Tag Archives: denial of service attack

Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Cybercrooks are now offering to launch cyberattacks against telecom services, with prices starting at just $20 a day. Distributed denial of attacks against websites or web services have been going on for many years. Attacks that swamped telecoms services are a much more recent innovation, first starting around 2010. While DDoS attacks on websites are typically launched from botnets (networks of compromised Windows PCs under the control of hackers), attacks on telecom lines are launched using attack scripts on compromised Asterisk (software PBX) server. Default credentials are one of the main security weaknesses used by hackers to initially gain access to a VoIP/PBX systems prior to launching voice mail phishing scams or running SIP-based flooding attacks, say researchers. Telecoms-focused denial of service attacks are motivated by the same sorts of motives as a DDoS on a website. “Typical motives can be anything from revenge, extortion, political/ideological, and distraction from a larger set of financial crimes,” a blog post by Curt Wilson of DDoS mitigation experts Arbor Networks explains. Many of the cybercrime techniques first seen while crooks blitzed websites with junk traffic are being reapplied in the arena of flooding phone lines as a prelude to secondary crimes, according to Arbor. “Just as we’ve seen the Dirt Jumper bot used to create distractions – by launching DDoS attacks upon financial institutions and financial infrastructure at the same time that fraud is taking place (with the Zeus Trojan, or other banking malware or other attack technique) – DDoS aimed at telecommunications is being used to create distractions that allow other crimes to go unnoticed for a longer period.” Arbor details an array of services offered by hackers, some of which offer to flood telephones (both mobile and fixed line) for $20 per day. The more cost-conscious would-be crooks can shop around for a service that offers to blitz lines for $5 an hour, the price offered in another ad spotted by the ASERT security research team. As well as blitzing phone lines, other attacks against a targeted organisation’s VoIP system or SIP controllers are possible. Poorly configured VoIP systems can be brought down even by something as simple as a port scan, Wilson notes. “In such cases, an attacker could bring down an organisations’ phone system quickly if they were able to reach the controller. The benefits of proactive security testing can help identify such brittle systems ahead of time, before an attacker might latch onto the vulnerability. “Any system is subject to availability attacks at any point where an application layer or other processor-intensive operation exists as well as the networks that supply these systems via link saturation and state-table exhaustion. Telecommunications systems are no exception to this principle, as we have seen. Clearly, there is money to be made in the underground economy or these services would not be advertised,” Wilson concludes. For fast protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/02/telecoms_ddos/

Visit link:
Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Indicted College Student Speaks Up About Her Case for involvement of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks

A college student arrested last year for alleged involvement in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks waged by Anonymous appeared publicly here Saturday on a panel discussing the hacktivist collective and online civil liberties. Mercedes Haefer, an undergraduate student at the University of Nevada Las Vegas who was indicted in July 2011 with 13 others for alleged conspiracy to commit DDoS attacks against PayPal’s website, spoke out briefly about her case in the panel session entitled “Anonymous and the Online Fight for Justice.” “I am charged with conspiracy to DDoS,” Haefer said during the panel discussion, noting that she found the charges “amusing.” She would not comment on the specific circumstances that led to her arrest. Anonymous talk at Def Con focused more on online civil liberties and activism, and came amid the backdrop of a screening of “We Are Legion” documentary held at the famed hacker conference. It was a far cry from last year’s Def Con, where some members donned their signature Guy Fawkes masks, while others shouted down speakers during a question-and-answer session on a panel about building a “better” Anonymous. Legal experts on Saturday’s panel pointed to a disparity in sentencing for physical activism versus hacktivism. Marcia Hoffman, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the penalty for online civil disobedience is severe. “I’m not talking spending the night in jail. Federal hacking law [prescribes] up to 10 years in prison: That’s an incredibly harsh penalty,” Hoffman says. “It’s disconcerting that young people flexing their political muscle get 10 years in prison for [a] first-time offense.” Whether DDoS should be considered a legitimate form of protest was also debated. “Under certain circumstances, DDoS is protected political speech and should be afforded First Amendment rights,” said criminal defense attorney Jay Leiderman, who is representing Christopher Doyon, an alleged member of Anonymous who goes by the handle “Commander X.” Leiderman said an interview today that Commander X’s case and the PayPal case are classic examples of how some DDoS attacks should be treated as free speech. In the former, Commander X and others camped out for months in front of the Santa Cruz, Calif., courthouse protesting a crackdown on homeless people sleeping in the streets. “In the wake of more arrests, he and a small number of people allegedly DDoS’ed the County of Santa Cruz, slowing its server for 18 minutes,” he says. “That use of DDoS is a classic form of political speech, where the government is ignoring you and [you] get their attention in a nonharmful and noninvasive way with something to let them know you are out there.” Josh Corman, who has been researching Anonymous and, along with Brian Martin writing a series on “Building A Better Anonymous,” says the DDoS-as-free-speech argument made by the panel was interesting. Corman says he sees the disparity in a $250 fine for physical civil disobedience and a 10-year prison sentence for the digital equivalent. “I can see a reasonable argument that this is a legitimate form of free speech … I can see the disparity in the law there. Maybe they have a case there, but I’ll let people smarter than me decide,” Corman says. “[But] then I realize what a massive distraction that [argument] was.” The free speech DDoS argument distracts from the more malicious activity some members of Anonymous have conducted, he says. “And all of that drowns out the potentially noble” activity, he says. The bottom line is that DDoS doesn’t really accomplish what the hacktivists want it to, anyway, he says. “It doesn’t have any lasting damage at all. It’s a tool of fear” and is noisy, but hasn’t effected the type of change in the targeted organizations that the hacktivists had intended, Corman says. Sony, for example, suffered “orders of magnitude more” in financial losses from the massive earthquake in Japan than from the more than 21 DDoS attacks waged against it, he says. Meanwhile, Haefer offered a little insight into how Anonymous operates: In response to a question about how an Anonymous plan to out Mexican government officials with ties to drug cartels didn’t materialize, she said sometimes the intentions are there, but action may not be “feasible at that time.” “A lot of times where people start up an op with the intention of trying to do something, and someone will jump the gun and say, ‘We’re going to [f’ing] do it,’ and sometimes it’s not always possible with the people we have around and their lives” and other commitments, she said. At A Crossroads Corman says a small group of Anonymous members should define what free speech online means, and a find a better way to protest than DDoS attacks, he says. “I can envision truly noble online activism as transformative as a civil rights movement,” he says. Corman and others at an earlier panel at Def Con urged the security community to be aware and speak out about privacy and freedom concerns at the upcoming World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) meeting. Experts say the meeting could result in the potential restructuring and governance of the Internet that could ultimately hamper user access and freedoms. The security community could be doing more to carry the torch here as a more formal means for Internet activism, he says. “The original Def Con crowd could be a force of organized chaos that keeps the peace actively or passively,” Corman says. And Anonymous, meantime, is at a crossroads, according to Corman. “Several [of them] are ready to engage on what a better Anonymous might look like,” he says. For fast DDoS protection against your website click here to view DOSarrest services. http://www.darkreading.com/database-security/167901020/security/attacks-breaches/240004684/indicted-college-student-speaks-up-about-her-case-anonymous.html

View original post here:
Indicted College Student Speaks Up About Her Case for involvement of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks

Family First site back online after Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Family First’s anti gay marriage website is back up and running after an “unprecedented attack” took out the website’s host servers. “Protect Marriage” was launched by Family First yesterday, but minutes later was removed from the web when it became the immediate target of a “large-scale denial of service attack” according to the site’s webhost. Family First director Bob McCroskrie said the website was dedicated to opposing Labour MP Louisa Wall’s Marriage Equality Bill, which was pulled from the ballot last week and had sparked heated debate from both sides. While the site was reinstated a couple of times yesterday, its Christchurch-based webhost had to eventually pull the site completely because hackers had overwhelmed their servers so much it affected every other website hosted by the company. Family First’s own website was also hosted by the company and has also been pulled. A message is now reading the domain for familyfirst.org.nz has been suspended. Family First has reinstated the site with an international hosting company that had larger servers and tighter security measures. “It is disappointing that some opponents in the marriage debate are unwilling to have robust debate and are resorting to desperate – but failed – attempts to shut us down,” McCroskrie said. “We are also disappointed that our web host company was targeted with offensive emails simply because they were a Christchurch business that we wanted to support and who were willing to host some of our websites.” Meanwhile, US band Train have tweeted they are working on getting their music video “Marry Me” removed from the site, but it still featured on the site’s homepage today. Train caught wind their song was being used by Family First after a Twitter user alerted the band their song was being used on an “anti gay marriage website”. A user named @Mikey_J_S6 tweeted the band last night saying: “Why does your music video appear on a homophobic lobby group’s website?”. Train responded saying “Didn’t know. Getting it off asap. Tnx 4 tip”. McCroskrie said they had not yet heard from Train, but if they were asked to take the song down they would. “We’re not going to go by some post on Twitter, but if the band contact us then we will certainly take it down.” Latest tweets would suggest it is now in the hands of Sony, who were working to get the video off the website. At a Victoria University debate on the issue at the weekend, Wall said she expected a significant amount of vitriol directed her way and had already received nasty emails from those who opposed it. “But you know what, I just send them back some love because that is what this is all about.” Wall, who is the bill’s leader, said the point of it was to put human rights at the forefront of discussion. “It’s not about friction or conflict, it’s about having rational conversations and engagements with people and bringing back at the end of the day to a very personal level.” Both Wall and fellow Labour MP Charles Chauvel, who got married to his partner in Canada where the laws would allow, were expecting “dirty tactics” to arise from minority sectors. “While I’m confident and hopeful about us having the numbers to get this legislation through, there will be bitter opposition to it from a minority, but a vocal and sometimes nasty minority,” Chauvel said. For DDoS protection, contact DOSarrest a result of five years of research, experimentation and mitigation of malicious traffic. In the last four years, we have formed a dedicated team of network security specialists, network engineers and developers focused on mitigating DoS/DDoS attacks. Solving the DDoS problem is like a never ending cat and mouse game with attackers. Click Here to Contact Us! Source: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/7385038/Family-First-site-back-online-after-attack

View original post here:
Family First site back online after Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Super-Charged Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack Spike In 2012

This year has seen distributed denial of service (DDoS) attackers increase the power of DDsS attacks massively, according to figures exclusively shown to TechWeekEurope. DDoS attacks see servers overwhelmed with traffic, causing a target’s website to go down. All kinds of organisations use DDoS attacks, from hacktivists like Anonymous to private companies wanting to stymie competition, and figures have shown they are upping their efforts. The average size of an attack went up 27 percent in 2012, hitting 1.56Gbps in June, compared to 1.23Gbps in 2011, second quarter data from anti-DDoS vendor Arbor Networks showed. June’s average attack speed was 82 percent up on the same month in 2011. There was also a return to growth in super-powered hits, with a 105 percent rise in the proportion of DDoS attacks measuring in at over 10Gbps. Between 2011 and 2010 that proportion was down 34 percent. Multi-vector DDoS attacks Arbor told TechWeekEurope that attackers were increasingly combining big volumetric attacks with stealthy application-level attacks, which are harder to identify due to a lower level of traffic. “We are still seeing a lot of the more stealthy application layer attacks going on out there, although now they are quite often accompanied by a volumetric attack.  Attackers have learned that by generating application and volumetric attacks (multi-vector ) at the same time they can take sites and services down, and keep them down, for longer periods,” said Darren Anstee, solutions architect at Arbor. “Using multiple vectors makes it more difficult for operational security teams to figure out exactly what is going on, as different parts of the attack can impact different areas of infrastructure. Application layer attacks target the application servers, state-exhaustion attacks target firewalls, load balancers etc.” Despite the rise in DDoS power, the highest powered attacks have hit something of a plateau. The biggest monitored attack so far this year came in at 100.84Gbps, lasting 20 minutes, where 2011’s record of 101.394Gbps has not yet been surpassed in 2012. “It does appear that on the Gigabit per second side of things, right at the top end, attacks sizes may have plateaued.  Why?  It could be that 100Gbps of attack traffic  is ‘all’ that is required to take down anything that has been targeted thus far, or, we could have reached some kind of limitation in some of the tools,” Anstee said. For the first time, the port used for Xbox Live connections (port 3074) showed up on Arbor’s findings, taking up 0.76 percent of attacks. Port 80, used by the HTTP protocol, is the prime target for DDoSers, with 29 percent of strikes hitting it in Q2. “There are unfortunately quite a lot of attacks between on-line gamers (this is multiplayer online gaming, rather than gambling).  These attacks are used either to give one player an advantage over another, or avenge a defeat,” Anstee added. Botnets are a major part of the problem, as TechWeekEurope’s recent investigation into the underground DDoS market found. Law enforcement and industry firms continue to work with one another on knocking down botnets, as seen in last week’s effort to kill off super-spammer Grum. But most believe arrests are needed to truly counter the rise of malicious networks. For fast DDoS protection click here . Source: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/ddos-attacks-power2012-86926

Visit link:
Super-Charged Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack Spike In 2012

Five Ways to Protect Against Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attacks

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are able to take out an entire site in a matter of minutes. Firewalls and traditional tools like intrusion detection and prevention systems cannot always mitigate the security risks associated with these threats. New techniques and technologies in DDoS attacks can be more aggressive than their DoS predecessors and require a different kind of approach to network security. This slideshow features some of the tricks and tools, identified by Jim MacLeod, product manager at WildPackets, that can be employed to hinder the flow of a DDoS attack. 1. Understanding a DDoS attack The goal of any DDoS attack is to overwhelm a service to the point where it no longer works. While DDoS has historically been just an annoyance, there is usually a financial impact, such as lost sales or a spike in bandwidth costs. Cloud-hosted services, which charge by usage, are especially financially vulnerable to an onslaught of traffic. DDoS attacks use large numbers of computers simultaneously targeting a single service. The attack often comes from botnets, which are composed of PCs infected by a virus. Recently, DDoS has been used by political protesters, who crowdsource attackers through downloadable software. Older DoS attacks like SYN floods used limited numbers of attackers, so it was possible to use automatic per-client rate-limiting, or to block the IPs. Modern DDoS techniques try to avoid large amounts of traffic per attacker, and rely purely on large numbers. 2. Prepare in advance Many sites may think they’re too small to attract attention. However, DDoS isn’t a hard attack to perform. Ironically, DDoS is even available as a service. If your site is big enough to attract any business, it’s big enough to attract a potential attacker. Reducing the cost of an attack starts with early detection. There are simple techniques you can use to alert yourself to an attack. Run a script on your server that sends a message periodically with the recent traffic count: You’ll get a warning either if the count jumps significantly, or the message doesn’t arrive. Additionally, use a remote monitoring program that periodically checks the service’s availability. A large DDoS attack may block your management access if the site is remote. Try to make sure there’s a cost-effective out-of-band management solution. 3. Identify the attack fingerprint Once you detect a DDoS attack, the first step is to identify its unique characteristics. Despite the availability of cleverer techniques, DDoS usually relies on brute force – which means that the traffic from all of the attackers will have unique similarities. Because large numbers of attackers will be involved, scattered across the Internet, blocking the IP addresses will be nearly impossible. Instead, do a quick packet capture of the attack. Finding examples will be relatively easy, since most of the traffic will be DDoS traffic. Commonalities can often be found in the URI, user agent, or referrer. What you’re looking for is a pattern that you can block with your firewall, router ACL, IDS, etc. It will often be an ASCII or hex pattern at an offset. Become familiar with the capabilities of your equipment, and try some tests in preparation. 4. Block the rogue packets Once you have identified the attack fingerprint, it is time to set up a block within your firewall or router to drop the majority of packets. However, a high-bandwidth attack may simply exhaust your WAN link: You’ll have a clean LAN, but your service will still be unreachable. Contact your carrier now to figure out how to work with them during a DDoS attack, in case they need to do the blocking for you. Some service providers offer “clean pipe” hosting with automatic DDoS squelching. There are also companies who offer products and services to detect and prevent DDoS. Depending on the specifics of your service, it may make financial sense to pay for one of these solutions. Don’t forget the option of simply hosting the service somewhere large enough to absorb the attack – but remember that DDoS against sites that charge by bandwidth can result in unexpectedly high bills. 5. Surviving and cleaning up During and after a DDoS attack, ask for help. Your regional CSIRT (Computer Security Incident Response Team) should be alerted, as they have expertise and contacts that can not only help you during the attack, but also start the process of figuring out who did it and how. A global list is available here: http://www.cert.org/csirts/national/contact.html As cyber crimes get more sophisticated, businesses must be able to constantly adapt to these new security threats. While there are no methods or tools that can completely prevent DDoS attacks from happening, having a security “insurance policy” in place is the first step in ensuring that you are completely prepared. The ability to quickly suspend this new level of attack is tantamount to protecting company data as well as your business as a whole. Click here for DDoS protection. Source: http://www.itbusinessedge.com/slideshows/show.aspx?c=96534

Read More:
Five Ways to Protect Against Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attacks

How To Select A Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Mitigation Service

Late last month, two members of the hacker group LulzSec pleaded guilty to launching distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against entities ranging from the state of Arizona to Nintendo to the CIA. Yet despite extensive media coverage of such attacks, chief information security officers are still surprised when their companies get hit. This is not an unforeseeable lightning bolt from the blue, people. The cyber world is full of anonymous arsonists, and too many businesses are operating without a fire department on call. A few sprinklers won’t cut it when things flare out of control. Firewalls and intrusion-prevention system appliances are no substitute for specialized DDoS backup when an attack escalates. Proactively securing a mitigation service can be a good insurance policy–in fact, it’s better than insurance, which pays off only after damage is done. That’s because mitigation services are designed to prevent destruction from occurring in the first place. Not only can a mitigation service act as a deterrent–many attackers will move on to easier prey when they see an initial DDoS attack fail–but these providers have the capacity and expertise to rapidly scale DDoS countermeasures against coordinated, professional attacks. That can mean keeping your website online even under heavy bombardment. Big And Small Companies At Risk Denial-of-service attacks used to be something that happened to other people, those with high online visibility. Not anymore. “We’ve seen very small companies come to us and they can’t figure out why they’re under attack,” says Chris Richter, VP of security products and services at Savvis. They ask, “‘What have we done?’” Blame the proliferation of prepackaged DDoS toolkits, such as the Low Orbit Ion Cannon and Dirt Jumper, for the fact that no one’s safe. Like any brute-force tactic, DDoS relies on the fact that any attack, even the most rudimentary, repeated with sufficient volume and frequency, can effectively shut down a network or website. Botnets often span thousands or millions of systems worldwide; Akamai, for example, provides a real-time attack heat map. In early July, attack rates were almost 30% above normal, with hot spots in Delaware and Italy. Geographic dispersion, coupled with network traffic crafted to look like legitimate connections from normal users, makes DDoS attacks both extremely effective and difficult to defeat if you’re not an expert with the right tools. There are three main distributed denial-of-service categories: > > Volumetric attacks overwhelm WAN circuits with tens of gigabits per second of meaningless traffic–so-called ICMP or UDP floods. > > Layer 3 attacks abuse TCP. For example, SYN floods overload network equipment by starting but never completing thousands of TCP sessions using forged sender addresses. SYN floods can be in excess of 1 million packets per second, largely in response to the wider deployment of hardware countermeasures on firewalls and other security appliances, says Neal Quinn, COO of DDoS mitigation specialist Prolexic. > > Layer 7 floods use HTTP GET or POST requests to overload application and Web servers. From the attacker’s perspective, L7 exploits aren’t anonymous. The attacking client’s identity (IP address) is exposed because a TCP handshake must be completed. Attackers who use this approach consider the risk outweighed by the technique’s effectiveness at much lower volumes and the traffic’s stealthy nature. Requests are designed to look like normal Web traffic, factors that make L7 attacks hard to detect. Our InformationWeek 2012 Strategic Security Survey shows that the increasing sophistication of threats is the most-cited reason for worry among respondents who say their orgs are more vulnerable now than in 2011, and L7 attacks are certainly sophisticated. They’re also getting more common: Mark Teolis, founder and CEO of DOSarrest , a DDoS mitigation service, says 85% of the attacks his company sees have a Layer 7 component. Attackers leveraging L7 are often developers; they may do some reconnaissance on a website, looking for page requests that aren’t cacheable and are very CPU-intensive–things like filling a shopping cart, searching a database, or posting a complex form. Teolis says that a mere 2 to 3 Mbps increase in specially crafted L7 traffic can be crippling. “We’ve had gaming sites tell us they can handle 30,000 customers, but if 100 hit this one thing, it’ll bring down the entire site,” he says. Layer 7 attacks are tough to defeat not only because the incremental traffic is minimal, but because it mimics normal user behavior. Teolis has seen attacks where an individual bot may hit a site only once or twice an hour–but there are 20,000 bots involved. Conventional network security appliances just can’t handle that kind of scenario. And meanwhile, legitimate customers can’t reach your site. Why Us? The motivations for a DDoS attack are as varied as the perpetrators. For many, it’s just business, with targets strategically chosen by cyber criminals. Others are political–a prime example is LulzSec hitting the Arizona Department of Public Safety to protest the state’s strict immigration law, SB 1070. And for some, it’s just sport. Given this randomness, it’s impossible to predict the need for professional distributed denial-of-service mitigation. For example, Teolis says one of DOSarrest ‘s customers was the Dog Whisperer, that guru of man’s best friend. “If Cesar Millan can get attacked, anyone is fair game,” he says. Purchasing mitigation services requires the same kind of budgeting as any form of IT security: What you spend on controls should be proportional to the value of the data or website. So, while any organization with an online presence is at some risk, those with financial or reputational assets that could be seriously damaged by going dark should take DDoS mitigation most seriously. Everyone should take these preparatory steps. > > Do online reconnaissance: Follow what’s being said about your company online, particularly on public social networks, and look for chatter that might hint at extortion or hacktivism. Subscribe to security threat assessment reports covering the latest DDoS techniques and incidents. Prolexic is one source for threat advisories; US-CERT also has overviews, like this one on Anonymous. > > Heed threat mitigation recommendations: DDoS threat reports typically include details about the attack signature and recommended mitigation steps. For example, a recent Prolexic report on the High Orbit Ion Cannon identifies specific attack signatures, in this case HTTP requests, and content filter rules to block them. For L3/L4 attacks, incorporate these rules into your firewall; do likewise for L7 attacks if your firewall supports application-layer filtering. > > Have a communications strategy: Know what you’ll tell employees, customers, and the media should you be the victim of an attack. Don’t wait to make statements up on the fly. > > Have an emergency mitigation backup plan: Although most DDoS mitigation services operate on a monthly subscription basis, if you haven’t signed up and an attack overwhelms your defenses, at least know who you’re gonna call. Quinn and Teolis say their services can be operational and filtering DDoS traffic within minutes, though of course it will cost you. What To Look For In DDoS Mitigation At the risk of oversimplification, DDoS mitigation services are fundamentally remote network traffic filters. Once your system detects an attack affecting your network or servers, you redirect traffic to the service; the service filters out the junk and passes legitimate packets to their original destinations. In this sense, it’s like a cloud-based spam filter for websites. This traffic redirection, so-called on-ramping, is typically done via DNS. The mitigation provider creates a virtual IP address, the customer makes a DNS A record (hostname) change pointing to the remote VIPA, traffic flows through the mitigation provider’s filters, and the provider forwards only legitimate traffic on to the original site. Those facing attacks on multiple systems can divert entire subnets using Border Gateway Protocol advertisements, using Generic Routing Encapsulation tunneling to direct traffic to the mitigation provider. Advertising a new route to an entire address block protects an entire group of machines and, says Quinn, has the advantage of being asymmetrical, in that the mitigation service is used only for inbound traffic. The most important DDoS mitigation features are breadth of attack coverage, speed of service initiation (traffic on-ramping), and traffic capacity. Given the increasing popularity of application-layer attacks, any service should include both L3/4 and L7 mitigation technology. Services may segment features into proactive, before-the-attack monitoring and reactive, during-the-incident mitigation. Customers with monthly subscriptions should demand typical and maximum mitigation times–measured in minutes, not hours–backed up by a service-level agreement with teeth. Even those procuring emergency mitigation services should expect fairly rapid response. Most DDoS specialists staff operations centers 24/7. With DDoS mitigation, procrastination can be expensive. For those 70% of customers who first turn to DOSarrest in an emergency, the setup fee for the first month is around $3,500 to $4,000, depending on the complexity of the site. In contrast, an average monthly cost on a subscription basis is $700 per public-facing IP address. Filtered bandwidth is another way to differentiate between services. Some, like Prolexic, adopt an all-you-can-eat pricing model. For a flat fee per server, customers can use the service as often as they need with as much bandwidth as required. Others, like DOSarrest , keep the “use as often as you like” model but include only a certain amount of clean bandwidth (10 Mbps in its case) in the base subscription, charging extra for higher-bandwidth tiers. Teolis says 10 Mbps is sufficient for at least 90% of his company’s customers. A few services use a pricing model akin to an attorney’s retainer, with a low monthly subscription but hefty fees for each DDoS incident. Richter says Savvis is moving to this model, saying that customers want usage-based pricing that resembles other cloud services. Prolexic’s Quinn counters that this pricing structure leads to unpredictable bills. Bottom line, there’s a DDoS service to suit your tolerance for risk and budgetary volatility. Optional services available from some providers include postattack analysis and forensics (what happened, from where, and by whom) and access to a managed network reputation database that tracks active botnets and sites linked to fraudulent or criminal activity, a feature that facilitates automated blacklisting to help prevent attacks in the first place. Aside from looking at service features, evaluate each company’s technical expertise and track record. DDoS mitigation specialists, for whom this is a core business (or perhaps their only business) arguably have more experience and focus than Internet service providers or managed security providers for which DDoS mitigation is just a sideline. Not surprisingly, Quinn, whose company was among the first to offer DDoS mitigation as a service, suggests customers should make vendors show evidence that DDoS mitigation is something they do regularly, not as a rare occurrence. Make sure the service has highly qualified staff dedicated to the task. Ask whether the provider has experts available 24/7 and how long it will take to access someone with the technical ability and authority to work on your problem. Unfortunately there’s no rule of thumb for measuring the DDoS mitigation return on investment; it’s really a case-by-case calculation based on the financial value of the site being attacked. It relies on factors such as the cost in lost revenue or organizational reputation for every minute of downtime. Quinn cites a common analyst cost estimate, which Cisco also uses in its product marketing, of $30 million for a 24-hour outage at a large e-commerce site. There’s a cruel asymmetry to DDoS attacks: They can cost thousands to mitigate, inflict millions in damage, and yet attackers can launch them on the cheap. A small botnet can be rented for as little as $600 a month, meaning a serious, sustained attack against multiple targets can be pulled off for $5,000 or $10,000. With damages potentially two or three orders of magnitude higher than the DDoS mitigation costs, many organizations are finding mitigation a worthwhile investment. In fact, three-quarters of DOSarrest ‘s customers don’t wait for a DDoS attack to flip the switch, but permanently filter all of their traffic through the service. That makes sense, particularly if it’s a high-value or high-visibility site, if your traffic fits within the cap, or if you’re using an uncapped service like Prolexic. These services use the same sorts of colocation hosting centers where companies would typically house public-facing websites, and they do geographically distributed load balancing and traffic routing to multiple data centers. That makes the risk of downtime on the provider’s end minimal. And this approach could actually reduce WAN costs since it filters junk before it ever touches your systems. Recommendations If a mitigation service is too expensive, there are things IT can do to lower the exposure and limit the damage from DDoS attacks (discussed more in depth in our full report): 1. Fortify your edge network: Ensure that firewall and IDS systems have DoS features turned on, including things like dropping spoofed or malformed packets, setting SYN, ICMP, and UDP flood drop thresholds, limiting connections per server and client, and dynamically filtering and automatically blocking (at least for a short time) clients sending bad packets. 2. Develop a whitelist of known good external systems: These include business partner gateways, ISP links and cloud providers. This ensures that stringent edge filtering, whether done on your firewall or by a DDoS service, lets good traffic through. 3. Perform regular audits and reviews of your edge devices: Look for anomalies like bandwidth spikes. This works best if the data is centrally collected and analyzed across every device in your network. 4. Understand how to identify DDoS traffic: Research attack signatures and have someone on your network team who knows how to use a packet sniffer to discriminate between legitimate and DDoS traffic. 5. Prepare DNS: Lower the DNS TTL for public-facing Web servers, since these are most likely to be attacked. If you need to protect an entire server subnet, have a plan to readvertise BGP routes to a mitigation service. 6. Keep public Web servers off your enterprise ISP link: With Web servers being the most common DDoS target, Michael Davis, CEO of Savid Technologies and a regular InformationWeek contributor, recommends Web hosting with a vendor that doesn’t share your pipes. “Your website may be down, but at least the rest of your business is up,” says Davis. 7. Practice good server and application security hygiene: Layer 7 attacks exploit operating system and application security flaws, often using buffer overflows to inject attack code into SQL databases or Web servers, so keep systems patched. For DDoS protection please click here . Source: Darkreading

Continued here:
How To Select A Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Mitigation Service

Waring: Hackers can break into your Cisco TelePresence sessions, One of the Methods through Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

If you rely on Cisco TelePresence products for sensive business communications, you might want to stop what you are doing and pay attention to a new warning that hackers can exploit security flaws to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial-of-service condition, or inject malicious commands. Cisco released four separate security advisories today to warn of the risks and urge TelePresence users to deploy patches, especially in sensitive business environments. If you think this might just be a theoretical threat, take a look at what HD Moore (of Metasploit fame) demonstrated for the New York Times earlier this year. The skinny from Cisco: Advisory #1: Cisco TelePresence Recording Server contains the following vulnerabilities: Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Web Interface Command Injection Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to create a denial of service condition, preventing the product from responding to new connection requests and potentially causing some services and processes to crash. Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Web Interface Command Injection may allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges. Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability may allow allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Advisory #2: Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch contains the following vulnerabilities: Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to create a denial of service (DoS) condition, causing the product to become unresponsive to new connection requests and potentially leading to termination services and processes. Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Advisory #3: Cisco TelePresence Manager contains the following vulnerabilities: Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Malformed IP Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to create a denial of service (DoS) condition, causing the product to become unresponsive to new connection requests and potentially leading to termination services and processes. Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Advisory #4: Cisco TelePresence Endpoint devices contain the following vulnerabilities: Cisco TelePresence API Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Exploitation of the API Remote Command Execution vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject commands into API requests.  The injected commands will be executed by the underlying operating system in an elevated context. Exploitation of the Remote Command Execution vulnerability could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject commands into requests made to the Administrative Web interface.  The injected commands will be executed by the underlying operating system in an elevated context. Exploitation of the Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. Summary: Major security holes in the Cisco TelePresence product line could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial-of-service condition, or inject commands. Source: http://www.zdnet.com/hackers-can-break-into-your-cisco-telepresence-sessions-7000000825/

More:
Waring: Hackers can break into your Cisco TelePresence sessions, One of the Methods through Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack on Online websites

As more enterprises push services online, IT executives should be wary of the legal risks which could occur if they are subject to a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, finds Hamish Barwick. It could be an IT executive’s nightmare — finding out the company website has been hit with a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack and can’t be accessed by customers. Both customers and management are demanding to know what’s happening. And worse still, there is evidence that customer data has been compromised. It’s at that time that an IT security contingency plan begins to pay off. For Middletons partner, Mark Feetham — who specialises in ICT law — having a contingency plan in place before the worse happens can help companies avoid loss of business or a potential lawsuit. “Companies that fail to do any planning to address a DDoS threat may be exposed to a negligence claim if an attack is launched against it which causes a third party to suffer a security breach, data or privacy loss,” he says. This IT security contingency plan could include taking proactive steps to ensuring that proper logging is configured in all security devices, so that in the event of an attack, the log data can be examined and handed over to law enforcement agencies. In addition, having a security awareness program developed by the CIO and distributed to all staff members was needed. “Education and awareness of security threats throughout any organisation is key to minimising threats and reducing risk,” Feetham says. He also warns that companies that use Cloud computing services may also be at risk as a DDoS attack could limit or preclude access by the company to its own data or business applications. “Organisations considering Cloud computing as an option must carefully balance the issues against any identified cost saving associated with a switch to Cloud,” Feetham says. “Adequate due diligence on a prospective provider and careful consideration of the terms of the Cloud services contract are strongly recommended.” Gilbert + Tobin’s Andrew Hii says any negligence claim following a DDoS attack will be determined by what the company has done to protect its data. “If the DDoS attack was to stop people from using that website to perform a transaction and those people suffered losses as a result there might be the potential for a negligence claim to be brought against the company,” he says. Regardless of DDoS attacks, Hii adds that companies should make sure that any Cloud provider they go with has in place sufficient security measures. “Insuring that any Cloud provider or outsourcer has best practice standards goes a long way to dealing with those risks,” he says, If the negligence case makes it to court, than having evidence which shows the company’s obligation to its customers is essential, according to Hii. “Record keeping is just as important in any case where a company may be exposed to this kind of liability.” Source: http://www.cio.com.au/article/430050/avoiding_negligence_claims_online/

View original post here:
Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack on Online websites

FBI warning Web Users on July 9th possible Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

When the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) publicly announces a possible catastrophic event, people should better pay attention. There’s big news that a huge number of people around the world might suffer “Internet Blackouts”, meaning, they won’t be able to access the Web at all on their computers starting July 9, 2012. This Denial Of Service (DOS)-type scheme is related to a computer Trojan called DNS Changer Malware. This type of malware performs some illicit activity on the computer system when it is run and can allow somebody from a remote site to take control of another computer. When you’re infected by this DNS Changer, it changes your computer’s Domain Name Server (DNS) to replace your ISP’s provided good DNS servers with rougue DNS servers operated by the DNS Changer author or criminal, in order to divert traffic to fake and illegal sites on the Web and steal your personal informations such as credit card numbers, passwords and usernames, among other things. In November of 2011, in their “Operation Ghost Click”, the FBI successfully shut down the DNS Changer Botnet using a number of their own DNS servers just to maintain the DNS services of millions of unsuspected victims around the world. This would expire on July 9, 2012. The DNS Changer Malware is targeting Windows PCs to other platforms that include the Mac OS and home routers as well. Mobile devices may also be affected. Meanwhile, a technology news blog has written some helpful information on how to check if your computer is affected by this rogue malware and what steps you can do to prevent and get rid of this menacing DNS Changer Malware infection on your computers. The FBI claimed and admitted that they organized a very unusual system to combat this Trojan malware in the private and Internet domain. While this is the first time the U.S. government intervened to such a problem, the FBI said it wouldn’t be the last of it. Source: http://technorati.com/technology/article/fbi-to-web-users-many-could/

More:
FBI warning Web Users on July 9th possible Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ blackmailers busted in cross-border swoop

Cyber hoodlums targeted gold and silver traders Chinese and Hong Kong cops are hailing another success in their cross-border cyber policing efforts with the scalp of a high profile DDoS blackmail gang which targeted gold, silver and securities traders in the former British colony. Six cyber hoodlums were arrested on the mainland in Hunan, Hubei, Shanghai and other locations at the end of June, according to a report in local Hong Kong rag The Standard. Some 16 Hong Kong-based firms including the Chinese Gold & Silver Exchange were targeted in the scheme designed to blackmail them to the tune of 460,000 yuan (£46,200). The gang apparently threatened to cripple their victims’ web operations with distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks if they didn’t cough up. Four of the targeted firms transferred funds totalling 290,000 yuan (£29,150) into designated bank accounts in mainland China, the report said. A source also told The Standard that some of the victims may have been involved in some shady dealings themselves, which made them more reluctant to seek police help. Roy Ko, centre manager of the Hong Kong Computer Emergency Response Team (HKCERT) told The Reg that the arrests are an indication of improving cross-border cyber policing efforts. “Working with counterparts cross border is always a challenge because of different practices, languages, different time zones and so on. Usually, HK and the mainland maintain a good working relationship, just like the HKCERT and CNCERT,” he said. “Because we are in the same time zone, the response is usually quicker than working with the US, for example, where we have to wait until the next day to get a response.” Ko also warned that the attacks show this form of cyber threat is still a popular one for avaricious criminal gangs. “Firms have to assess whether they are a probable target of such an attack – ie whether they rely heavily on the internet to do business – and then prepare countermeasures,” he added. “Subscribing to an anti-DDoS service may be part of the protection strategy in addition to anti-malware, firewall, etc.” Hong Kong businesses have been warned before that they’re fair game to hackers from neighbouring China. Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/04/hong_kong_china_bust_ddos_gang_blackmail/

Excerpt from:
Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ blackmailers busted in cross-border swoop