Tag Archives: defend against ddos

The evolution of DDoS attacks – and defences

Aatish Pattni, regional director, UK & Ireland, Link11, explores in Information Age how DDoS attacks have grown in size and sophistication over the last two decades. What is the biggest cyber-threat to your company? In April 2018, the UK’s National Crime Agency answered that question by naming DDoS attacks as the joint leading threat facing businesses, alongside ransomware. The NCA noted the sharp increase in DDoS attacks on a range of organisations during 2017 and into 2018, and advised organisations to take immediate steps to protect themselves against the potential attacks. It’s no surprise that DDoS is seen as such a significant business risk. Every industry sector is now reliant on web connectivity and online services. No organisation can afford to have its systems offline or inaccessible for more than a few minutes: business partners and consumers expect seamless, 24/7 access to services, and being forced offline costs a company dearly. A Ponemon Institute study found that each DDoS incident costs $981,000 on average, including factors such as lost sales and productivity, the effect on customers and suppliers, the cost of restoring IT systems, and brand damage. So how have DDoS attacks evolved from their early iterations as stunts used by attention-seeking teens, to one of the biggest threats to business? What techniques are attackers now using, and how can organisations defend themselves? Early days of DDoS The first major DDoS attack to gain international attention was early in 2000, launched by a 15-year-old from Canada who called himself Mafiaboy. His campaign effectively broke the internet, restricting access to the web’s most popular sites for a full week, including Yahoo!, Fifa.com, Amazon.com, eBay, CNN, Dell, and more. DDoS continued to be primarily a tool for pranks and small-scale digital vandalism until 2007, when a range of Estonian banking, news, and national government websites were attacked. The attack sparked nationwide riots and is widely regarded as one of the world’s first nation-state acts of cyberwar. The technique is also successful as a diversion tactic, to draw the attention of IT and security teams while a second attack is launched: another security incident accompanies up to 75% of DDoS attacks. Denial of service has also been used as a method of protest by activist groups including Anonymous and others, to conduct targeted take-downs of websites and online services. Anonymous has even made its attacks tools freely available for anyone to use. Recent years have also seen the rise of DDoS-on-demand services such as Webstresser.org. Before being shut down by international police, Webstresser offered attack services for as little as £11, with no user expertise required – yet the attacks were powerful enough to disrupt operations at seven of the UK’s biggest banks. Amplified and multi-vector attacks In October 2016, a new method for distributing DoS attacks emerged – using a network of Internet of Things (IoT) devices to amplify attacks. The first of these, the Mirai botnet infected thousands of insecure IoT devices to power the largest DDoS attack witnessed at the time, with volumes over a Terabyte. By attacking Internet infrastructure company Dyn, Mirai brought down Reddit, Etsy, Spotify, CNN and the New York Times. This was just a signpost showing how big attacks could become. In late February 2018, developer platform Github was hit with a 1.35 Tbps attack, and days later a new record was set with an attack volume exceeding 1.7 Tbps. These massive attacks were powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and self-learning algorithms which amplified their scale, giving them the ability to disrupt the operations of any organisation, of any size. Attacks are not only getting bigger but are increasingly multi-vector. In Q4 2017, Link11 researchers noted that attackers are increasingly combining multiple DDoS attack techniques. Over 45% of attacks used 2 or more different techniques, and for the first time, researchers saw attacks which feature up to 12 vectors. These sophisticated attacks are difficult to defend against, and even low-volume attacks can cause problems, as happened in early 2018 when online services from several Dutch banks, financial and government services were brought to a standstill. Staying ahead of next-generation AI-based attacks As DDoS attacks now have such massive scale and complexity, traditional DDoS defences can no longer withstand them. Firewalls, special hardware appliances and intrusion detection systems are the main pillars of protection against DDoS, but these all have major limitations. Current attack volume levels can easily overload even high-capacity firewalls or appliances, consuming so many resources that that reliable operation is no longer possible. Extortion by DDoS The next iteration of attackers set out to use DDoS as an extortion tool, threatening organisations with an overwhelming attack unless they meet the attacker’s demand for cryptocurrency. Notable extortionists included the original Armada Collective, which targeted banks, web hosting providers, data centre operators as well as e-commerce and online marketing agencies in Greece and Central Europe. Between January and March 2018, Link11’s Security Operation Centre recorded 14,736 DDoS attacks, an average of 160 attacks per day, with multiple attacks exceeding 100 Gbps. Malicious traffic at these high volumes can simply flood a company’s internet bandwidth, rendering on-premise network security solutions useless. What’s needed is to deploy a cloud-native solution that can use AI to filter, analyse, and block web traffic if necessary before it even reaches a company’s IT systems. This can be done by routing the company’s Internet traffic via an external, cloud-based protection service. With this approach, incoming traffic is subject to granular analysis, with the various traffic types being digitally ‘fingerprinted’. Each fingerprint consists of hundreds of properties, including browser data, user behaviour, and its origin. The solution builds up an index of both normal and abnormal, or malicious traffic fingerprints. When known attack patterns are detected in a traffic flow, the attack ‘client’ is blocked immediately and automatically in the cloud, before it even reaches customers’ networks – so that only clean; legitimate traffic reaches the organisation. However, regular traffic is still allowed, enabling a business to continue unaffected, without users being aware of the filtering process. The solution’s self-learning AI algorithms also help to identify and block attacks for which there is no current fingerprint within a matter of seconds, to minimise the impact on the organisation’s website or web services. This means each new attack helps the system improve its detection capabilities, for the benefit of all users. Furthermore, this automated approach to blocking attacks frees up IT and security teams, enabling them to focus on more strategic work without being distracted by DDoS attempts. In conclusion, DDoS attacks will continue to evolve and grow, simply because with DDoS-for-hire services and increasingly sophisticated methods, they are relatively easy and cheap to do – and they continue to be effective in targeting organisations. But by understanding how attacks are evolving and implementing the protective measures described here, organisations will be better placed to deny DDoS attackers. Source: https://www.information-age.com/evolution-of-ddos-123473947/

Department of Labour denies server compromise in recent cyberattack

The government department says the attack did not expose any sensitive or confidential information. The South African Department of Labour has confirmed a recent cyberattack which disrupted the government agency’s website. In a statement, the Department of Labour said that a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack was launched against the organization’s front-facing servers over the weekend. According to the department’s acting chief information officer Xola Monakali, the “attempt was through the external Domain Name Server (DNS) server which is sitting at the State Information Technology Agency,” and “no internal servers, systems, or client information were compromised, as they are separated with the relevant protection in place.” The government agency has asked external cybersecurity experts to assist in the investigation. DDoS attacks are often launched through botnets, which contain countless enslaved devices — ranging from standard PCs to IoT devices — which are commanded to flood a domain with traffic requests. When the volume reaches peak levels, this can prevent legitimate traffic from being able to access the same resource, leading to service disruption. Some of the worst we have seen in recent times include the Mirai botnet, made up of millions of compromised IoT devices, which was powerful enough to disrupt online services across an entire country. With the rapid adoption of IoT and connected devices, including mobile products, routers, smart lighting and more, botnets have become more powerful. Unfortunately, many of our IoT products lag behind in security and the use of lax or default credentials, open ports, and unpatched firmware has led to botnets which automatically scan for vulnerable devices online and add them to the slave pool with no-one the wiser. In July, a threat actor was able to create a botnet 18,000 device-strong in only 24 hours. The botnet scanned the Internet for connected devices left unpatched against Huawei router vulnerability CVE-2017-17215. It is not known who is behind the DDoS attack against the government agency. However, News24 reports that hacker “Paladin” may be responsible. The individual reportedly tipped off reporters that the attack was taking place as a test for a “full-scale attack” due to take place in the future against another government website. Paladin is also believed to be responsible for DDoS attacks launched against SA Express, the country’s Presidency domain, and the Department of Environmental Affairs. Source: https://www.zdnet.com/article/department-of-labour-denies-server-compromise-in-recent-cyberattack/

View the original here:
Department of Labour denies server compromise in recent cyberattack

How to Protect Businesses Against DDoS Attacks

Security, for any business today, is important; we, at HackerCombat, have already reported on the rising costs of IT security on the global level. More and more business today invest heavily in security; they have started realizing that without security, it’s almost impossible for any business to flourish in today’s circumstances. We have arrived at a stage when businesses cannot handle security by simply relying on their ISPs. Proactive measures that businesses adopt for ensuring proper and better security really counts. Businesses today are often targeted by DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks, planned and executed by cybercriminals all the world over. Hence it becomes important that every business today is armed, in all ways possible, to combat DDoS attacks, in the most effective of manners. Let’s discuss how businesses can secure themselves against such attacks. Let’s begin by discussing how DDoS attacks happen and what they are, in the first place… DDoS Attacks: An Introduction The basic principle of a DDoS attack is this- a very large number of requests are sent from several points targeting a network or server, and that too in a very short span of time. This kind of bombardment causes an overload on the server, which consequently leads to the exhaustion of its resources. The obvious result is that the server would fail and sometime would even become inaccessible, thereby causing a total denial of service, hence the name Distributed Denial of Service attack. The main issue, however, is not that the server or network becomes inaccessible; on the other hand, it pertains to the security of the data stored in the network. A DDoS attack makes a server vulnerable and hackers can penetrate the information system and cause huge losses to the business that’s targeted. The cybercriminals behind a DDoS attack can thus make big money at the expense of the company that’s targeted. The motives behind DDoS attacks vary; such attacks could be carried out for political or financial gains, while some such attacks would have retaliation as the sole purpose. Those who look for political gains would target those who hold contradicting political, social or religious beliefs. Crippling them through a well-planned and well-executed DDoS attack would be the motive here. Retaliatory attacks happen when a botnet or a large cybercriminal network is dismantled and those who stood by the authorities need to be targeted. DDoS attacks that are carried out for financial gains follow a simple pattern. Those who want a business targeted would hire the services of cybercriminals who would carry out the DDoS attack. The hackers are paid for the work they do. Well, irrespective of the motive, the end result for the business that’s targeted is always the same. The network and online services become unavailable, sometimes for a short period and sometimes for a really long period of time, and data security also is at risk. How to protect a business from DDoS attacks ISPs may offer layer 3 and layer 4 DDoS protection, which would help businesses save themselves from many volumetric attacks. But most such ISPs fail when it comes to detecting small, layer 7 attacks. That’s why it’s said that businesses should not depend on their ISPs alone for protecting themselves against DDoS attacks. They should be set to implement measures that ensure comprehensive protection against DDoS attacks. Here’s a look at the different things that need to be done to combat DDoS attacks in the most effective of manners: Go for a good solution provider- There are many service providers who provide Layer 3, 4 and 7 protection against DDoS attacks. There are providers of all kinds, ranging from those that offer low-cost solutions for small websites to those that provide multiple coverages for large enterprises. Most of them would offer custom pricing option, based on your requirements. If yours is a large organization, they would offer advanced layer 7 discovery services with sensors to be installed in your data center. Well, always go for a good provider of security solutions, as per your needs. Always have firewall or IPS installed- Modern firewall software and IPS (Intrusion Prevention Systems) claim to provide a certain level of protection against DDoS attacks. The New Generation Firewalls offers both DDoS protection as well as IPS services and thus would suffice to protect you against most DDoS attacks. There, of course, are some other aspects that need to be kept in mind. Your New Generation Firewall might get overwhelmed by volumetric attacks and might not even suffice for layer 7 detections. Similarly, enabling DDoS protection on your firewall or IPS could even impact the overall performance of your system/network in an adverse manner. Use dedicated appliances that fight DDoS attacks- Today, there are many hardware devices that protect you from DDoS attacks. Some of these provide protection against layer 3 and 4 attacks while some advanced ones give protection against layer 7 DDoS attacks. Such appliances are deployed at the main point of entry for all web traffic and they monitor all incoming and outgoing network traffic. They can detect and block layer 7 threats. There are two versions of these hardware solutions- one for enterprises and the other for telecom operators. The ones for enterprises are cost-effective ones while the ones for providers are too expensive. Investing in getting such hardware appliances would always be advisable. It’s always good to go for devices that use behavior-based adaptation methods to identify threats. These appliances would help protect from unknown zero-day attacks since there is no need to wait for the signature files to be updated. Remember, for any organization, big or small, it’s really important today to be prepared to combat DDoS attacks. For any organization that has a web property, the probability of being attacked is higher today than ever before. Hence, it’s always good to stay prepared. Prevention, as they say, is always better than cure! Source: https://hackercombat.com/how-to-protect-businesses-against-ddos-attacks/

Visit link:
How to Protect Businesses Against DDoS Attacks

Online Poker Sites Suffer DDoS Attacks

The online poker industry has recently been plagued by a spate of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, with three highly popular gaming websites being impacted by the onslaught. Initial reports of the attacks emerged on US-facing America’s Card Room on Sunday, August 5, which coincided with the beginning of the brand’s Mini Online Super Series (MOSS) tournament. The MOSS series offered guaranteed wins of $10 million, but the operator had no choice but to cancel several of its tournaments throughout the event as a result of the DDoS attacks. Popular Canadian-operated site PokerStars and its fellow platform partypoker would shortly become the next targets. Denial of Service attacks are cyber-attacks in which criminals aim to make a machine or network unavailable to its users by indefinitely disrupting service provision of a host connected to the web. Next In the Hit-Line The attacks are carried out by overwhelming the target network with superfluous requests, which overload its system and make it unable to fulfill legitimate requests from customers. The ‘distributed’ part comes in when the flood of superfluous requests stem from multiple sources. This essentially makes it impossible to halt the attack by blocking a single request source. On August 9, partypoker tournaments were stopped and cancelled after players began to complain of connectivity issues. The brand later confirmed that it was indeed DDoS attacks that had disrupted the tourneys, with Managing Director Tom Waters issuing an apology and an explanation on the site’s blog. In the post, Waters confirmed that the third-party attacks lasted for several hours, and caused problems like in-play pauses and an inability for players to log into the site’s software. He also assured customers that the operator’s team is working with a DDoS mitigation service provider to remove the risks of similar future events. Players Blinded Down Then, on Sunday, August 12, PokerStars became the latest victim to undergo DDoS attacks, with reports of technical difficulties beginning to flood in. It was on this day that several tournaments, including the brand’s popular Sunday Million, were set to be hosted – but they were interrupted and stopped across its European network and its Indian and Italian domains. With the bulk of tournament players sitting out and unable to connect, players in other connected countries were able to steal the blinds of the absent players until The Stars Group cancelled all of the tournaments. Players were automatically paid out according to their chip counts at the time of cancellation, which elicited many complaints from those players who were blinded down to a smaller stack. PokerStars has since assured its customers that they will be refunded based on their stacks at the time when the first disconnection began. Currently, the industry has not undergone any further attacks, but only time will tell if DDoS attacks will continue to wound the market – and how sites will work to prevent further disruptions and address players’ concerns about this worrisome issue. Source: https://www.gamingpost.ca/canadian-poker-news/online-poker-sites-suffer-ddos-attacks/

More:
Online Poker Sites Suffer DDoS Attacks

DDoS Attack Volume Rose 50% in Q2 2018

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks aimed at disruption remain a massive problem for businesses big and small, despite the shutdown of the Webstresser DDoS-for-hire service. Attackers are also increasingly striking outside of normal business hours, researchers have found. A new report shows attack volumes rose 50% to an average 3.3 Gbps during May, June and July 2018, from 2.2 Gbps in Q1. Despite a 36% decrease in the overall number of attacks – likely as a result of DDoS-as-a-service website Webstresser being shuttered in an international police operation – attack volumes increased. 46% of incidents used two or more vectors in Q2, with a total of 9,325 attacks recorded during the quarter. That’s 102 per day, on average. A 50% increase in hyper-scale attacks (80 Gbps+) was also recorded, while the most complex attacks used 13 vectors in total, researchers found. Broadly speaking, DDoS attacks can be divided into three main categories, which point to the attack vectors employed by bad actors: Volume Based Attacks – bad actors saturate the bandwidth of the attacked site (measured in bits per second / Bps) Protocol Attacks – attackers consume actual server resources (measured in packets per second / Pps). Application Layer Attacks – hackers seek to crash the web server (measured in requests per second / Rps) High-volume attacks were assisted by Memcached reflection, SSDP reflection and CLDAP. The highest attack bandwidth was recorded at 156 Gbps (gigabits per second), while the total duration of attacks during the quarter was 1,221 hours. Attackers used two vectors 17% of the time, and three vectors 16% of the time. The most-frequently observed attacks were UDP floods (59.7%), TCP SYN floods (3.3%) and ICMP floods (0.9%). 773 attacks used the Memcached reflection amplification technique, while the SSDP reflection technique generated the greatest proportion of DDoS packets. New data from a similar study, by Nexusguard, recently showed that the number of unguarded Memcached servers is dropping, yet many remain vulnerable to attacks. The same research uncovered that DNS amplification attacks have increased 700% worldwide since 2016 and, in the first quarter of 2018, 55 DNS amplification attacks relied on vulnerable Memcached servers to amplify their DDoS efficiency by a factor of 51,000. Source: https://securityboulevard.com/2018/08/ddos-attack-volume-rose-50-in-q2-2018/

Lawmakers want to know when Ajit Pai knew FCC’s cyberattack claim was false

Democratic lawmakers want to know why the agency didn’t inform consumers of the falsity of its claim sooner A group of House democrats want to know when FCC Chairman Ajit Pai knew that the agency’s claims of a DDoS attack were false. Last week, the FCC’s Office of Inspector General released a report that found no evidence to support the claims of DDoS attacks in May of 2017. The agency had previously blamed multiple DDoS attacks for temporarily taking down a comment section of its website following a segment of Last Week Tonight, in which comedian John Oliver asked viewers to submit comments to the FCC and speak out in support of net neutrality. However, viewers were unable to voice their opinion on the proposed rollback of net neutrality because the comment submission section wasn’t available at the time. Now that it has come to light that the agency’s claims of a DDoS attack were false, a handful of Democratic lawmakers want to know when Pai became aware that there was no DDoS attack and why the agency didn’t correct its public statements alleging a DDoS attack before now. Misrepresented facts “We want to know when you and your staff first learned that the information the Commission shared about the alleged cyberattack was false,” Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to Pai. “It is troubling that you allowed the public myth created by the FCC to persist and your misrepresentations to remain uncorrected for over a year,” they wrote. The letter was signed by Representatives Frank Pallone Jr. (NJ), Mike Doyle (PA), Jerry McNerney (CA) and Debbie Dingell (MI). The results of the investigation concluded that FCC officials deliberately misrepresented facts in responses to Congressional inquiries. “Given the significant media, public and Congressional attention this alleged cyberattack received for over a year, it is hard to believe that the release of the IG’s report was the first time that you and your staff realized that no cyberattack occurred,” wrote the lawmakers. “Such ignorance would signify a dereliction of your duty as the head of the FCC, particularly due to the severity of the allegations and the blatant lack of evidence.” The Democratic lawmakers have asked Pai for complete written responses to their questions by August 28. Pai is also scheduled to appear before a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee oversight hearing on Thursday where he is expected to face questions about the results of the investigation. Source: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/lawmakers-want-to-know-when-ajit-pai-knew-fccs-cyberattack-claim-was-false-081518.html

The complete guide to understanding web applications security

MODERN businesses use web applications every day to do different things, from interacting and engaging with customers to supporting sales and operations. As a result, web applications are rich with data and critical to the functioning of the company – which means, special precautions must be taken in order to protect them from hackers. However, not all organizations or their applications are subject to the same level of threats and attacks. In an exclusive interview with Gartner’s Research Director Dale Gardner, Tech Wire Asia learns how businesses can best protect their web applications. Gartner splits attacks on web and mobile applications and web APIs into four categories: # 1 | Denial of service (DoS) DoS is a specific subtype of abuse where the attacker’s goal is to disrupt the availability of the web application or service. In particular, this attack type covers volumetric attacks, which overwhelm network capabilities, and so-called “low and slow” attacks, which overwhelm application or service resources. # 2 | Exploits Exploits take advantage of design, code or configuration issues that cause unintended behaviour of the application. Some common examples include SQL Injection (SQLi), cross-site scripting (XSS), buffer overflows, and various Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) manipulation attacks. # 3 | Abuse Abuse covers many non-exploit types of attack that primarily take advantage of business logic. This includes scraping, aggregating, account brute-forcing, scalping, spamming and other — often automated — scenarios. # 4 | Access Access violations occur when an attacker or legitimate user takes advantage of weaknesses in the authentication (AuthN) or authorization (AuthZ) policies of a web application or service. Of the four categories, Gardner says only exploits can be potentially addressed with secure coding and configuration. The others require design-level considerations that cannot be reasonably compensated for in code. For example, although it’s arguably possible to defend against account takeovers in individual application code, it is much more economical and error-proof to do so in the identity and access management (IAM) system or another external capability. In an ideal world, the highest level of protection would be available at all times or as needed, but this isn’t feasible due to complexity and cost factors. And continuously providing the highest level of protection to all web assets can be an expensive proposition, both from economic and operational perspectives. Securing web applications and web APIs from attacks and abuse requires businesses to assess what level of protection is necessary. “Security teams must first pick a protection baseline. Then they must decide what extra protections are necessary to apply to specific assets,” recommends Gardner. When thinking of protecting web applications, security teams often first look to existing network technologies, such as next-generation firewall (NGFW) platforms and intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPSs). But these do not provide strong-enough capabilities in any of the protection areas, warns Gardner. They are not easily integrated to intercept TLS and do not have the same signatures, rules, behavioral analysis and business logic insight as security solutions that focus on web applications and APIs. Organizations often first look at a “completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart” (CAPTCHA) when they suffer from abuse of functionality. But an always-on CAPTCHA creates user-experience hurdles for legitimate users, and it is also no guarantee to keep the abuser out (attackers keep finding ways to circumvent or solve many CAPTCHAs). Multifactor authentication (MFA) and out of band (OOB) challenges are often used to enable strong access control, as well as to try to thwart abuse. Unfortunately, they suffer from similar issues as CAPTCHA, and in addition are often complex and expensive to implement. Currently, no single security platform or solution implements the highest possible level of protection in each of the exploit, abuse of functionality, access violation and DoS mitigation categories. Some organizations will still be able to start with a single solution to address the biggest potential risks. But they often find themselves needing greater security capabilities over time due to changes in threats and the application landscape. Web application firewalls (WAFs) are broadly deployed, but buyers routinely express disappointment and frustration over factors such as accuracy, the ability to prevent attacks, the administrative overhead required to maintain attack detection profiles and price. Incumbent vendors have begun addressing emerging requirements, but many products still lag. The market for solutions to protect web applications will continue to grow, but given buyer dissatisfaction, vendors with innovative approaches and new product packaging will capture the bulk of new spending. Buyers are shifting to service-based offerings, and demand for infrastructure as a service (IaaS) deployable products is growing. These shifts pose risks, especially to incumbents, but also present opportunities for new offerings and greater growth. Gartner believes that by 2020, stand-alone WAF hardware appliances will represent less than 20 percent of new WAF deployments, down from 40 percent today. By 2020, more than 50 percent of public-facing web applications will be protected by cloud-based WAAP services that combine content delivery networks, DDoS protection, bot mitigation and WAFs, which is an increase from fewer than 20 percent today. Web applications, mobile applications, and web APIs are subject to increased numbers and complexity of attacks. Gardner, who will be speaking at the Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit in Sydney later this month explains what organizations must keep in mind when planning and implementing solutions: Public, limited-access external, and internal applications require different levels of security. No one capability covers all types of attack. No two capabilities have interchangeable protection efficacy. Some of the capabilities have strong overlaps in addressing specific attack subcategories. Enforcement of policy may be centralized or distributed (for example, use of micro-gateways). “As a result, a mix of capabilities, though not necessarily separate products, have to be put in place as a layered approach,” concludes Gardener. Considering the range of exploits and abuse that can occur with web and mobile applications and web APIs, technical professionals must leverage a mix of externalized security controls to deliver appropriate protection and alleviate burdens to development staff. Source: https://techwireasia.com/2018/08/the-complete-guide-to-understanding-web-applications-security/

Continue Reading:
The complete guide to understanding web applications security

CERT issues cyber attack warning for India

Malware Reaper is acquiring internet-connected devices for coordinated attack, say State Cyber Police Mumbai: The Maharashtra Cyber Department is in the process of issuing a State-wide advisory outlining steps to prevent potential targets from falling prey after the New Delhi-based Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) said it has received intelligence inputs about a massive cyber attack on several countries, including India. The CERT is the country’s central cyber security agency. Maharashtra Cyber Police officers confirmed to The Hindu that the attack would be similar to the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attack that hit the State last year. In July 2016, The Hindu had reported how small and medium Internet Service Providers were under attack from unknown parties, who were pinging their servers incessantly to the point where the servers crashed, denying service to their clients and causing loss of revenue. According to sources, the imminent DDOS attack, which is believed to be on a much larger scale, is being readied using malware known by two names, Reaper and IoTroop, and is currently taking over thousands of machines connected to the internet to be used for a synchronised attack on the target servers. Maharashtra IG (Cyber) Brijesh Singh said, “Mirai had acquired five lakh devices. The Reaper malware has already affected two million devices worldwide, and is acquiring 10,000 devices per day. It seems to be targeting CCTV camera systems and Digital Video Recorders connected to the internet.” Bot attack A Cyber Police officer said, “It’s difficult to say at this point exactly who the targets are, but we have enough information to indicate that machines connected to the internet, including cell phones, laptops, CCTV cameras and other devices, are susceptible. A large number of such machines are being hacked and turned into bots as we speak. Our cyber intelligence network indicates a lot of abnormal behaviour on the internet, consistent with hacking of devices.” A bot, or robot, is an automated programme. In this kind of cyber attack, hackers use malware to infect devices to turn them into bots that do their bidding. Sources said the perpetrators of Reaper are currently creating a huge network of bots, called a botnet in cyberspeak. In October 2016, a malware known as Mirai had executed multiple DDOs attacks on servers of Dyn, a leading domain name service provider, affecting several popular websites including Twitter, Netflix and Reddit. Cyber Police officers said Reaper is amassing bots on a much larger scale than Mirai. “Once the botnet is ready as per the perpetrators’ requirements, they simply have to command the bots to ping servers of the target all at once, resulting in a server crash. Depending on the size of the company or industry targeted, it will result in massive losses of revenue.” A possible way to execute the attack would be that the bots are pre-programmed to strike on a particular day. This possibility is also being probed, officers said. Superintendent of Police Balsing Rajput, Maharashtra Cyber Police, confirmed that intelligence inputs about Reaper have been received. “We are working on the information and will soon be coming out with an advisory regarding the same.” Source: Malware Reaper is acquiring internet-connected devices for coordinated attack, say State Cyber Police Mumbai: The Maharashtra Cyber Department is in the process of issuing a State-wide advisory outlining steps to prevent potential targets from falling prey after the New Delhi-based Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) said it has received intelligence inputs about a massive cyber attack on several countries, including India. The CERT is the country’s central cyber security agency. Maharashtra Cyber Police officers confirmed to The Hindu that the attack would be similar to the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attack that hit the State last year. In July 2016, The Hindu had reported how small and medium Internet Service Providers were under attack from unknown parties, who were pinging their servers incessantly to the point where the servers crashed, denying service to their clients and causing loss of revenue. According to sources, the imminent DDOS attack, which is believed to be on a much larger scale, is being readied using malware known by two names, Reaper and IoTroop, and is currently taking over thousands of machines connected to the internet to be used for a synchronised attack on the target servers. Maharashtra IG (Cyber) Brijesh Singh said, “Mirai had acquired five lakh devices. The Reaper malware has already affected two million devices worldwide, and is acquiring 10,000 devices per day. It seems to be targeting CCTV camera systems and Digital Video Recorders connected to the internet.” Bot attack A Cyber Police officer said, “It’s difficult to say at this point exactly who the targets are, but we have enough information to indicate that machines connected to the internet, including cell phones, laptops, CCTV cameras and other devices, are susceptible. A large number of such machines are being hacked and turned into bots as we speak. Our cyber intelligence network indicates a lot of abnormal behaviour on the internet, consistent with hacking of devices.” A bot, or robot, is an automated programme. In this kind of cyber attack, hackers use malware to infect devices to turn them into bots that do their bidding. Sources said the perpetrators of Reaper are currently creating a huge network of bots, called a botnet in cyberspeak. In October 2016, a malware known as Mirai had executed multiple DDOs attacks on servers of Dyn, a leading domain name service provider, affecting several popular websites including Twitter, Netflix and Reddit. Cyber Police officers said Reaper is amassing bots on a much larger scale than Mirai. “Once the botnet is ready as per the perpetrators’ requirements, they simply have to command the bots to ping servers of the target all at once, resulting in a server crash. Depending on the size of the company or industry targeted, it will result in massive losses of revenue.” A possible way to execute the attack would be that the bots are pre-programmed to strike on a particular day. This possibility is also being probed, officers said. Superintendent of Police Balsing Rajput, Maharashtra Cyber Police, confirmed that intelligence inputs about Reaper have been received. “We are working on the information and will soon be coming out with an advisory regarding the same.” Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/cert-issues-cyber-attack-warning-for-india/article19920037.ece

Read the original post:
CERT issues cyber attack warning for India

DDoS Attack Pulls Down Bitcoin Gold Website

Ever since the initiation of the hard-fork resulting into a new cryptocurrency – Bitcoin Gold (BTG) – from the bitcoin blockchain, the BTG website has been constantly under DDoS attacks and has not resumed operations ever since. Earlier in the day, a new hard fork in the Bitcoin blockchain network gave rise to a new cryptocurrency Bitcoin Gold (BTG) and ever since then the official website has been constantly under DDoS attacks. This new hard-fork which resulted into a derivative cryptocurrency of the popular Bitcoin, has been aimed for establishing a fair platform different from the Bitcoin network which is alleged to have been dominated by large companies. The existing bitcoin mining process requires high-end powerful computing hardware which is quite a lot expensive and certainly not affordable to ordinary miners. As a result the mining process is said to have got centralised into the hands of large companies. With Bitcoin Gold, the miners aim to democratise the mining process by bringing Bitcoin’s inherent value proposition of having a decentralised mode of operation. The first step of the Bitcoin Gold initiation was to take a “snapshot” of the bitcoin blockchain while creating a replica with new set of rules. Moreover, the BTG technical team has decided to release the cryptocurrency absolutely free for all those who are holding bitcoins at the time of fork. Soon after the process was initiated the BTG developer team had started reporting issues pertaining to DDoS attacks on the website. And even hours after the initiation process the attacks seem to have stopped nowhere denying enthusiasts to keep any track of the newly generated BTG cryptocurrency. Adding to the woes, the additional fact is that the new blockchain hasn’t turned public yet and the explorer and tracking tools have not been released yet. Owing to the controversial and divisive nature of cryptocurrency projects such as the Bitcoin Gold, the denial-of-service attacks have been a common phenomenon in occurrence. Jack Liao, LightningAsic CEO, who is said to be the brain behind the BTG’s creation has been quite vocal and critical about the existing mining process of Bitcoins targeting several companies which are profiting from the mining process. His open criticism could possibly be a reason for such attacks. However, in addition to this, there are other reasons attributed to the cause of criticism for Bitcoin Gold. Few developer channels are quite skeptical about BTG using a process in which the BTG will be privately created before being publicly available as an open-source project. Another cause of concern with the Bitcoin Gold is that it has not solved the risk of a “replay attack” which could possibly increase transaction complications when two completely incompatible version of the bitcoin blockchain will be unable to distinguish from each other. At the press time Bitcoin Gold (BTG) is trading at $262, according to the CoinMarketCap Index. The price of Bitcoin (BTC) took a slight hit after the hard fork, losing more than $300 of its all-time max value of $6,000 per-coin. The Bitcoin Gold is still in the development process and we have yet to hear any official from its developer technical team regarding the future plans and its modus operandi. Source: https://www.coinspeaker.com/2017/10/24/ddos-attack-pulls-bitcoin-gold-website/

See the original article here:
DDoS Attack Pulls Down Bitcoin Gold Website

Czech Parliamentary Election Websites Hit by Cyberattacks

The Czech statistical office has reported DDoS (Distrubuted Denial of Service) attacks on websites related to the recent parliamentary elections during the vote count. A number of websites of the Czech statistical office (CZSO) have been subject to cyberattacks during the counting of votes in the Czech parliament’s lower house election, Petra Bacova, the CZSO spokeswoman, told Sputnik Sunday. “The websites related to the parliamentary elections — volby.cz and volbyhned.cz — have temporary failed to function due to DDoS attacks [Distributed Denial of Service] during the vote count on Saturday. These attacks have not affected the overall progress of the election,” Bacova said. The police along with the Czech National Cyber and Information Security Agency have already launched an investigation into the attacks. “Thanks to the rapid response, the attacks on the both aforementioned servers have been neutralized, while the work of the websites has been resumed,” Bacova said. The Czech Republic held an election to the lower house of the parliament on Friday-Saturday. The centrist ANO political party won the election, receiving 29.64 percent of votes. Czech President Milos Zeman stated that he was ready to appoint Andrej Babis, ANO’s leader, as Czech prime minister. Source: https://sputniknews.com/europe/201710231058456317-czech-election-hit-cyberattack/

Follow this link:
Czech Parliamentary Election Websites Hit by Cyberattacks