Category Archives: DDoS News

Global mobile deep packet inspection market explodes

The global mobile deep packet inspection (DPI) market will grow at an impressive CAGR of almost 22% until 2020, according to Technavio. Stateful packet inspection Stateful packet inspection (SPI), also known as shallow packet inspection technology, was widely used for detecting abnormal packets by inspecting the packet headers only. SPI was not able to detect many new network attacks such as network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) evasion and distributed denial of service. Thus, DPI became … More ?

Excerpt from:
Global mobile deep packet inspection market explodes

“The amount of traffic, or bandwidth, that is able to be generated and used as a weapon is at an all-time high.,” said one expert.

The company measured threats faced by its customers during a roughly one-year time period, seeing a 211 percent year-over-year increase in attacks. More commonly known as DDoS attacks, they are designed to flood servers with artificial internet traffic that causes access interruption to websites or network systems. The firm largely attributed this apparent growth to the establishment of several botnet operations — which serve as a platform to automate and increase attack volume — and malicious actors’ ability to access greater bandwidth to help generate and use such weapons. Dark Web dealers are using these botnets, according to Imperva, to offer more effective cyber tools to would-be customers. “The amount of traffic, or bandwidth, that is able to be generated and used as a weapon is at an all-time high. This is likely the result of more compromised machines with higher bandwidth,” Imperva Vice President Tim Matthews told FedScoop. In short, hackers are able to launch denial of service attacks by manipulating a hosting provider to re-route IP addresses towards a preferred server. Those DDoS attacks recorded by Imperva — recorded between March 2015 and April 2016 — targeted a diverse range of clients. Even so, all of the attacks similarly aimed to disrupt each organization’s digital operations at one of two distinct levels: application or network. To be clear, an application-based DDoS effectively works to discontinue online access to a specific property, like a website or software service, rather than an entire network. Because app-based DDoS attacks are by nature less expansive, they typically leverage less traffic. In the past, DDoS-ing an entire network has presented a challenge for hackers due to the sheer artificial traffic required to pull it off. But Imperva’s new report suggests that botnets are significantly changing this dynamic; making it easier for individual operations to disrupt larger segments of the internet. Another worrisome trend in the DDoS arena, spotted by Imperva, is that when a target gets hit once, it should prepare for another wave. Data shows that 40 percent of affected targets were attacked more than once, while 16 percent were targeted more than five times. In the past, DDoS attacks have been used to distract an organization from a more malicious data breach, leading to the possible exfiltration of valuable data like customer finances and personal records. Here’s what a DDoS looks like via a data visualization by cybersecurity firm Norse : Source: http://fedscoop.com/ddos-attacks-up-211-percent-august-2016

Read the article:
“The amount of traffic, or bandwidth, that is able to be generated and used as a weapon is at an all-time high.,” said one expert.

Teen hacker walks free after carrying out DDoS attacks on bank and e-crime portal

Australian teenager who DDoSed E-crime website, Commonwealth Bank and his own school, walks free This teen did something and got away with it! Seldom do you see anyone walking away free after creating online mayhem through DDoS attacks but this teen did just that. A 15-year-old teenage hacker was sentenced to a “family conference” by a judge at the Christies Beach Youth Court in Adelaide, Australia after he targeted Australian Cybercrime Online Reporting Network (ACORN) Portal, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and his own school servers in February 2016. In Australian law, a family conference is when the court leaves the punishment to the family and a supervising youth police officer, who must agree with the punishment in order to consider the matter closed. Family conferences may require the teen to apologize publicly, pay compensation to the victims, perform a number of hours of community service, or more. The youth, who cannot be identified under state law, pleaded guilty to four counts of unauthorised damage of computer systems related to Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. However, the very next day, he walked free as the court ordered mediation between his family and victims rather than facing jail time. The teenager was fortunate for not having to face prison time up to 3 years in youth detention under cyber terrorism laws in Australia, as he is not an adult. “The penalty for orchestrating a DDoS attack is a maximum of 10 years imprisonment. This is found in the Cybercrime Act 2001, section 477.3 ‘unauthorised impairment of electronic communication.’” The teenager started his DDoS spree on February 26 when he first attacked CBA that left the bank and some overseas customers unable to access services for more than three hours. The attack “had the potential to cause serious disruption to our services”, says the bank, even though customer money and information was not put at risk. Later in March, he used his mobile phone in March to disrupt his high school’s information technology systems for “fun” and because he was “bored” in computing studies. Later, the teenager shifted the attacks from the school’s system to its Internet provider. On April 4, 2016, he launched another attack on the ACORN website, which is used by every Australian police force and multiple federal crime fighting agencies, was shut down for up to six minutes but abandoned later. He was arrested at his southern Adelaide home after both state and federal authorities tracked his unique internet protocol (IP) address. His school principal reported his crimes through ACORN. Magistrate Cathy Deland, herself a CBA customer, confessed that she was “making a big step” ordering a “family conference” — a move supported by police — but said the law need to concentrate on rehabilitation, reports Adelaide Now. She believed that he was unlikely to reoffend and had not demanded any “ransom”. Ms Deland said his crimes stopped classmates from learning while his attack on the CBA was “just massive”. She told him: “I don’t know that anyone would be able to put a price on repairing the disruption that you caused. I have no doubt it would have been millions of dollars. “I have no doubt that you would not have thought much about the consequences. I am in the difficult situation having to weigh up your incredible stupidity against … your rehabilitation.” The boy and his family refused to comment outside court. Source: http://www.techworm.net/2016/08/teen-hacker-walks-free-carrying-ddos-attacks-bank-e-crime-portal.html

Follow this link:
Teen hacker walks free after carrying out DDoS attacks on bank and e-crime portal

What You Need to Know about the Evolution of DDoS

In an attempt to define the modern-day DDoS attack, one must understand – there is more than one type of attack. Starting with the simplest first,  network level  DDoS attacks are the easiest to launch. They are fundamentally designed to crush networks and melt down firewalls. Aimed at filling state tables and consuming the available resources of network gear, today hackers require larger and larger botnets to be successful. As organizations install bigger pipes and improve their router, firewall, and switch capacity, this type of attack is becoming less effective.  Also, due to law enforcement taking notice of the larger botnets required to be successful, attackers had to devise a better tactic. Hence, the birth of the  reflective/amplified  attack. Using open DNS, NTP, and now UPnP devices located all over the Internet, attackers have learned how to amplify their attacks, and today they’re capable of filling large numbers of 10 Gbps pipes; using botnets of only a few-thousand machines. Firewall state tables and network resources are often not consumed in this case. Instead, pipes are filled with more traffic than they can forward. Packets can only travel so fast down a wire and when they backup, outages and latency ensue. It’s not the case of more packets; it’s the case of bigger packets. As a result of the amplification factor achieved, these attacks are now being  fragmented  as well. Too many fragmented packets are often a death sentence for devices performing deep packet inspection, like next-generation firewalls and IPS. Attackers can flood them with an excessive amount of fragments, consuming vast amounts of CPU, and these devices often melt down in no time at all. Even the highest performing next-generation firewalls and IPS will feel the effects of this type of attack. From an attacker perspective, interweave repetitive  application-layer  attacks designed to consume resources on servers, and you’ve got a recipe for success. Pound the final nail in the coffin by adding  specially crafted packet  attacks designed to take advantage of weak coding, and simply put – anyone will go offline without the right defenses. Attackers today use all five categories simultaneously, making it even harder to defeat without blocking vast amounts of good traffic. However, DDoS attacks are not always about bringing organizations offline. Today’s attackers are launching short-duration, partially saturating attacks that are intended to NOT take the victim offline. Instead, they’re designed to consume time, attention, “people” resources, and log storage. If the average enterprise had to choose between suffering from a DDoS attack or a data breach – they’d likely choose a DDoS attack – taking comfort in the fact that their most valuable information would remain intact, and out of the hands of a hacker. However, DDoS is all about hiding other attacks, and your data is the true target. DDoS is a serious threat – one that has vastly evolved from the simple, easily resolved attacks of the past. Often overlooked as a nuisance, any DDoS activity should raise a red flag for IT departments. When an attack lasts for a few hours (or even a few minutes), most organizations believe the attacker got tired, gave up, or the victim’s defenses withstood the onslaught. The misconception here is a sense of invincibility. However, the real reason the DDoS attack may have subsided is because the attacker achieved their objective – access to your data. Often attackers are targeting your data the whole time, while leading many to believe they’re trying to take organizations offline. Frequently, this is not their intention at all. This is emphasized by the recent rise in Dark DDoS attacks that act as a distraction to the IT department – while a damaging hack is enacted and data is stolen. If businesses are too complacent about DDoS protection, they can be financially ruined due to brand damage and the immediate decrease in customer confidence they often experience – as a result of an attack. This leads some to the point of no return. Often hidden by the Dark DDoS attack, the losses associated with the compromise of proprietary data ends up costing more to mitigate, than the attack itself. It is quite the vicious cycle. The most targeted organizations are obviously those who thrive on Internet availability, or gain the attention of hacking groups like Anonymous. Finance, news, social networks, e-retail, hospitality, education, gaming, insurance, government services, etc. are all seriously impacted by an outage. These organizations almost always make the news when downtime occurs, which in turn leads to a loss of customer confidence. In addition, any organization that has sellable data often finds themselves in the cross hairs of a Dark DDoS attack. Remember, attackers in this case want access to your data, and will do just about anything to get it. Attackers also love notoriety. News-making attacks are often like winning a professional game of chess. Their strategies, skills, and perseverance are all tested and honed. Hacker undergrounds take notice of highly skilled attackers. Often job agreements or an offer for “a piece of the action” is the reward for those with notable skills. While all of this activity may be considered illegal in just about every country, the reward seems to outweigh the punishment. As long as that is the case, attackers will continue their activities for the foreseeable future. So, what’s the solution? Put the right defenses in place and eliminate this problem – once and for all. It begins with understanding the importance of cloud-based DDoS defenses. These defenses are designed to defeat pipe-saturating attacks closest to their source. They also reduce latency involved with DDoS mitigation, and help eliminate the needs to backhaul traffic around the globe to be cleansed or null routed. Selecting a cloud provider with the highest number of strategically located DDoS defense centers that they operate themselves, makes the absolute best sense. In addition, selecting a cloud provider who can offer  direct connectivity  to your organization where applicable is also the recommendation. Diverting incoming traffic to the cloud to be cleansed is normally done via BGP. It’s simple, fast, and effective. However, returning the “clean” traffic back to the customer represents a new set of challenges. Most cloud providers recommend GRE tunnels, but that approach is not always the best. If you can connect “directly” to your cloud provider, it will eliminate the need for GRE and the problems that accompany that approach. The result of a direct connection is quicker mitigation and more efficient traffic reinjection. Are cloud-based DDoS defenses the end-all? Not really. The industry recognizes a better method called the hybrid-approach. The thought process here is that smaller, shorter DDoS attacks are more effectively defeated by on-premises technology, while larger and longer attacks are more efficiently defeated in the cloud. The combination of the two approaches will stop all DDoS attacks in their tracks. In addition, volumetric attacks are easily defeated in the cloud, closest to the source of attack. Low-and-slow attacks are more effectively defeated closer to the devices under attack. This combined approach provides the best of both worlds. Complete visibility is another benefit of the hybrid approach. Cloud-based DDoS defense providers who have no on-premises defense technology are blind to the  attacks against their own customers . Many cloud providers attempt to monitor firewall logs and SNMP traps at the customer’s premises to help detect an attack. However, that’s comparable to using a magnifying glass to study the surface of the moon – from earth. The magnifying glass is not powerful enough, nor does it offer enough granularity to detect the subtleties of the moon’s surface. Purpose-built, on-premises DDoS defense technologies are the eyes and ears for the cloud provider. The goal here is to detect the attack  before  a customer actually knows they’re under attack. This equates to immediate DDoS detection and defense. Detection is actually the hardest part of the DDoS equation. Once an attack is detected, mitigation approaches for the most part are similar from one vendor to another. Using a set of well-defined mechanisms can eliminate nearly every attack. Most defenses are based upon a thorough understanding of the way protocols work and the behaviors of abnormal visitors. Finding a vendor who has the most tools and features in their defensive arsenal is the best practice. The final recommendation is to select a vendor who has both cloud-based and on-premises defenses, especially if those defenses use the same underlying technologies. On-premises hardware manufacturers who also offer cloud-based services are the way to go. The reasoning is simple. If the cloud defenses are quite effective, adding on-premises defenses of the same pedigree will become even more effective. In addition, the integration of the two approaches becomes streamlined when working with a single vendor. Incompatibilities will never be an issue. If the recommendations in this article are followed, DDoS will never be an issue for you again. The vulnerability is addressed, the risk is mitigated, and the network is protected. That’s what IT professionals are looking for – a complete solution. Source: http://virtual-strategy.com/2016/08/15/need-know-evolution-ddos/

Read this article:
What You Need to Know about the Evolution of DDoS

Meet DDoSCoin, the cryptocurrency that pays when you p0wn

Proof-of-work turned to nefarious purposes, like taking down a Census A curious proof-of-work project built on cryptocurrency has emerged that offers a means to prove participation in distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks.…

Read More:
Meet DDoSCoin, the cryptocurrency that pays when you p0wn

The Hidden Role of DDoS in Ransomware Attacks

Dave Larson offers advice for organisations wishing to protect themselves from the latest types of cyber-extortion Ransom demands and DDoS attacks are now, more than ever, being used together in inventive new techniques to extract money from victims. This ranges from hackers threatening to launch a DDoS attack unless a ransom is paid, to the recent reports of a multi-layered cyber-attack combining ransomware and DDoS attacks in one. But what is often less understood is the way that sub-saturating DDoS attacks are regularly being used as a precursor to ransomware incursion.  Because these attacks are so short – typically less than five minutes in duration – these low-bandwidth DDoS attacks allow hackers to test for vulnerabilities within a network, which can later be exploited through ransomware. Here we outline some of the typical methods of cyber-extortion involving DDoS attacks, and explain why automatic DDoS mitigation is such a key defence in the ongoing battle against ransomware. Extortion is one of the oldest tricks in the criminal’s book, and one of the easiest ways for today’s cyber-criminals to turn a profit.  As a result, there are a significant number of techniques that hackers will utilise to try and extract money from victims. One of the most common is DDoS ransom attacks, where attackers threaten to launch a DDoS attack against a victim unless a ransom is paid. These attacks can affect any internet-facing organisation and are often indiscriminate in nature. In May, the City of London Police warned of a new wave of ransom-driven DDoS attacks orchestrated by Lizard Squad, in which UK businesses were told that they would be targeted by a DDoS attack if they refused to pay five bitcoins, equivalent to just over £1,500.  According to the results of a recent survey, 80 percent of IT security professionals believe that their organisation will be threatened with a DDoS attack in the next 12 months – and almost half (43 percent) believe their organisation might pay such a demand. But despite the prevalence of DDoS ransom attacks, and its longevity as a technique, nothing elicits the same degree of alarm among security teams as the current threat of ransomware. This type of malware is estimated to have cost US businesses as much as US$ 18 million (£13.7 million) in a single year, and has already claimed a string of high-profile victims including hospitals and public bodies. Earlier this month, European police agency Europol launched a new ransomware advice service aimed at slowing down its exponential rise. But when it comes to protecting your organisation’s data from being encrypted and lost, most advice focuses on recovery, rather than prevention. This includes having a good backup policy, which ideally involves serialising data so that multiple versions of the files are available, in case newer versions have been encrypted. But what about taking a more proactive stance? We know that ransomware is usually delivered via email, inviting respondents to click on a link to download malware. Typically the themes of these emails include shipping notices from delivery companies or an invitation to open other documents that the recipient supposedly needs to review.  It’s true that many of these emails are sent opportunistically and on a blanket basis to a wide number of potential victims. But we are also seeing an increase in more targeted attacks, designed to gain access to a specific organisation’s networks.  After all, attacking a larger, more high-profile organisation would normally command a higher potential ransom reward, so hackers are investing an increasing amount of time researching specific victims and locating their vulnerabilities – usually through a variety of automated scanning or penetration techniques, many of which are increasingly incorporating the use of sub-saturating, low-bandwidth DDoS vectors. Most people associate the term ‘DDoS’ with system downtime, because the acronym stands for “Distributed Denial of Service”. But DDoS threats are constantly evolving, and many hackers now use them as a sophisticated means of targeting, profiling, and infiltrating networks. Short, sub-saturating DDoS attacks are typically less than five minutes in duration, meaning that they can easily slip under the radar without being detected by some DDoS mitigation systems. Five minutes may seem like an insignificant amount of time – but an appropriately crafted attack may only need a few seconds to take critical security infrastructure, like firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) offline. While IT teams are distracted by investigating what might be causing these momentary outages on the network, hackers can map the floor plan of their target’s environment, and determine any weak points and vulnerabilities that can later be exploited through other methods, such as ransomware. It is only by deploying an in-line DDoS mitigation system that is always-on, and can detect and mitigate all DDoS attacks as they occur, that security teams can protect themselves from hackers fully understanding all possible vulnerabilities in their networks. While these short DDoS attacks might sound harmless – in that they don’t cause extended periods of downtime – IT teams who choose to ignore them are effectively leaving their doors wide open for ransomware attacks or other more serious intrusions. To keep up with the growing sophistication and organisation of well-equipped and well-funded threat actors, it’s essential that organisations maintain a comprehensive visibility across their networks to spot and resolve any potential incursions as they arise. Source: http://www.scmagazineuk.com/the-hidden-role-of-ddos-in-ransomware-attacks/article/514229/

Read more here:
The Hidden Role of DDoS in Ransomware Attacks

What are the DoS and DDoS attacks that brought down the census?

Experts believe that the electronic assault on the census site was a DDoS attack – a kind of electronic army that attacks an enemy’s website on every flank using millions of computers as soldiers.  About 2000 of these attacks occur every day across the world, said DigitalAttackMap, a website that monitors such attacks. Only days ago, this type of attack shut down US Olympic swimming Michael Phelps’ commercial website,  SCMagazine , which specialises in IT security, said.  It said the attack happened fresh after Phelps’ gold medal-winning performance in the men’s 4×100 metre freestyle relay at the Rio Games. One hacking expert told  Time  magazine that any celebrity or high-profile site should expect these attacks. “Each celebrity on our target list will be either hacked or DDoSed,” a representative of hacking group New World Hackers said. Xbox, US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and the BBC have been among New World Hackers’ recent targets. DigitalAttackMap, a joint venture between Google Ideas and network security firm Arbor Networks, said these attacks had hit online gaming sites, newspapers and banks; Greek banks were crippled this year. Yet its site doesn’t show a DDoS attack on the ABS census site on Tuesday, bolstering claims by some that the attack didn’t take place.  The DigitalAttackMap tracks DDoS attacks on a daily basis. The red flare over Brazil shows a serious DDoS attack.   Photo: DigitalAttackMap.com The Australian Bureau of Statistics said its census site was hit four times by denial of service (DoS) attacks. A DoS is a broad term for attacks that attempt to crash an online system so that users cannot access it. Some IT and cybersecurity professionals speculated that a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack was to blame.  A DDoS is a type of DoS attack in which hackers attempt to crash a system by flooding it with bots – or Trojan – accounts. DigitalAttackMap said attackers cripple websites, such as the ABS’ census site, by building networks of infected computers, known as botnets, by spreading malicious software through emails, websites and social media. Once infected, these machines can be controlled remotely, without their owners’ knowledge, and used like an army to launch an attack against any target. Some botnets are millions of machines  strong.   DigitalAttackMap says these botnets can generate huge floods of traffic to overwhelm a target. “These floods can be generated in multiple ways, such as sending more connection requests than a server can handle, or having computers send the victim huge amounts of random data to use up the target’s bandwidth. Some attacks are so big they can max out a country’s international cable capacity.” Adding to many people’s fears about the security of the census website before the attack, the information gained from these sites during an attack is sold on online marketplaces that specialise in information gained from these DDoS attacks, DigitalAttackMap said. “Using these underground markets, anyone can pay a nominal fee to silence websites they disagree with or disrupt an organisation’s online operations. A week-long DDoS attack, capable of taking a small organisation offline, can cost as little as $150,” the website said. Source: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/what-are-the-dos-and-ddos-attacks-that-brought-down-the-census-20160809-gqowwp.html

Read More:
What are the DoS and DDoS attacks that brought down the census?

If two countries waged cyber war on each another, here’s what to expect

Imagine you woke up to discover a massive cyber attack on your country. All government data has been destroyed, taking out healthcare records, birth certificates, social care records and so much more. The transport system isn’t working, traffic lights are blank, immigration is in chaos and all tax records have disappeared. The internet has been reduced to an error message and daily life as you know it has halted. This might sound fanciful but don’t be so sure. When countries declare war on one another in future, this sort of disaster might be the opportunity the enemy is looking for. The internet has brought us many great things but it has made us more vulnerable. Protecting against such futuristic violence is one of the key challenges of the 21st century. Strategists know that the most fragile part of internet infrastructure is the energy supply. The starting point in serious cyber warfare may well be to trip the power stations which power the data centres involved with the core routing elements of the network. Back-up generators and uninterruptible power supplies might offer protection, but they don’t always work and can potentially be hacked. In any case, backup power is usually designed to shut off after a few hours. That is enough time to correct a normal fault, but cyber attacks might require backup for days or even weeks. William Cohen, the former US secretary of defence, recently predicted such a major outage would cause large-scale economic damage and civil unrest throughout a country. In a war situation, this could be enough to bring about defeat. Janet Napolitano, a former secretary at the US Department of Homeland Security, believes the American system is not well enough protected to avoid this. Denial of service An attack on the national grid could involve what is called a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. These use multiple computers to flood a system with information from many sources at the same time. This could make it easier for hackers to neutralise the backup power and tripping the system. DDoS attacks are also a major threat in their own right. They could overload the main network gateways of a country and cause major outages. Such attacks are commonplace against the private sector, particularly finance companies. Akamai Technologies, which controls 30% of internet traffic, recently said these are the most worrying kind of attack and becoming ever more sophisticated. Akamai recently monitored a sustained attack against a media outlet of 363 gigabits per second (Gbps) – a scale which few companies, let alone a nation, could cope with for long. Networks specialist Verisign reports a shocking 111% increase in DDoS attacks per year, almost half of them over 10 Gbps in scale – much more powerful than previously. The top sourcesare Vietnam, Brazil and Columbia. Number of attacks Verisign Scale of attacks Verisign Most DDoS attacks swamp an internal network with traffic via the DNS and NTP servers that provide most core services within the network. Without DNS the internet wouldn’t work, but it is weak from a security point of view. Specialists have been trying to come up with a solution, but building security into these servers to recognise DDoS attacks appears to mean re-engineering the entire internet. How to react If a country’s grid were taken down by an attack for any length of time, the ensuing chaos would potentially be enough to win a war outright. If instead its online infrastructure were substantially compromised by a DDoS attack, the response would probably go like this: Phase one: Takeover of network : the country’s security operations centre would need to take control of internet traffic to stop its citizens from crashing the internal infrastructure. We possibly saw this in the failed Turkish coup a few weeks ago, where YouTube and social media went completely offline inside the country. Phase two: Analysis of attack : security analysts would be trying to figure out how to cope with the attack without affecting the internal operation of the network. Phase three: Observation and large-scale control : the authorities would be faced with countless alerts about system crashes and problems. The challenge would be to ensure only key alerts reached the analysts trying to overcome the problems before the infrastructure collapsed. A key focus would be ensuring military, transport, energy, health and law enforcement systems were given the highest priority, along with financial systems. Phase four. Observation and fine control : by this stage there would be some stability and the attention could turn to lesser but important alerts regarding things like financial and commercial interests. Phase five. Coping and restoring : this would be about restoring normality and trying to recover damaged systems. The challenge would be to reach this phase as quickly as possible with the least sustained damage. State of play If even the security-heavy US is concerned about its grid, the same is likely to be true of most countries. I suspect many countries are not well drilled to cope with sustained DDoS, especially given the fundamental weaknesses in DNS servers. Small countries are particularly at risk because they often depend on infrastructure that reaches a central point in a larger country nearby. The UK, it should be said, is probably better placed than some countries to survive cyber warfare. It enjoys an independent grid and GCHQ and the National Crime Agency have helped to encourage some of the best private sector security operations centres in the world. Many countries could probably learn a great deal from it. Estonia, whose infrastructure was disabled for several days in 2007 following a cyber attack, is now looking at moving copies of government data to the UK for protection. Given the current level of international tension and the potential damage from a major cyber attack, this is an area that all countries need to take very seriously. Better to do it now rather than waiting until one country pays the price. For better and worse, the world has never been so connected. Source: http://theconversation.com/if-two-countries-waged-cyber-war-on-each-another-heres-what-to-expect-63544

Visit site:
If two countries waged cyber war on each another, here’s what to expect

Overwatch,’ ‘Warcraft’ Servers Sidelined By DDoS Attack From Hacking Group PoodleCorp

Blizzard was hit with a DDoS attack that made its servers inaccessible, disrupting gameplay for Battle.net users on Aug. 2. Someone from Blizzard’s customer support team posted on the Battle.net forums to acknowledge the attack, saying network engineers are on the case, working to address the issue. The problem has since been resolved, but according to a tweet from Blizzard’s North American customer support team, reports of World Server Down in  World of Warcraft  are being investigated. In a tweet, hacker group PoodleCorp claimed responsibility for the DDoS attack. It’s not clear who is PoodleCorp exactly, but some Battle.net users have surmised that some of the hacking group’s members could be players who were recently banned from  Overwatch , and thus now out for revenge. Whoever they are, PoodleCorp appears to be a busy group. A day before the DDoS attack on Blizzard, the hackers apparently took on  Pokémon GO , marking their second takedown of the mobile game after first attacking it on July 16. Pokémon GO  servers were also down for several hours on July 17, but OurMine, another hacking group, took the credit for that attack. In an interview via Twitter DM, PoodleCorp’s leader, @xotehpoodle, told Mic that they targeted  Pokémon GO  because it’s popular right now. Also, they’re doing what they’re doing because nobody can stop them. “We do it because we can, nobody can stop us and we just like to cause chaos,” said the hacking group’s head, who added that their botnet is worth more than Niantic. Over the summer, PoodleCorp also claimed responsibility for hacking  League of Legends  and popular YouTubers. Earlier in June, Blizzard also experienced a major outage as another DDoS attack took out its servers. Twitter user AppleJ4ck, said to be tied to hacking group Lizard Squad, claimed responsibility for the attack and mocked Blizzard, saying the attack was part of some “preparations.” As PoodleCorp has claimed responsibility for the most recent outage, does that mean that there’s more to come given what AppleJ4ck’s been preparing for has not come to fruition? In the past, Lizard Squad had been connected to disruptions on Microsoft’s Xbox Live and Sony’s PlayStation Network. When angry gamers swarmed the hackers’ Twitter accounts, PoodleCorp and AppleJ4ck replied with similar messages, saying anyone who gets upset over a game should get a life and that they’re doing everyone a favor by knocking them offline. Source: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/172361/20160803/overwatch-warcraft-servers-sidelined-by-ddos-attack-from-hacking-group-poodlecorp.htm

Follow this link:
Overwatch,’ ‘Warcraft’ Servers Sidelined By DDoS Attack From Hacking Group PoodleCorp

123-Reg drowns in ongoing DDoS tsunami

Data centre target of attack of 30+ Gbps Beleaguered web host 123-Reg has suffered a “huge scale” distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack to its data centre – knocking the Brit outfit’s website offline and a number of users’ services. The attack began this morning and is still ongoing but no performance-related issues have been reported since the traffic was rerouted. The Register understands that the outfit experienced a DDoS attack of 30-plus Gbps to its data centre, with its protection systems kicking in within seconds of the attack being detected. Consequently the business redirected traffic through its secondary “DDoS protection platform” in Germany, which doubled its capacity. No servers were offline, although customers experienced intermittent connection issues such as our website, control panel, email or websites. A 123-Reg spokeswoman said: “At about 10:10am we received a huge scale DDoS attack to our data centre. “Our protection systems kicked in immediately and the attack was contained by 10:40am. We apologise for any intermittent connection issues to our services that some of our customers may have experienced during this time.” Back in November, internet provider Eclipse was hit by a DDoS attack. ® Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/02/123reg_suffers/

Read More:
123-Reg drowns in ongoing DDoS tsunami