Tag Archives: ddos-attacks

DDoS attack on Pakistan Government Websites on Live Radio

Dozens of government websites in Pakistan have been targeted by hackers, including one military site that was taken down during a live radio interview with one of the group’s members. The organization responsible, known as New World Hackers, performed a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on Pakistan’s Frontier Constabulary website during an appearance on the AnonUK Radio Show on Sunday, following a weekend of sustained attacks on government sites. Dozens of government websites in Pakistan have been targeted by hackers, including one military site that was taken down during a live radio interview with one of the group’s members. The organization responsible, known as New World Hackers, performed a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on Pakistan’s Frontier Constabulary website during an appearance on the AnonUK Radio Show on Sunday, following a weekend of sustained attacks on government sites. “It’s not that the Indian hackers want to attack Pakistani sites, there is a war between them and the Pakistani hackers,” the New World Hackers member says. “We upgraded the capabilities of the Indian hackers. “The Pakistani hackers always wish to fuck with India. The Indian hackers are actually the good guys.” Pakistan’s Frontier Constabulary did not respond to a request for comment. Source: http://www.newsweek.com/hackers-take-down-pakistan-government-websites-live-radio-413888

Taken from:
DDoS attack on Pakistan Government Websites on Live Radio

Bitcoin exchange BTCC stands firm against DDoS ransom hacker and wins

Bitcoin exchange BTCC Technology Ltd. had an interesting time over the new year when it was targeted by a Bitcoin-for-DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack, but in a great story we don’t see often enough, the company held steady and won, complete with a hilarious ending. The company first came under DDoS attack on December 31 when they received an email from an unknown source demanding they pay 1 Bitcoin ($430) in ransom or the attacks would escalate. Having ignored the demand, on New Years Day BTCC was targeted with a 10 Gbps DDoS attack, the strength of which was not expected by the company’s DDoS mitigation service. According to a post on Reddit, the DDoS protection provider said something along the lines of “This thing is huge! You guys aren’t paying us enough for this!” so BTCC paid them more, and the site stayed up. Naturally, as these things go, the second attack was followed by a new ransom demand by the hacker, who was now asking for a payment of 10 Bitcoin ($4300) to prevent a further attack. Instead of paying, BTCC just battened down the hatches waiting for the next attack. Another, more intense DDoS attack of several hours then followed, causing BTCC’s servers to experience some performance issues, including a partial loss of functionality. BTCC still refused to pay the ransom and instead upgraded their servers to cope even better with the increasing attacks. Another ransom email demand was received, with demand for payment of 30 Bitcoins ($12924) with the hacker adding ““We will keep these attacks up until you pay!…. You had better pay up before you go bankrupt! Mwa ha ha!” BTCC once again ignored the demand, and the attacks recommenced, complete with more demands for Bitcoin. At this point BTCC had ramped up their mitigation efforts so much that no matter how much traffic the hacker sent it didn’t affect their service at all, to the point that the company stopped noticing many of the attacks as they usually failed to disrupt their networks for more than a few minutes after the upgrades they rolled out. Winning Around this point, despite his or hers best efforts and multiple demands, the hacker gave up trying to take the site down, but not before sending one last, hilarious plea to BTCC. “Hey, guys, look, I’m really a nice person. I don’t want to put you all out of business. What do you say we just make it 0.5 BTC and call it even?” This email was, like those before it, ignored by BTCC, which resulted in one final email from the now disgruntled, losing hacker: “Do you even speak English?” and that was that. Although DDoS attacks are serious business and not every company has the capacity to put into place defensive measures, sometimes a story just makes you want to smile. BTCC 1 vs hacker 0. Source: http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/01/06/great-story-bitcoin-exchange-btcc-stands-firm-against-ddos-ransom-hacker-and-wins/

Link:
Bitcoin exchange BTCC stands firm against DDoS ransom hacker and wins

BBC Websites, DDoS attack By Anti ISIS Hacking Group For Testing Their Capabilities

Hackers against the Islamic State or ISIS have claimed that the BBC website downtime during New Year’s Eve was their DDoS attack, but with no bad intentions. BBC websites were down for several hours during the evening before January 1, 2016. A company source inside BBC admitted that there was a distributed denial of service attack that took the websites down. Now, anti-ISIS hacker group named as New World Hacking is claiming that they were the reason why the BBC websites were unavailable for a quite long duration. However, they did not hack the website to cripple its capability to disseminate news and such. New World Hacking said that they were just testing their capabilities on BBC’s servers. They did not intend to take the site down for hours. “Let me get you proof of our records really quick, our motive was simply because we can. It was almost exactly a 600 GBps attack. We used two nodes to attack with and a few extra dedicated servers. It was only a test, we didn’t exactly plan to take it down for multiple hours. Our servers are quite strong,” the group told Rory Cellan-Jones from BBC via Twitter. DDoS Attacks In A Nutshell For the uninitiated, a DDoS attacks does not really involve a direct “hack” or penetration of a database, but it could be used as a cover. What happened was that the BBC websites experienced a massive flow of web traffic that came from the hacker group. The websites were not able to keep up with the continued barrage of web traffic, resulting it into shutting down. There are different types of DDoS attacks that can be carried out. Some of the attacks directly flood the websites with more traffic than it can handle. Some send only fragments of data packets, which usually leads to the server piecing it back together instead of catering to their legit site visitors. In order to conduct a successful DDoS attack, hackers usually use a wide network of computers known as botnets. These botnets may consist of their own computers or compromised ones across the globe using their own malware. Attack Only A Test, Not Malicious New World Hacking said that they are based in the United States and that they are determined to take down any ISIS affiliated sites and online accounts. Anonymous has previously declared a cyber-war against ISIS as they continuously help in taking down online propaganda and recruitment sites. BBC’s press office refused to comment on the hacker group’s claim. They also did not confirm nor deny if the DDoS attack was the cause of the website’s temporary downtime. “We realise sometimes what we do is not always the right choice, but without cyber hackers… who is there to fight off online terrorists? The reason we really targeted [the] BBC is because we wanted to see our actual server power,” the group told BBC. One person named Ownz from the hacker group said that they were only a team of 12 people. Eight of them were male and four of them were female. Ownz claims that New World Hacking was formed in 2012. Hacker groups are not new, but only a handful of them have actual good intentions. With ISIS trying to recruit followers and jihadists online, these hackers have stepped up to try and stop them from doing so. Some Internet users are cheering them on, while some have questioned their methods and capabilities. At the core, all the soldier deployed across the globe are considered heroes and not the hackers. New World Hacking Campaigns New World Hacking claims that they have already done their part in making the world a better and safer place. They took part in the #OpParis effort in order to help determine the identities of IS affiliated accounts after the terrible Paris attack tragedy in November 2015. Ownz also said that they took part in a campaign against the Ku Klux Klan. Ownz said that they are using a hacking tool named Bangstresser. They claim that they have already used the tool against several IS websites. Bangstresser was said to be developed by another U.S.-based hacker activist. New World Hacking tried out the tool against the BBC websites along with several of their personal computer servers and possibly botnets. Ownz told the BBC that they are planning to attack a new list of ISIS targets online. It is unclear which sites they are referring to, but they were not disclosed in order to help protect the integrity and effectiveness of their campaign. BBC Websites And Services Downtime BBC websites started to be down at around 7 PM on Thursday. Instead of the website interface, they were greeted with an error. In addition to the websites, their iPlayer Radio app and iPlayer catch-up service were also down. The iPlayer app was recently launched for the Apple TV App Store in December 2015. Twitter (NASDAQ: TWTR) users replied to the BBC Press Office’s announcement that they were aware of the “technical issue.” Some have said suggested that they should try turning their servers off and on again. Some have also taken the news in a lighter tone, saying that the HR department should be blamed for insisting the unused leaves be used before 2015 ended. Others took the chance to mock BBC, saying that they shouldn’t rush because they know BBC is telling the truth when they are silent. Other users have also asked if it was DDoS attack, but no replies were given by BBC. Some users have also reported that the BBC Bitesize and BBC Food recipes were down as well. BBC websites started to be back online at around 10:30 PM. However, some of the websites took longer than usual to load. All of the services and websites functioned normally several hours more after. New World Hacking did not say why they chose the BBC services and websites as a test target for their attacks. However, one possible reason is to demonstrate the scale and power of their attacks by attacking one of the most known broadcasting corporations in the world. Source: http://www.biztekmojo.com/001843/bbc-websites-services-taken-down-anti-isis-hacking-group-testing-their-capabilities

Continue Reading:
BBC Websites, DDoS attack By Anti ISIS Hacking Group For Testing Their Capabilities

BBC reports on BBC tweet about BBC websites DDoS

The BBC’s website and iPlayer service went down on Thursday morning following a cyber attack causing widespread panic on social media A BBC Technology journalist later posted an article on their website saying a “large web attack” had “knocked” their websites offline. Sources within the BBC said the sites were down “thanks to what is knows as a ‘distributed denial of service’ attack”. A National Crime Agency spokesperson said: “DDOS is a blunt form of attack which takes volume and not skill. It’s a very basic attack tool. One analogy is too many people trying to get through a revolving door at the same time so that the door gets stuck.” Social media reaction to the trouble was swift. Many urged the BBC to get the site back up quickly and lamented how long it was taking to fix the technical trouble. Among the Twitter users to pass comment was Stephen Fry. Professor Tim Watson, Director of Cyber Security at the University of Warwick, said: “The BBC site will expect lots of traffic and they are a high profile target so you would expect them to have all kind of protection against a DDos attack. “They will be used to having lots of visitors but usually people visit the site at different times and are not repeatedly asking for lots of information. “The way a DDos attack works is by having control of thousands or millions of computers on a ‘botnet’ – so as people get their computers compromised by visiting websites or clicking on malicious links in emails, they can be remotely controlled and then coordinated to all visit a website at the same time. “So you can have millions of computers all making repeated visits to the same page over and over again and that is how you flood a website to the point where legitimate users can’t get access.” Professor Watson said there are a number of ways big corporations can protect against these kind of attacks but they are expensive. One way of protecting a site is to have something called “fat pipes” – very large data cables capable of dealing with incredibly high amounts of traffic – combined with really fast computers which can filter out anything like DDos traffic and re-route legitimate traffic back to the main website. But Professor Watson asked: “Is it a good used of licence payers’ money to have fatter pipes just on the off chance that one day someone might want to take down the BBC website with a DDos attack?” Cyver security expert Professor Alan Woodward, from the University of Surrey, said an attack like this needs a “degree of coordination”. He said: “I would have thought this could have been so-called hacktivists. The bbc has a large and sophisticated structure themselves and I know they have systems in place to mitigate it so it might have been slightly more than the usual DDoS attack. I cant see why a cyber criminal would do this, they do this for money, the only people who do this to make a point are hacktivists. “You have these groups who are doing this to make a point. Nation states often have the capability to do it. The motives tend to be where you have some group like these active hacker squad, phantom squad and lizard squad who do it.” An official BBC spokesperson said the corporation “are not discussing the causes” of the shutdown “or going into any further detail”. The BBC’s main website is the 89th biggest in the world, according to web analytics firm Alexa, and is the seventh-ranked site in the UK. Twitter goes into meltdown As BBC technicians frantically attempted to work out how to get their website back up and running, Twitter users had a lot of fun as #BBCDown began trending. The corporation apologised for the inconvenience on a number of Twitter feeds, blaming the website and its iPlayer services going down for over an hour on a “technical issue”. It later emerged the corporation had suffered a DDoS – a distributed denial of service – attack. Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/bbc/12075679/BBC-website-crashes-and-Twitter-goes-into-meltdown.html

Excerpt from:
BBC reports on BBC tweet about BBC websites DDoS

Linode Hit by DDoS Attacks

Cloud hosting company Linode has suffered a series of service interruptions due to distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks launched against its infrastructure over the past few days. The campaign started on December 26 when the company reported that DDoS attacks had disrupted the Linode Manager and its website. On the same day, the attackers also targeted Linode’s DNS infrastructure, and the company’s data centers in Dallas, Atlanta, London and Newark. It took roughly 2-3 hours for Linode’s systems and network engineering teams and the company’s upstream providers to mitigate the attacks. On December 27, DDoS attacks were reported at the data centers in Atlanta, Newark, and London. Linode’s service status page shows that it took the company nearly four hours to mitigate the attack against the London datacenter, while network connectivity was restored in one hour, respectively two hours, in Atlanta and Newark. The attacks against various components of Linode’s infrastructure continued on Monday and Tuesday. In the early hours of Wednesday, shortly after announcing that a DDoS attack affecting Linode’s website had been mitigated, the company reported seeing continued attacks disrupting access to its web services. The latest update indicates that the Dallas data center was again targeted recently, causing packet loss. Kaspersky Lab reported in November that in the third quarter of 2015, Linux-based botnets accounted for nearly half of the total number of DDoS attacks. The most notable was the XOR botnet, which malicious actors leveraged to launch attacks that peaked at more than 150 Gbps. A Kaspersky report released in December showed that almost half of the organizations hit by DDoS attacks actually claimed to know the identity of the attackers. The study is based on information from more than 5,500 companies across 26 countries. Source: http://www.securityweek.com/linode-hit-ddos-attacks

Visit site:
Linode Hit by DDoS Attacks

Rutgers University Suffers Sixth DDoS Attack This Year

Three cyber-security firms could not handle the attack Rutgers University’s IT department has managed to restore all services after a large-scale DDoS attack kept some of its systems down for four days between December 24 and December 28. This is not the first time Rutgers University has been hit with a DDoS attack, having already reported on a similar incident back at the end of September . Earlier this year, at the end of March and start of May, university staff also suffered four similar attacks, with the longest one lasting for five full days. Sixth time this year, nobody has claimed responsibility yet The first five attacks were claimed by a hacker that went by the name of Exfocus, who admitted in an interview that he was hired via an underground forum to carry out the DDoS bombardment, and later paid in Bitcoin. Unlike in the case of the first five attacks, Exfocus has not come forward to claim responsibility. The Rutgers IT staff said the attack targeted the sakai.rutgers.edu URL, the University’s Sakai portal. Sakai is an open source, self-hosted Java-based course learning environment used primarily by academic institutions. The DDoS attack did not affect student activities since students are away for Christmas break, which started on December 24 and will end on January 5. A $3 million investment in IT security systems did not help at all Last August, Rutgers management spent $3 million / €2.67 million on security measures to bolster their online platform. According to NJ.com, the University hired three cyber-security firms. The unplanned investment was motivated by the March and May attacks. Despite this, the University’s DDoS mitigation provider has failed to live up to its job, both in September and in this most recent four-day-long attack. In his interview, Exfocus said that he controlled a botnet of 85,000 machines, and was able to launch DDoS attacks of around 25 Gbps, which is considered to be of a medium scale. The proper law enforcement agencies have been notified of the attack. Softpedia has reached out to Exfocus on Twitter. We’ll update the article if we uncover any new information. Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/rutgers-university-suffers-sixth-ddos-attack-this-year-498229.shtml

See more here:
Rutgers University Suffers Sixth DDoS Attack This Year

Moonfruit takes down thousands of sites after a DDoS attack

Moonfruit, a free website builder, has taken thousands of business and personal websites offline following a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. The company’s users are disappointed by the slow pace at which it has communicated the problem, and the way it’s being handled. The company said it had been threatened with a cyber-attack and had decided to make its customers’ websites unavailable for “up to 12 hours” to make infrastructure changes. In a statement on the Moonfruit website it was said that the company was actually attacked by a hacker group called the Armada Collective, which DDoSed the site for about 45 mintes. One business owner told the BBC it was “very bad timing”. Film-maker Reece de Ville said: “They have been slow to communicate via their website what is going on.” “I’m going to have hundreds of people finding my site today but not being able to access it. I could be losing out on a lot of money from potential clients, and they may not come back if they think the company has gone. It’s incredibly bad timing, especially for businesses selling Christmas cards and gifts on their website.” In an email to its customers, the company apologised for giving them “short notice” that their websites would be offline. “We have been working with law enforcement agencies regarding this matter and have spared no time or expense in ensuring we complete the work as quickly as possible,” the company’s director, Matt Casey, said in the official statement. Industry reaction Ron Symons, regional director at cyber security specialist A10 Networks said: “Moonfruit has responded in the best possible way to this threat by taking its services offline. As the attack it suffered last week shows, distributed denial of service (DDoS) is extremely difficult to prevent. More worryingly, DDoS attacks frequently act as smokescreens hiding more invasive attacks as hackers exploit unguarded system backdoors to steal sensitive data. “By making this bold decision to pre-empt another incident, Moonfruit stands a much better chance of protecting its clients’ private data. The shutdown may be inconvenient now, but by ensuring its infrastructure is equipped to deal with today’s increasingly powerful cyber attacks Moonfruit is acting in the best interests of those using its services.” SEE ALSO: Throwback Thursday: Why Apple is called Apple Dave Larson, Chief Operating Officer at Corero Network Security said: “Unfortunately, the sheer size and scale of hosting or data center operator network infrastructures and their massive customer base presents an incredibly attractive attack surface due to the multiple entry points and significant aggregate bandwidth that acts as a conduit for a damaging and disruptive DDoS attack. “As enterprises of all sizes increasingly rely on hosted critical infrastructure or services, they are placing themselves at even greater risk from these devastating DDoS attacks – even as an indirect target.” Source: http://www.itproportal.com/2015/12/14/moonfruit-takes-down-thousands-of-sites-after-a-ddos-attack/#ixzz3uLEOSJCP

Visit site:
Moonfruit takes down thousands of sites after a DDoS attack

Cyber criminals not to blame for all DDoS attacks, study shows

There is a real concern that many companies are being affected by the DDoS attacks commissioned by competitors, according to Kaspersky Lab Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are associated with criminal activity, but not all those behind DDoS attacks are cyber criminals, research has revealed. Nearly half of more than 5,500 companies polled in 26 countries claimed to know the identity and motivation behind recent DDoS attacks, and 12% named competitors as the most likely culprits. This suspicion increases in the business services industry, with 38% of respondents in this sector believing their competitors were behind a DDoS attack, according to a survey by Kaspersky Lab and B2B International. However, 18% attributed recent DDoS attacks to criminals seeking to disrupt or distract while another attack took place; 17% to criminals seeking to disrupt their services for a ransom; 11% to political activists; and 5% to state-sponsored activities. The most popular motivation for the attacks is believed to be a ransom, cited by 27% of respondents in the manufacturing and telecoms sectors. “DDoS attacks are no longer just about cyber criminals seeking to halt a company’s operations,” said Evgeny Vigovsky, head of DDoS protection at Kaspersky Lab. “Businesses are becoming suspicious of each other, and there is a real concern that many companies – including small and medium ones – are being affected by the underhanded tactics of their competitors, which are commissioning DDoS attacks directly against them, damaging their operations and reputation,” he said. In the light of this trend, Vigovsky said all businesses should remain vigilant and fully understand the repercussions of a DDoS attack in terms of the potential financial and reputational damage. “It is wise not to pay a ransom, or to fall victim to cyber criminals or competitors. Ensure that you have the appropriate security measures in place to help manage the increased risk posed to your business from DDoS attacks,” he said. Looking ahead to 2016, security firms expect to see an increase in the tactic of using DDoS attacks to distract companies from other, more damaging malicious activity on their networks, such as data theft. The use of DDoS, or the threat of DDoS attacks, as a way of extorting money is also expected to continue and increase in the coming year. According to the study, 20% of companies with 50 employees or more reported that they have been the victim of at least one DDoS attack, with companies in the telecoms, financial services and IT sectors the most likely to be targeted. The study also revealed that 50% of DDoS attacks led to a noticeable disruption of services; 26% led to the loss of sensitive data; 24% led to services being completely unavailable; and 74% led to a noticeable disruption of service, which coincided with a different type of security incident, such as a malware attack, network intrusion or other type of attack. According to Kaspersky Lab, the average cost for recovering from a DDoS attack for companies of more than 1,500 employees is $417,000, and $53,000 for small and medium businesses (SMBs). Yet 56% of those polled thought that spending money to prevent or mitigate DDoS attacks in future would be worth the investment, 53% said their organisation knew how to mitigate or prevent DDoS attacks, and only 52% felt well-informed about DDoS attacks. Despite the cost and complexity of dealing with DDoS attacks, the Kaspersky Lab research said the average financial damage of a DDoS attack is significant, especially for SMBs, and is definitely higher than the cost of a service designed to reduce the effect of such attacks. “DDoS prevention is almost always a third-party service, and outsourcing this trouble to experts not only reduces the damage but also frees up IT personnel to deal with a probable complementary attack on a company infrastructure, which will have much worse consequences,” the report said. Source: http://www.computerweekly.com/news/4500260544/Cyber-criminals-not-to-blame-for-all-DDoS-attacks-study-shows

Taken from:
Cyber criminals not to blame for all DDoS attacks, study shows

Mysterious hackers attempting to bring down entire internet by DDoS-ing critical servers

Mysterious hackers are yet again trying to bring down the entire internet by bombarding crucial servers that support it with a gigantic, sustained distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, which has caused webpages to load slowly in some locations. There are 13 internet root name servers in the world that run the internet, and these servers are responsible for helping your web browser to locate top-level domains such as .com, .org, .net or any country-specific top level domains like .uk, .fr, .sg, .de, .ae and .cn. The servers function as a sort of internet address book and they make up what is known as the domain name system (DNS) system. The 13 root name servers are run by independent organisations in the world, including ICANN, the US Army, the US Department of Defense, Nasa, Europe’s internet registry RIPE NCC, the University of Southern California, Japan’s Wide Project and Sweden’s Netnod. Network infrastructure solutions firm Verisign also operates two of them, namely the “A” and “J” root servers (the 13 servers are named in sequence after the alphabet from A-M). DDoS attack sent 5 million queries per second The 13 root name servers are run by independent organisations in the world, including ICANN, the US Army, the US Department of Defense, Nasa, Europe’s internet registry RIPE NCC, the University of Southern California, Japan’s Wide Project and Sweden’s Netnod. Network infrastructure solutions firm Verisign also operates two of them, namely the “A” and “J” root servers (the 13 servers are named in sequence after the alphabet from A-M). “The incident traffic saturated network connections near some DNS root name server instances. This resulted in timeouts for valid, normal queries to some DNS root name servers from some locations.” You might think that the servers would be knocked offline by that much traffic, but no, they were saved by the root server operators having enough additional servers on standby that were able to balance the load of traffic. Although the sustained cyberattack resulted in some real queries from users surfing the web timing out in some locations, there were no complaints that end-users were having severe internet problems, so the root server operators believe that the attack would have been “barely perceptible” and all anyone would have seen was a slight delay in loading webpages in some web browsers. The root name server operators also stated that since IP source addresses can be easily spoofed and the traffic flooded multiple anycast websites, it is impossible to trace the traffic back to its source, so we have no idea who was behind this. Only a government could have this much clout However, if you use logic, it would take a really powerful entity like a country’s government to have the resources to sustain a coordinated cyberattack that lasted 48 hours and was able to keep flooding the root name servers consistently with a high level of traffic at five million queries a second. This is not the first time this has happened either – on 21 October 2002 a DDoS attack campaign attacked the 13 root name servers for one hour, and on 6 February 2007 a DDoS attack was sustained for 24 hours. In the first incident, the attackers didn’t have enough traffic to fully flood the servers and take them offline, while the second incident saw two root servers suffer badly, while another two servers experienced heavy traffic. So who could it be? Is it a foreign government, a terrorist group or cybercriminals? Who knows, but they seem to be getting better at it. Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/mysterious-hackers-are-trying-bring-down-entire-internet-by-ddos-ing-critical-servers-1532762

Visit link:
Mysterious hackers attempting to bring down entire internet by DDoS-ing critical servers

Abe’s official website latest to come under possible cyber attack by Anonymous

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe may have had his official website attacked by the ‘hacktivist’ Anonymous group, local media reported Thursday. According to Japan’s public NHK broadcaster, Abe’s official website has been inaccessible since early on Thursday, with the international group of clandestine hackers knows as Anonymous allegedly posting a message on Twitter claiming responsibility for the cyber attack on the site. Abe’s top spokesperson, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga, said the government had been informed about the possible breach to the prime minister’s site by Anonymous, but in a press conference earlier Thursday declined to comment specifically as to whether the attack had been carried out by Anonymous. The possible attack by Anonymous is the latest in a series of cyber attacks on Japanese websites, including most recently last month on the website of Japan’s Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, which went down for three days after the group, according to its Twitter post, disabled the site by flooding it with enough data to crash its servers. As with the latest case, the Tokyo Metropolitan Police have been on high alert, although the government is either unaware or is remaining tight-lipped about the motive for the recent attacks, according to sources close to the matter Thursday. The group also took aim at Japan on Oct. 10 this year, when both Narita and Chubu airports in the east of the country, came under DDoS attacks with Anonymous saying on Twitter the attacks were a part of their campaign against Japan’s controversial dolphin hunting practice. The town of Taiji in southeastern Japan where the drive hunts take place saw its official website also taken down earlier in the year with police concluding that the hactivist group was responsible. The Japan National Tourism Organization and Japan’s Fishermen’s Union’s websites have also suffered DDoS attacks, for Japan’s continued dolphin hunts, it has been reported. Prior to these, in 2012, the government was also subjected to a series of cyber attacks by Anonymous following the implementation of new ant-piracy laws by the government, which outline stiff fines and jail terms for those downloading copyrighted content. The group highlight the fact that content suppliers were pressuring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to implement surveillance technology in an unprecedented move that some felt impinged on privacy laws. As a result, the Finance Ministry, Supreme Court, the then ruling Democratic Party of Japan and Liberal Democratic Party of Japan all saw their sites attacked at the time, some with specific pages defaced. Source: http://www.ecns.cn/2015/12-10/192047.shtml