thursday morning, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment against seven Iranian citizens allegedly funded by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, accusing them of launching a coordinated cyber-attack against a minimum of 46 American financial institutions, as well as a major New York dam. In a press conference with some of American law enforcement’s heaviest hitters, including F.B.I. director James Comey and U.S. district attorney Preet Bharara , Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that members of two Iran-based computer companies, ITSecTeam and the Mersad Company, had launched coordinated distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks against the Web sites of dozens of financial institutions, including the New York Stock Exchange, Bank of America, Capital One, ING, and AT&T, disabling them and preventing their customers from accessing their accounts. In addition, one of the alleged hackers, Hamid Firoozi , was said to have illegally accessed a computer in charge of the Bowman Dam in Rye, New York, giving him the ability to remotely control its operations and potentially cause “a threat to public health or safety.” According to the Department of Justice, the two groups received funding from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, the elite government militia tasked with defending Islamic law in Iran. Lynch said in a statement that the attacks not only cost these companies “tens of millions of dollars” to restore their Web sites, but highlighted how foreign cyber-attacks have become a major threat to U.S. national security. “In unsealing this indictment, the Department of Justice is sending a powerful message: that we will not allow any individual, group, or nation to sabotage American financial institutions or undermine the integrity of fair competition in the operation of the free market,” she said in the prepared statement. According to the indictment, the DDoS attacks took place over 176 days between 2011 and 2013. The attacks on U.S. targets took place after Iran’s nuclear capabilities were sabotaged by the Stuxnet virus, believed to have been a joint effort between the U.S. and Israeli governments, in mid-2010.   The indictment also comes after a series of high-profile cyber-attacks on the United States government. In 2014 alone, the government experienced more than 61,000 attacks on their computer systems, affecting several administrative agencies such as the State Department, the Energy Department, and the White House. Last year, the Office of Personnel Management (O.P.M.) was the target of the largest attack to date, in which Chinese hackers stole sensitive personal information from 21.5 million past and present government employees. During the press conference Thursday morning, Comey said that the indictment was meant to show the world that the U.S. government was ready to respond to foreign-based cyber-attacks, no matter where they came from or the scale of the attack. “By calling out the individuals and nations who use cyber-attacks to threaten American enterprise, as we have done in this indictment, we will change behavior,” he said.   Source: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/03/doj-iran-hacker-indictment

See more here:
D.O.J. Charges Iran-Sponsored Hackers with Dozens of DDoS Attacks on Major Financial Institutions

US charges Iranians with hacking into an NY dam, blasting banks offline

Alleged cyber-crims unleashed 140Gbps of duff packets at networks The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has charged seven Iranian hackers over a string of high-profile distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against banks.…

See the article here:
US charges Iranians with hacking into an NY dam, blasting banks offline

Change.org Victim of DDoS Attack From China

Change.org, an online petitioning platform, has appear beneath an advancing broadcast abnegation of account (DDoS) advance basic from China afterwards the website hosted a alarm advancement Chinese authorities to absolution artisan Ai Weiwei from custody. The attacks, which started backward Sunday, accept about brought down the site, according to Change.org architect Ben Rattray. DDoS attacks plan by application hundreds or bags of afraid computers to forward cartage to a website, cutting it with abstracts so it becomes aloof to accustomed users. Change.org said the accepted advance originates from an accretion accumulation of computers primarily based in China, and has yet to stop. This is the aboriginal time the website has been hit with a DDoS attack. Change.org has been hosting a online address calling for the absolution of Chinese artisan Ai Weiwei, who is currently beneath arrest. The address has admiring about 100,000 humans from 175 countries, authoritative it one of Change.org’s a lot of acknowledged all-embracing campaigns, Rattray said. “It’s appealing bright the advance is in acknowledgment to the campaign,” he added. “It’s amazing that somebody in China with a high-level of abstruse composure can appulse the adeptness for humans about the apple to organize.” The online alarm coincided with demonstrations beyond the apple this accomplished Sunday, which aswell alleged for the artist’s release. Ai, who is aswell accepted for his activism, has been bedfast as allotment of a Chinese government crackdown on political dissidents in the country. Authorities in the country accept arrested added animal rights activists and clamped down on the advice flow, afterward antecedent online postings that began in February calling for a “Jasmine revolution” adjoin the Chinese government. Change.org is currently blocked in China. Internet censors in the country consistently block sites that are accounted to politically sensitive. Despite the block, the computers complex in the DDoS advance are managing to acquisition a way about the country’s civic Internet firewall, said Rattray. In the past, added sites accept been the victims of cyber attacks advancing from China. This March, blog publishing belvedere WordPress.com aswell reported getting hit with a DDoS attack basic from China. Chinese hackers accept aswell allegedly launched cyber attacks to steal abstracts from adopted activity accompanies, according to aegis bell-ringer McAfee. In 2009, Google was aswell the victim of an advance basic from China that was aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of animal rights activists The Chinese government has ahead responded to these letters by abstinent it is complex in any cyberattacks, abacus that China has aswell been a victim of hacking attempts. The accurate antecedent of DDoS attacks is generally unclear. Although Change.org has traced the accepted advance to servers in China, it is aswell accessible the computers are beneath the ascendancy of hackers based in addition country. Change.org letters that both the FBI and U.S. State Department are searching into the DDoS attack. “We will not stop or yield down annihilation because of this DDoS attack,” Rattray said. “We accept in the axiological appropriate of the humans to adapt about issues they affliction about it.” Source: http://webtechreview.com/change-org-victim-of-ddos-attack-from-china/

Continue reading here:
Change.org Victim of DDoS Attack From China

Malware Botnet Can Be Abused to Launch DDoS Attacks

DDoS attacks can have an amplification factor of 26.5 An independent security researcher that goes by the name of MalwareTech has discovered a way in which he could abuse the ZeroAccess malware’s botnet to launch reflection DDoS attacks with an above-average amplification factor. ZeroAccess is a trojan that infects Windows computers and then starts communication with a C&C (command and control), which in turn tells the trojan to download various types of other, more dangerous malware, usually clickfraud bots or Bitcoin mining software, operating hidden from the user’s view. The ZeroAccess botnet appeared in 2011, and because of an effective rootkit component and P2P-like structure, it even managed to survive a takedown attempt orchestrated by Microsoft in December 2013. ZeroAccess botnet used for amplifying DDoS attacks MalwareTech discovered that ZeroAccess allowed its bots to relay messages from one to another, some acting like smaller servers (supernodes) while the rest were just end-points (workers). To relay orders from the C&C server to supernodes and workers, ZeroAccess used simple UDP packets. Because of its complex mesh structure, when a UDP packet arrived at a supernode, the bot would add more information to the packet, containing various details about the network’s structure. The supernode would add 408 bytes on top of the original 16, for a total of 242 bytes. Since UDP packets can have their destination address spoofed, an attacker that managed to map ZeroAccess’ bot network would be able to send UDP packets to its bots, some of which would then amplify the traffic by 26.5, sending it back to the spoofed destination (the victim’s IP). This scenario is your typical reflection DDoS attack , carrying a 26.5 amplification factor, which is more than double the typical 2-10 amplification factor seen in other types of reflection DDoS attacks. DDoS attacks worked even if bots were behind NATs Theoretically, this wouldn’t have been a problem, since most bots infect users that are sitting behind NATs (Network Address Translation), software programs that translate public IPs to private IP addresses, in order to maximize IPv4 address space usage. That meant that a vast majority of the ZeroAccess botnet wouldn’t have been accessible to a person carrying DDoS attacks via this technique. Unfortunately, MalwareTech found a way around this issue as well, allowing him to involve ZeroAccess supernode bots into DDoS attacks even if sitting behind a router. All of this is only theoretical since the researcher did not want to commit a crime just to test out his theory. Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/malware-botnet-can-be-abused-to-launch-ddos-attacks-501869.shtml

See the original post:
Malware Botnet Can Be Abused to Launch DDoS Attacks