Category Archives: Uncategorized

Netflix Incident A Sign Of Increase In Cyber Extortion Campaigns

Attackers using threats of data exposure and DDoS disruptions to try and extort ransoms from organizations The recent leak of 10 unaired episodes from Season 5 of Netflix’ hit series “Orange Is The New Black” shows that ransomware is not the only form of online extortion for which organizations need to be prepared. Increasingly, cyber criminals have begun attempting to extort money from organizations by threatening to leak corporate and customer data, trade secrets, and intellectual property. Instead of encrypting data and seeking a ransom for decrypting it, criminals have begun using doxing as a leverage to try and quietly extort bigger sums from enterprises. “Targeted attacks are the new cybersecurity threat and are on the rise,” says Nir Gaist, CEO and co-founder of security vendor Nyotron. “Organizations, regardless of industry or size, can be targeted with cyber extortion or espionage as the hackers’ goal.” The reason why there isn’t more noise over such incidents is that victims often like to keep quiet about them, he says. “Unless the company is regulated to report the attack, they will keep it quiet to keep brand and reputation intact,” Gaist says. Even in the case of the Netflix leak, for instance, it was the hackers themselves who announced the attack. “There was no monetary loss due to the early release of the ‘Orange is the New Black’ episodes, but there was reputation loss and brand damage,” he says. A malicious hacker or hacking group calling itself TheDarkOverload earlier this week claimed responsibility for publicly posting several episodes of the Netflix series after apparently stealing them from Larson Studio, a small post-production company, back in December. The hackers first tried to extort money from Larson Studio before going after Netflix directly. When Netflix refused to acquiesce to the extortion demand, the hackers released the unaired episodes. The hackers claimed to have stolen several more unaired episodes of TV programs from Netflix, Fox, and National Geographic and have threatened to release them as well. It is not clear if the hackers have made any extortion demands from the various studios. The Netflix incident is an example of the growing threat to organizations from extortion scams, says Moty Cristal the CEO of NEST Negotiation Strategies, a firm that specializes in helping organizations negotiate with online extortionists. Cyber extortion can include the threat of DDoS attacks and data exposure. The goal of attackers is to find a way to threaten targets with the most damage, either financial or from a brand reputation standpoint, Cristal explains. Any decision on whether to pay or not to pay should be based on an assessment of the potential damage, both real and perceived, that the attacker could wreak, and the company’s ability to withstand such damage, Cristal says. In the Netflix incident, the fact that the attackers demanded just around 50 bitcoin for the stolen episodes suggests they were likely motivated more by the need to be recognized and professionally acknowledged than by financial gain, Cristal adds. Surprisingly, targeted extortion attacks do not always have to be sophisticated to be successful, although sometimes they can very sophisticated Gaist says. “In a targeted attack, the hacker will attempt to find a simple vulnerability to get in,” he says. “Unfortunately for most companies, basic security hygiene is simply not attended to properly – leaving them completely vulnerable to a targeted attack.” While attacks that result in potential exposure of customer and corporate data can be scary, there are a couple of good reasons not to pay, security analysts say. One of course is that paying off a ransom or extortion is only likely to inspire more attempts. An organization that shows its willingness to pay to get data back or to prevent something bad from happening will almost certainly be attacked again. The other reason is that not all extortion scams are real. In fact, a lot of times attackers will attempt to scare money out of an organization with false threats. Last year for instance, a malicious hacking group calling itself the Armada Collective sent extortion letters to some 100 companies threatening them with massive distributed denial of service attacks if they did not pay a specific ransom amount. Security vendor CloudFlare, which analyzed the Armada Collective’s activities, estimated that the group netted hundreds of thousands of dollars in ransom payments from victims, without carrying out a single attack. Meg Grady-Troia, web security product marketing manager at Akamai, says paying a ransom doesn’t necessarily guarantee a chosen outcome. “So doing separate analysis of the request for payment and the real threat is critical for any organization.” Akamai’s customers have seen a lot of extortion letters, threatening a DDoS attack if a specified amount of bitcoin is not deposited to an identified wallet by a certain time, she says. These letters have come from a number of groups, including DD4BC, Armada Collective, Lizard Squad, XMR Squad, and others. Often though, there is very little follow-through. “Some of these DDoS extortion letters are merely profit-making schemes, while some are serious operations with the resources to damage a business,” says Grady-Troia. Paying a ransom is no guarantee that your data still won’t be leaked, she says. “Once data has been exfiltrated from your system, the blackmail may or may not continue after the requested payment, or it may still be leaked.” What organizations need to be focusing on is DDoS attack resilience and the operational agility of their systems, particularly access controls, backup procedures, and digital supply chain. “The importance of online extortion depends immensely on the nature of the threat and the enterprise’s risk tolerance,” Grady-Troia says. “Businesses should have a security event or incident response process that can be invoked in the case of any attack, and that process should include subject matter experts for systems and tools, procedures for all kinds of hazards.” Source: http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/netflix-incident-a-sign-of-increase-in-cyber-extortion-campaigns/d/d-id/1328794

Read the article:
Netflix Incident A Sign Of Increase In Cyber Extortion Campaigns

The Hidden Role of DDoS in Ransomware Attacks

Dave Larson offers advice for organisations wishing to protect themselves from the latest types of cyber-extortion Ransom demands and DDoS attacks are now, more than ever, being used together in inventive new techniques to extract money from victims. This ranges from hackers threatening to launch a DDoS attack unless a ransom is paid, to the recent reports of a multi-layered cyber-attack combining ransomware and DDoS attacks in one. But what is often less understood is the way that sub-saturating DDoS attacks are regularly being used as a precursor to ransomware incursion.  Because these attacks are so short – typically less than five minutes in duration – these low-bandwidth DDoS attacks allow hackers to test for vulnerabilities within a network, which can later be exploited through ransomware. Here we outline some of the typical methods of cyber-extortion involving DDoS attacks, and explain why automatic DDoS mitigation is such a key defence in the ongoing battle against ransomware. Extortion is one of the oldest tricks in the criminal’s book, and one of the easiest ways for today’s cyber-criminals to turn a profit.  As a result, there are a significant number of techniques that hackers will utilise to try and extract money from victims. One of the most common is DDoS ransom attacks, where attackers threaten to launch a DDoS attack against a victim unless a ransom is paid. These attacks can affect any internet-facing organisation and are often indiscriminate in nature. In May, the City of London Police warned of a new wave of ransom-driven DDoS attacks orchestrated by Lizard Squad, in which UK businesses were told that they would be targeted by a DDoS attack if they refused to pay five bitcoins, equivalent to just over £1,500.  According to the results of a recent survey, 80 percent of IT security professionals believe that their organisation will be threatened with a DDoS attack in the next 12 months – and almost half (43 percent) believe their organisation might pay such a demand. But despite the prevalence of DDoS ransom attacks, and its longevity as a technique, nothing elicits the same degree of alarm among security teams as the current threat of ransomware. This type of malware is estimated to have cost US businesses as much as US$ 18 million (£13.7 million) in a single year, and has already claimed a string of high-profile victims including hospitals and public bodies. Earlier this month, European police agency Europol launched a new ransomware advice service aimed at slowing down its exponential rise. But when it comes to protecting your organisation’s data from being encrypted and lost, most advice focuses on recovery, rather than prevention. This includes having a good backup policy, which ideally involves serialising data so that multiple versions of the files are available, in case newer versions have been encrypted. But what about taking a more proactive stance? We know that ransomware is usually delivered via email, inviting respondents to click on a link to download malware. Typically the themes of these emails include shipping notices from delivery companies or an invitation to open other documents that the recipient supposedly needs to review.  It’s true that many of these emails are sent opportunistically and on a blanket basis to a wide number of potential victims. But we are also seeing an increase in more targeted attacks, designed to gain access to a specific organisation’s networks.  After all, attacking a larger, more high-profile organisation would normally command a higher potential ransom reward, so hackers are investing an increasing amount of time researching specific victims and locating their vulnerabilities – usually through a variety of automated scanning or penetration techniques, many of which are increasingly incorporating the use of sub-saturating, low-bandwidth DDoS vectors. Most people associate the term ‘DDoS’ with system downtime, because the acronym stands for “Distributed Denial of Service”. But DDoS threats are constantly evolving, and many hackers now use them as a sophisticated means of targeting, profiling, and infiltrating networks. Short, sub-saturating DDoS attacks are typically less than five minutes in duration, meaning that they can easily slip under the radar without being detected by some DDoS mitigation systems. Five minutes may seem like an insignificant amount of time – but an appropriately crafted attack may only need a few seconds to take critical security infrastructure, like firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) offline. While IT teams are distracted by investigating what might be causing these momentary outages on the network, hackers can map the floor plan of their target’s environment, and determine any weak points and vulnerabilities that can later be exploited through other methods, such as ransomware. It is only by deploying an in-line DDoS mitigation system that is always-on, and can detect and mitigate all DDoS attacks as they occur, that security teams can protect themselves from hackers fully understanding all possible vulnerabilities in their networks. While these short DDoS attacks might sound harmless – in that they don’t cause extended periods of downtime – IT teams who choose to ignore them are effectively leaving their doors wide open for ransomware attacks or other more serious intrusions. To keep up with the growing sophistication and organisation of well-equipped and well-funded threat actors, it’s essential that organisations maintain a comprehensive visibility across their networks to spot and resolve any potential incursions as they arise. Source: http://www.scmagazineuk.com/the-hidden-role-of-ddos-in-ransomware-attacks/article/514229/

Read more here:
The Hidden Role of DDoS in Ransomware Attacks

68 gov’t websites attacked

Several Philippine government websites have been subjected to various forms of cyberattacks following the release of the ruling on the arbitration case filed by the Philippines against China. The STAR learned yesterday that at least 68 websites have been subjected to attacks, which included attempts of hacking and defacement, slowdowns and distributed denial of service attacks. Among those at the receiving end were agencies such as the Department of National Defense, the Philippine Coast Guard, Department of Foreign Affairs, Department of Health, the Presidential Management Staff and the gov.ph domain registry website. The website of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas was also subjected to a supposed hacking, although authorities were able to immediately foil it. The websites of these agencies were all accessible yesterday. The source of the attacks has yet to be determined, although initial investigation supposedly pointed to an entity supposedly operating from the Netherlands. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that issued the ruling on the Philippine case is based in The Hague in the Netherlands. The Information and Communications Technology Office, the precursor of the newly created Department of Information and Communications Technology, has yet to respond to request for comment regarding the cyberattacks. The Department of Science and Technology earlier provided additional protection to Philippine government websites amid repeated incidents of defacements and denial of service attacks. PCA website hacking Earlier, a cyber-security company reported that the PCA website was infected with a malware by “someone from China” in July 2015. Citing information from ThreatConnect Inc., Bloomberg Business reported the attack happened in the midst of the week-long hearing on the jurisdiction of the arbitration case filed by Manila against Beijing over the territorial dispute in the South China Sea. Gaelle Chevalier, a case manager at the PCA, told Bloomberg that they “have no information about the cause of the problems.” Source: http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/07/16/1603250/68-govt-websites-attacked

Read the article:
68 gov’t websites attacked

Cyber security expert warns of massive Ddos attacks against Armenian websites

Armenian cyber security expert Samvel Martirosyan warned today of Ddos attacks against Armenian websites. According to his personal site, a massive Ddos attack in 7 Gbps began yesterday in Japan. “Given that the attack is carried out from one country, we can assume that it may be a sensing, and it is possible that massive attacks from different countries may follow in the coming days,» says Martirosyan. He says that ahead of the meeting of the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham Aliyev, in Paris on October 27, a similar but more powerful attack had been registered against the Armenian president’s official website. Source: http://telecom.arka.am/en/news/internet/cyber_security_expert_warns_of_massive_ddos_attacks_against_armenian_websites/

See more here:
Cyber security expert warns of massive Ddos attacks against Armenian websites

Shellshock: ‘LARGER SCALE ATTACK’ on its way, warn securo-bods

Not just web servers under threat – though TENS of THOUSANDS have been hit The Shellshock vulnerability has already become the focus for malicious scanning and at least one botnet but crooks are still testing the waters with the vulnerability and much worse could follow, security watchers warn.…

Follow this link:
Shellshock: ‘LARGER SCALE ATTACK’ on its way, warn securo-bods

WEBINAR – The Ultimate DDoS Info Session

DOSarrest and HOSTING partner together to help you understand the details of DDoS attacks – how they are executed, what they typically targets and how to quickly and efficiently recovered when you fall victor. It will be an interactive and informative session as all attendees will have a chance to participate in and defend against a DDoS attack in Real-Time and see its effects on a live website. Click here to register today!

Taken from:
WEBINAR – The Ultimate DDoS Info Session

Are your servers secure from hackers ?

As the Reuters headline read this week “Hackers break into server for Obamacare website” It was about hackers who uploaded malicious code onto a development server, which is part of ObamaCare. The code installed on the government website was said to be part of a larger operation and used primarily to carry out DDoS attacks on other websites. What’s so important about such a tiny infraction ? It gives you an idea of why DDoS attacks are getting larger and more sophisticated and more frequent. It would be a safe bet to assume this development machine had plenty of horsepower and a GigE connection that wasn’t throttled. This is where a lot of DDoS attacks are being perpetrated from especially the large and complex variety. Its not bot infected laptops at home anymore, although they can be troublesome too sometimes. Its easy to let security slide if it’s a test or development machine that’s just used by programmers and maybe just completely forgotten about when a project ends. Don’t become part of the problem. Run vulnerability scans to test and find holes where hackers can gain entry. When DOSarrest Internet Security started offering Vulnerability testing last year, they saw almost 9 out of 10 servers had at least one vulnerability and most had multiple holes.

View the original here:
Are your servers secure from hackers ?

Attacker could use default defibrillator password to launch DDoS attack

Jay Radcliffe freaked out the medical community in 2011 when he revealed how insulin pumps could be hacked to deliver a fatal dose of insulin (pdf). Yet at a medical device security and privacy roundtable discussion at Black Hat, Radcliffe said “it would be far easier and more likely for an attacker to sneak up behind him and deliver a fatal blow to his head with a baseball bat,” than hack his insulin pump to kill him. He did discuss hacking implantable medical devices. There are no known cases of hacking a pacemaker in anything other than fiction, but if an attacker remotely hacked a pacemaker, no one is going to dig into the death. It would be called a heart attack and that would be the end of it because “there’s no process in place right now that checks these implanted medical devices for failure or malicious activity.” Rapid7 point out, “Security often just isn’t on the radar at all for the manufacturers, the pharmaceutical regulators, or even the medical professionals that work with them.” The term “medical device” could mean a broad range of things from pacemakers to “MRI machines and echo-cardiograms and computers in the hospital running Windows XP. Mobile apps and health-related consumer-focused applications could also be considered under this broad umbrella.” John Pescatore, who previously worked at the NSA and at the U.S. Secret Service before joining SANS, released a whitepaper based on a survey about Internet of Things security. Medical machinery and personal implanted medical devices are considered to be part of the IoT. After all, people can use SHODAN to find fetal heart monitors if they are so inclined. Pescatore wrote: Internet-connected computing capabilities related to smart building and industrial control systems and medical devices were the most commonly cited concerns after consumer devices. While these type of devices don’t receive much hype with respect to the IoT in the press, the use of embedded computing in those devices (versus layered operating systems and applications in PCs and servers that IT is accustomed to managing and securing) will cause major breakage in existing IT management and IT security visibility, vulnerability assessment, configuration management and intrusion prevention processes and controls. SANS also looked at cyberthreat intelligence provided by Norse and then published a whitepaper about “Widespread Compromises Detected, Compliance Nightmare on Horizon.” Norse analyzed over 100 terabytes of daily traffic and determined there were 49,917 unique malicious events, 723 unique malicious source IP addresses and 375 U.S.-based compromised health care-related organizations. “There are many reasons why these findings are cause for alarm,” wrote Barbara Filkins. One example was: “The sheer volume of IP addresses detected in this targeted sample can be extrapolated to assume that there are, in fact, millions of compromised health care organizations, applications, devices and systems sending malicious packets from around the globe.” Those aren’t the only threats. If a person was in cardiac arrest, a defibrillator could be used to save that person’s life. But what if someone who was not authorized to use or to tweak the defibrillator settings, did so? That may be unlikely, but not impossible. Default usernames and passwords for medical devices are problematic and are “often overlooked endpoints;” they “can be easily procured by an Internet search on ‘type of device’ plus ‘default password’.” Yesterday, the National Vulnerability Database published two advisories regarding ZOLL Defibrillators. The accompanying documents from the manufacturer describe how to change default configurations on the devices. CVE-2013-7395 states: “ZOLL Defibrillator / Monitor X Series has a default (1) supervisor password and (2) service password, which allows physically proximate attackers to modify device configuration and cause a denial of service (adverse human health effects).” CVE-2007-6756 states: “ZOLL Defibrillator / Monitor M Series, E Series, and R Series have a default password for System Configuration mode, which allows physically proximate attackers to modify device configuration and cause a denial of service (adverse human health effects).” So who is responsible for deploying the fix? The FDA guidance suggests that both hospitals and manufacturers are responsible for vulnerability management. Yet Radcliffe said that makes the problem of deploying patches even more murky. He explained that “if there is a bug in an MRI machine, the hospital will have to pay to have the manufacturer come in and update all the affected machines. Of course, the hospital could install the updates themselves, but they run the risk of losing their warranty. The hospital could also decide they don’t have the budget available to pay to have the patches installed and merely wait.” Those defibrillators are not the only machines that with default passwords that potentially pose a risk. “Most devices have no security applications on them at all. Anyone can just get in and manipulate whatever they want,” stated an unnamed hospital chief information security officer in a McKinsey Report. Forbes looked into how a network-attached printer using the defaults of “admin” and “12345” for a password could be a “near perfect and silent entry point” for hackers. Lastly, Radcliffe addressed how more security on medical devices could cause patients to have less privacy. For example, if a person with an implantable medical device were to die, then “who can look at a log of his or her health before death? That’s a serious privacy concern, but what if it helps doctors find issues with IMDs, or detect evidence of foul play such as hacking?” Source: http://www.networkworld.com/article/2464010/microsoft-subnet/attacker-could-use-default-defibrillator-password-to-launch-denial-of-service.html

View post:
Attacker could use default defibrillator password to launch DDoS attack

#OpSaveGaza: Anonymous Takes Down 1,000 Israeli Government and Business Websites

Hacker collective Anonymous has announced that it has taken down over a thousand of crucial Israeli websites in a huge new coordinated cyber-attack called #OpSaveGaza on 11 July and 17 July, in support of the people of Palestine. Some of the websites, such as the Tel Aviv Police Department’s online presence, are still offline two days after the distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, and numerous Israeli government homepages have been replaced by graphics, slogans, and auto-playing audio files made by AnonGhost, the team of hackers who coordinated the attack. The official Israeli government jobs website has had its homepage replaced by a graphic titled “Akincilar”, which is Turkish for the Ottoman Empire’s troops. Akincilar: A graphic and message protesting against the treatment of Palestinians is still replacing the homepage of certain Israeli government websites A message written in English and Turkish – presumably by Turkish hackers – and accompanied by pictures of Palestinians suffering says: “The Jerusalem cause is Muslims’ fight of honour” and says that people who fight for Palestine are “on the side of Allah”. Another Israeli government website now bears an AnonGhost graphic and lists the usernames of 38 hackers. An audio file that auto-plays when the page loads plays music and a synthesized newsreader clip, together with a message beseeching human rights organisations, hackers and activists to attack Israeli websites to become the “cyber shield, the voice for the forgotten people”. AnonGhost’s #OpSaveGaza message has been displayed on many Israeli websites Many of the websites have since been restored. The hackers have also leaked lists of Israeli government email addresses obtained by hacking websites of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Culture and Sport, the Ministry of Housing and Construction and much more. Israeli websites belonging to restaurants, local businesses, associations, societies, academic foundations and even a symphony orchestra were also attacked, as well as a subdomain belonging to MSN Israel. A message on the main Pastebin page and some of the hacked websites reads : “The act of launching rockets from Gaza sector to Israhell is an acceptable and normal reaction against those pigs, it’s called Resistance and not terrorism. “Israhell never existed its only Palestine, it’s our home. If you are a Hacker, Activist, a Human Right Organisation then hack israel websites and expose to the world their crimes, show to the world how much blood is on their hands, blood of innocent children and women.” Anonymous has previously run another campaign in April targeting Israeli websites, although on a smaller scale. About 500 websites went offline during the OpIsrael campaign and the hackers released the phone numbers and email addresses of some Israeli officials. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/opsavegaza-anonymous-takes-down-1000-israeli-government-business-websites-1457269

View article:
#OpSaveGaza: Anonymous Takes Down 1,000 Israeli Government and Business Websites

Yet ANOTHER IE 0-day hole found: Malware-flingers already using it for drive-by badness

You read that right: OPT OUT of a botnet by hitting Ctrl+Alt+Del Security researchers have discovered new zero-day vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer that are already being harnessed by hackers to run a new type of drive-by attack.…

Visit link:
Yet ANOTHER IE 0-day hole found: Malware-flingers already using it for drive-by badness