Tag Archives: dos attacks

Anonymous Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attacks Take Down 3 UK Sites

The hacktivist group Anonymous staged a number of DDoS attacks on UK government websites yesterday in an apparent show of support for the controversial WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who remains stuck inside his Ecuadorean embassy bolt-hole as he attempts to avoid extradition to Sweden. Anonymous, who have been associated with numerous distributed denial of service attacks in the past, yesterday claimed to have taken down a number of high profile government sites in the UK, including the Justice Department website and “Number 10”, the official website of Britain’s prime minister. In addition, it’s believed that the hacktivist collective was also responsible for taking down the UK’s Department of Work and Pensions website on the same day. The group later claimed through its @AnonIRC Twitter that the attacks were part of “#OpFreeAssange, in reference to the WiliLeaks founder that they have long supported. The Ministry of Justice later confirmed the attack in the following statement: “The Ministry of Justice website was the subject of an online attack last night at around 2000 hours. This is a public information website and no sensitive data is held on it. No other Ministry of Justice systems have been affected. Measures put in place to keep the website running mean that some visitors may be unable to access the site intermittently. We will continue to monitor the situation and will take measures accordingly.” As of this morning, it appears that the Department of Work and Pensions site is now running normally, but the Ministry of Justice said that it’s still experiencing some problems with its website, and that it cannot give a time frame for when the problems might be solved. Number10.gov.uk also remains down, with no word from the government as to when it might be back. Source: http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/08/21/opfreeassange-anonymous-ddos-attacks-take-down-3-uk-sites/

Read the original:
Anonymous Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attacks Take Down 3 UK Sites

India hit with Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack from Anonymous

Earlier this year, India had an encounter with “Anonymous”, a diffuse alliance of what are commonly (and incorrectly) called hackers. In its much-publicized “Operation India”, Anonymous blocked public access to, hacked and defaced various websites in protest against the rising censorship of the Internet. This is a legitimate political cause. However, a movement cannot be judged purely by the legitimacy of its goals, and it is important to consider the legitimacy of the means used to achieve these goals. Anonymous used distributed denial of service ( DDoS ) attacks to submerge, albeit temporarily, many websites. The DDoS attack bombards the target website with more user requests than it can bear, until it becomes unavailable to all others. Many compare this to picketing, and use the term “virtual sit-in” for it. The DDoS attack does not breach a website’s security, and is therefore not hacking (more correctly called “cracking”). In contrast, defacement of websites, deletion of data or leaking restricted data, entails hacking, which involves breaching a website’s security and is more analogous to breaking and entering physical premises. Anonymous has done this too in India—defacing some websites and leaking confidential data from others. There are a few crucial differences between picketing as civil disobedience, and the DDoS attack. One is that picketing requires many people to come together and sit in protest. One or two peace protesters cannot successfully block a road. Although there was a time when DDoS attacks also required a large number of people to bombard the target, they can now be achieved by one person with the technological skills to “fire” a large number of computers at the target website.Therefore, a DDoS attack no longer implies that a sizeable section of the public cares enough to be part of a virtual sit-in. The second difference between DDoS attacks and civil disobedience lies in the “hacktivists” unwillingness to be accountable. Martin Luther King and Gandhi made it clear that civil disobedience includes accepting the penalty for breaking the law. Faceless untraceable hackers are far removed from this ethic. While it is true that they risk harsh reprisal if identified, the legitimacy and heroic aura of civil disobedience comes from the willingness to risk that reprisal. It may therefore be difficult to argue that even the DDoS attacks by Anonymous qualify as civil disobedience, which arguably is the most legitimate of the spectrum of options available to a political dissident. If political activists use varied and escalating tactics in the physical world, “hacktivists” use strategies ranging from DDoS to more intrusive defacement, disabling and leaking of data to draw attention to political causes. The legitimacy of these methods—the proportionality and justification of harm caused—can only be determined with reference to particular contexts. One has to evaluate the threat necessitating activism, innocent casualties of the activists’ actions and whether less harmful strategies have already been explored. This is difficult. For instance, the indirect repercussions of a DDoS attack or leaking data may not be apparent at first glance. Anonymous tried setting boundaries to avoid harming innocent citizens during Operation India. It declared that infrastructure websites such as the railway booking portal were not to be attacked, and it prevented disclosure of sensitive financial information when a cinema tickets database was hacked. These precautions, though laudable, are however not quite enough. The influential members of Anonymous cannot successfully identify every action that may cause public harm. For instance, when Anonymous attacked the Supreme Court of India and the Reserve Bank of India websites, it seemed ignorant of the potential impact on litigants and the economy. When it leaked confidential police records, it seemed unaware of the significant hazards of leaking people’s names, addresses and other private data. The precautions taken by Anonymous may vanish next time, since the loosely knit, ever-changing nature of Anonymous community means that power and influence can shift; splinter groups with fewer scruples can emerge. Anonymous cannot achieve the control and accountability possible in a more tangible organized group. This collective operates under disturbingly low levels of transparency and accountability, greatly exacerbated by its ability to veil itself in the shadows of the Internet. New recruits are sometimes endangered by misleading information about the legality and consequences of joining in DDoS attacks. Guerilla warfare is often used without properly exploring more peaceable means, thanks to the power and revenge mob-ethic by which Anonymous is driven. The use of technological arsenal to launch cyber-attacks ignores the likelihood of escalation— “hacktivists” tend to forget that technology is a neutral tool that governments can also use. The government may counter-attack, using its considerable resources to acquire the necessary technological capacity. Citizens may end up being the casualties of the exchange. Phase one of Operation India was riddled with moral ambiguity. If OpIndia participants wish to show the world that they are more than bored nerds playing at a social movement like it is a video game, with all the accompanying air-punching, adrenaline boosting, self-aggrandising thrills, they will ensure that phase two’s constructive and legitimate Right to Information campaign is a roaring success. For instant DDoS services against your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.livemint.com/2012/08/19212459/The-perils-of-8216hactivism.html

View post:
India hit with Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack from Anonymous

Russia Today hit by Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack as anti-Wikileaks group claims responsibility

The website of the Kremlin-funded news network Russia Today has been hit with a denial-of-service attack that some have linked with the station’s support for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, and others with the impending Pussy Riot verdict. The English-language Russia Today (RT) tweeted on Friday morning that its hosting provider had confirmed RT.com was “under DDoS attack”. An anti-Wikileaks group subsequently claimed responsibility, but there is as yet no proof of this connection. It is notable that Friday is the day when a Russian court will decide the fate of three members of the punk protest band Pussy Riot, which has been very critical of Vladimir Putin. RT’s tweet came through at 8:12am. Around 20 minutes later, Antileaks tweeted that it was responsible for the DDoS, and attached a hashtag supporting Pussy Riot. The Wikileaks account then went on to condemn the attack, suggesting that it was connected with RT’s support of Assange, rather than the punk band. Assange, who faces extradition from the UK to Sweden to face questioning over sexual assault allegations, had a chat show on RT, with one of his guests having been Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa. Correa granted Assange diplomatic asylum on Thursday. However, that move has so far had a limited effect, since the UK does not recognise that type of asylum and Assange cannot get safe passage to an airport. RT is a strong supporter of Assange, but it is also a supporter of the Russian leader. Many free-speech advocates are incensed at the likelihood of the Pussy Riot members facing jail time for playing an anti-Putin song in a church. Summary: The Kremlin-funded channel, which featured Julian Assange as a talk-show host, says it has come under denial-of-service attack. Antileaks says it’s responsible, but the timing could more to do with the Pussy Riot verdict than Wikileaks. For fast DDoS protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.zdnet.com/russia-today-hit-by-ddos-as-anti-wikileaks-group-claims-responsibility-7000002794/

Excerpt from:
Russia Today hit by Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack as anti-Wikileaks group claims responsibility

WikiLeaks Back In Business After Being Hit By A Week Of Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

The WikiLeaks website came back online last Tuesday after being down for almost a week due to Distributed Denial of Service Attack (DDoS). The secret-leaking organization says it has been targeted by DDoS making its website inaccessible or sluggish for several days. The attack was said to have began at the beginning of August and has intensified to affect other affiliated sites. A group calling itself “AntiLeaks” claimed responsibility for the attacks following their post on Twitter saying that they were against Julian Assange’s intention to seek political asylum in Ecuador. DDoS attacks work by sending heavy amount of traffic to the servers of a website in the hopes to overload them and to force them to shut down. Such type of attack is the most common form of cyber attacks. According to Wiki Leaks, its servers have been flooded with 10 gigabits per second of fake traffic from thousands of different machines. Experts monitoring the issue noted that the amount of traffic is larger than the usual attacks seen in the past few years. AntiLeaks claim it has no ties to the United States government or any other governments tagged as enemies of WikiLeaks. Many people thinks the DDoS attacks on WikiLeaks was a response to the whistleblower website’s posting of documents showing how TrapWire works. TrapWire is a system being utilized in the US to counter terrorism by collecting and analyzing footages from security cameras and license plate readers around the country. Details about the counterterrorism surveillance system were revealed by Anonymous following an email hacking incident on security intelligence firm Stratfor. WikiLeaks released the documents obtained by Anonymous early this year. Observers believe that it’s a secret digital surveillance effort currently being used around the world. For fast protection for DDoS for your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://thedroidguy.com/2012/08/wikileaks-back-in-business-after-being-hit-by-a-week-of-hacking-attack/

Taken from:
WikiLeaks Back In Business After Being Hit By A Week Of Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Bambuser Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack may be connected with Assange embassy stream

Bambuser came under a distributed denial-of-service attack on Thursday morning, possibly in connection with a user’s coverage of the Ecuadorian embassy where Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is holed up. The connection is not certain, but Bambuser’s Swedish proprietors say they had received threatening tweets just prior to the attack. Bambuser chief Jonas Vig told ZDNet that the DDoS took the service down for “almost an hour” and made it “hard to reach for another hour”. Bambuser lets people stream live video from their smartphones to the web. It has become very popular with activists and protestors, from the Occupy movement to Russia and Syria. The service has come under attack before, with the attacks generally coinciding with marches and protests that are being covered on Bambuser. The stream that appears to have solicited the DDoS is that of ‘citizen journalist’ James Albury, who has stationed himself outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Julian Assange has been inside the embassy since June, and the Ecuadorian government is set to announce its decision regarding his asylum bid later on Thursday. A diplomatic row erupted overnight, after Ecuador accused UK authorities of preparing to storm the embassy. Assange is wanted for questioning in Sweden over sexual coercion and rape allegations, and the UK wants to extradite him there under a European Arrest Warrant. Vig explained that the tweets Bambuser had received were not of the ‘tango down’ variety, but they did indicate that “it was someone aiming the attack directly at some specific users of ours”. “We still don’t want to speculate who was behind it, but there’s some indication it was directly aimed at blocking the streams from the embassy,” he added. “It was quite a serious attack,” Vig said. “We consider all DDoSes as serious.” A new anti-Wikileaks hacker, or group of hackers, called Antileaks has suggested on Twitter that he, she or they might be responsible for the DDoS. For fast DDoS protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source:

View the original here:
Bambuser Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack may be connected with Assange embassy stream

What Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attack Are and How to Survive Them

Never heard of a DDoS attack? Small companies that do business online ought to learn about this growing online threat — and figure out how they’ll respond should one ever hit them. Consider what happened to Los Angeles-based business-planning publishing and advisory company Growthink. Last September, a surprise flood of bogus traffic knocked its website off the internet for several days. Growthink turned to its hosting firm for help, only to have its website sidelined so other sites wouldn’t be collateral damage. It finally recovered by hiring a DDoS-protection firm, BlockDos, to filter out the bad traffic. Then it moved to a new hosting service, Rackspace, so it would be better prepared next time. “It was pretty intense,” says Kevin McGinn, Growthink’s IT director. “We had no idea why we were being singled out.” Growthink had suffered a “distributed denial-of-service” attack. In a DDoS attack, legitimate site visitors are denied access by hackers who immobilize the site either with a flood of bogus internet traffic or a surgical strike that exhausts the resources of a specific web application. Successful attacks can cripple business operations. Growthink estimates its website outage erased $50,000 in revenue. As Growthink discovered, it isn’t always clear who’s out to get you. Experts say e-commerce outfits and other businesses that rely heavily on the web for their livelihoods are most at risk. Smaller companies are most often attacked by unscrupulous competitors and extortionists, although disgruntled former employees, vandals and “hacktivists,” or hackers with a political agenda, are also known culprits. With both the number and ferocity of attacks rising, DDoS incidents are a growing threat. In the last year, CloudFlare, a San Francisco cloud-based web performance and security firm, said it has seen a 700 percent rise in DDoS traffic. Small companies are increasingly finding themselves in the crosshairs, experts say, as the cost of mounting attacks drops and large companies get better at stopping them. Attackers can rent “botnets” of 1,000 hijacked malware-infected home PCs capable of taking down sites of most small-to-medium-sized businesses for only $400 a week, according to Incapsula, a competitor to CloudFlare that’s a subsidiary of security firm Imperva, both of Redwood Shores, Calif. Even modest extortionists can profit. Australian e-commerce company Endless Wardrobe received an email in May demanding $3,500 via Western Union. When the firm didn’t comply, its site was knocked offline for a week by a torrent of bogus visits. The downtime cut revenue by at least the amount of the demanded ransom. Here are tips on how to survive if you find your business under a DDoS attack, too. Find a hosting service or ISP that will help. Many hosting services put large numbers of small websites on the same servers to boost efficiency. That’s fine until one site is attacked and the hosting company takes it offline so other customers on the server aren’t hurt as well. Check your contracts and speak with your hosting service or internet service provider, or ISP, to find out what it will do if you come under attack. Will it help you stop the attack and recover, and if so, at what cost? Will it send you a giant bill because an attack generated a ton of extra traffic to your site? A growing number of these service providers are offering security features, including DDoS protection, as a way to differentiate themselves in a crowded market. Such companies, which often employ technology from specialists such as Arbor Networks, include Firehost, Rackspace and iWeb. Hire Help. Companies that provide website acceleration services also often help fend off DDoS attacks. For instance, CloudFlare provides a free basic level of DDoS protection that it says will stop most attacks, and two tiers of service at $20 and $200 a month that can stop larger attacks. Incapsula includes DDoS protection as part of its Enterprise tier of service for an undisclosed fee. If you’re targeted with a highly sophisticated attack, however, you may want to consider hiring a DDoS-protection specialist, such as DOSarrest , a cloud-based security company based in Canada. Investigate ways to fortify your site. CloudFlare co-founder and CEO Matthew Prince suggests using nginx web server software — favored by the likes of Netflix and WordPress — because it can be more resistant to DDoS than other programs. He also recommends using the latest versions of your web software, such as WordPress and shopping carts, to prevent some application-based attacks. For fast protection DDoS protection for your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/224099?cam=Dev&ctp=Carousel&cdt=13&cdn=224099

Continued here:
What Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Attack Are and How to Survive Them

Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Cybercrooks are now offering to launch cyberattacks against telecom services, with prices starting at just $20 a day. Distributed denial of attacks against websites or web services have been going on for many years. Attacks that swamped telecoms services are a much more recent innovation, first starting around 2010. While DDoS attacks on websites are typically launched from botnets (networks of compromised Windows PCs under the control of hackers), attacks on telecom lines are launched using attack scripts on compromised Asterisk (software PBX) server. Default credentials are one of the main security weaknesses used by hackers to initially gain access to a VoIP/PBX systems prior to launching voice mail phishing scams or running SIP-based flooding attacks, say researchers. Telecoms-focused denial of service attacks are motivated by the same sorts of motives as a DDoS on a website. “Typical motives can be anything from revenge, extortion, political/ideological, and distraction from a larger set of financial crimes,” a blog post by Curt Wilson of DDoS mitigation experts Arbor Networks explains. Many of the cybercrime techniques first seen while crooks blitzed websites with junk traffic are being reapplied in the arena of flooding phone lines as a prelude to secondary crimes, according to Arbor. “Just as we’ve seen the Dirt Jumper bot used to create distractions – by launching DDoS attacks upon financial institutions and financial infrastructure at the same time that fraud is taking place (with the Zeus Trojan, or other banking malware or other attack technique) – DDoS aimed at telecommunications is being used to create distractions that allow other crimes to go unnoticed for a longer period.” Arbor details an array of services offered by hackers, some of which offer to flood telephones (both mobile and fixed line) for $20 per day. The more cost-conscious would-be crooks can shop around for a service that offers to blitz lines for $5 an hour, the price offered in another ad spotted by the ASERT security research team. As well as blitzing phone lines, other attacks against a targeted organisation’s VoIP system or SIP controllers are possible. Poorly configured VoIP systems can be brought down even by something as simple as a port scan, Wilson notes. “In such cases, an attacker could bring down an organisations’ phone system quickly if they were able to reach the controller. The benefits of proactive security testing can help identify such brittle systems ahead of time, before an attacker might latch onto the vulnerability. “Any system is subject to availability attacks at any point where an application layer or other processor-intensive operation exists as well as the networks that supply these systems via link saturation and state-table exhaustion. Telecommunications systems are no exception to this principle, as we have seen. Clearly, there is money to be made in the underground economy or these services would not be advertised,” Wilson concludes. For fast protection against your e-commerce website click here . Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/02/telecoms_ddos/

Visit link:
Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ crooks: Do you want us to blitz those phone lines too TDoS?

Tablet’s Server Outages due to Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

For the last several months, Tablet Magazine’s servers have been coming under recurring distributed denial-of-service attacks, or DDoS attacks . Yesterday we suffered two major attacks, the first around 1:30 p.m., shortly after we posted Michael C. Moynihan’s explosive article about the further dishonesty of Jonah Lehrer, the author and New Yorker writer. The Lehrer story brought us an unprecedentedly large legitimate traffic load. Some commentators and observers speculated that that’s what brought us down. It’s true that the rush of readers coming to the Lehrer story was much larger than normal, but I am assured by our IT team that we had more than sufficient bandwith and server memory to handle it. Notably, for several midafternoon hours, when we were not under attack, we served extraordinarily high traffic loads uneventfully. Our IT team strongly believes that what we were experiencing—and have been for some time—are sophisticated attacks specifically targeting Tablet, not just run-of-the-mill Internet-as-Wild-West hijinks. It is possible that whoever is out to get us seized on a moment when we had high publicity and high server demand to attack. It sounds a little paranoid, granted, but as the saying goes, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you. The romantic in me hopes it’s the Iranians. Meantime, we’re doing what we can to keep the site up, and we apologize for our no-doubt maddening unreliability. And if you’re a DDoS-mitigation expert who’s eager for some pro-bono work, you know where to find us. Source: http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/107948/on-tablet%E2%80%99s-server-outages

Follow this link:
Tablet’s Server Outages due to Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack

Super-Charged Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack Spike In 2012

This year has seen distributed denial of service (DDoS) attackers increase the power of DDsS attacks massively, according to figures exclusively shown to TechWeekEurope. DDoS attacks see servers overwhelmed with traffic, causing a target’s website to go down. All kinds of organisations use DDoS attacks, from hacktivists like Anonymous to private companies wanting to stymie competition, and figures have shown they are upping their efforts. The average size of an attack went up 27 percent in 2012, hitting 1.56Gbps in June, compared to 1.23Gbps in 2011, second quarter data from anti-DDoS vendor Arbor Networks showed. June’s average attack speed was 82 percent up on the same month in 2011. There was also a return to growth in super-powered hits, with a 105 percent rise in the proportion of DDoS attacks measuring in at over 10Gbps. Between 2011 and 2010 that proportion was down 34 percent. Multi-vector DDoS attacks Arbor told TechWeekEurope that attackers were increasingly combining big volumetric attacks with stealthy application-level attacks, which are harder to identify due to a lower level of traffic. “We are still seeing a lot of the more stealthy application layer attacks going on out there, although now they are quite often accompanied by a volumetric attack.  Attackers have learned that by generating application and volumetric attacks (multi-vector ) at the same time they can take sites and services down, and keep them down, for longer periods,” said Darren Anstee, solutions architect at Arbor. “Using multiple vectors makes it more difficult for operational security teams to figure out exactly what is going on, as different parts of the attack can impact different areas of infrastructure. Application layer attacks target the application servers, state-exhaustion attacks target firewalls, load balancers etc.” Despite the rise in DDoS power, the highest powered attacks have hit something of a plateau. The biggest monitored attack so far this year came in at 100.84Gbps, lasting 20 minutes, where 2011’s record of 101.394Gbps has not yet been surpassed in 2012. “It does appear that on the Gigabit per second side of things, right at the top end, attacks sizes may have plateaued.  Why?  It could be that 100Gbps of attack traffic  is ‘all’ that is required to take down anything that has been targeted thus far, or, we could have reached some kind of limitation in some of the tools,” Anstee said. For the first time, the port used for Xbox Live connections (port 3074) showed up on Arbor’s findings, taking up 0.76 percent of attacks. Port 80, used by the HTTP protocol, is the prime target for DDoSers, with 29 percent of strikes hitting it in Q2. “There are unfortunately quite a lot of attacks between on-line gamers (this is multiplayer online gaming, rather than gambling).  These attacks are used either to give one player an advantage over another, or avenge a defeat,” Anstee added. Botnets are a major part of the problem, as TechWeekEurope’s recent investigation into the underground DDoS market found. Law enforcement and industry firms continue to work with one another on knocking down botnets, as seen in last week’s effort to kill off super-spammer Grum. But most believe arrests are needed to truly counter the rise of malicious networks. For fast DDoS protection click here . Source: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/ddos-attacks-power2012-86926

Visit link:
Super-Charged Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ attack Spike In 2012

How To Select A Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Mitigation Service

Late last month, two members of the hacker group LulzSec pleaded guilty to launching distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against entities ranging from the state of Arizona to Nintendo to the CIA. Yet despite extensive media coverage of such attacks, chief information security officers are still surprised when their companies get hit. This is not an unforeseeable lightning bolt from the blue, people. The cyber world is full of anonymous arsonists, and too many businesses are operating without a fire department on call. A few sprinklers won’t cut it when things flare out of control. Firewalls and intrusion-prevention system appliances are no substitute for specialized DDoS backup when an attack escalates. Proactively securing a mitigation service can be a good insurance policy–in fact, it’s better than insurance, which pays off only after damage is done. That’s because mitigation services are designed to prevent destruction from occurring in the first place. Not only can a mitigation service act as a deterrent–many attackers will move on to easier prey when they see an initial DDoS attack fail–but these providers have the capacity and expertise to rapidly scale DDoS countermeasures against coordinated, professional attacks. That can mean keeping your website online even under heavy bombardment. Big And Small Companies At Risk Denial-of-service attacks used to be something that happened to other people, those with high online visibility. Not anymore. “We’ve seen very small companies come to us and they can’t figure out why they’re under attack,” says Chris Richter, VP of security products and services at Savvis. They ask, “‘What have we done?’” Blame the proliferation of prepackaged DDoS toolkits, such as the Low Orbit Ion Cannon and Dirt Jumper, for the fact that no one’s safe. Like any brute-force tactic, DDoS relies on the fact that any attack, even the most rudimentary, repeated with sufficient volume and frequency, can effectively shut down a network or website. Botnets often span thousands or millions of systems worldwide; Akamai, for example, provides a real-time attack heat map. In early July, attack rates were almost 30% above normal, with hot spots in Delaware and Italy. Geographic dispersion, coupled with network traffic crafted to look like legitimate connections from normal users, makes DDoS attacks both extremely effective and difficult to defeat if you’re not an expert with the right tools. There are three main distributed denial-of-service categories: > > Volumetric attacks overwhelm WAN circuits with tens of gigabits per second of meaningless traffic–so-called ICMP or UDP floods. > > Layer 3 attacks abuse TCP. For example, SYN floods overload network equipment by starting but never completing thousands of TCP sessions using forged sender addresses. SYN floods can be in excess of 1 million packets per second, largely in response to the wider deployment of hardware countermeasures on firewalls and other security appliances, says Neal Quinn, COO of DDoS mitigation specialist Prolexic. > > Layer 7 floods use HTTP GET or POST requests to overload application and Web servers. From the attacker’s perspective, L7 exploits aren’t anonymous. The attacking client’s identity (IP address) is exposed because a TCP handshake must be completed. Attackers who use this approach consider the risk outweighed by the technique’s effectiveness at much lower volumes and the traffic’s stealthy nature. Requests are designed to look like normal Web traffic, factors that make L7 attacks hard to detect. Our InformationWeek 2012 Strategic Security Survey shows that the increasing sophistication of threats is the most-cited reason for worry among respondents who say their orgs are more vulnerable now than in 2011, and L7 attacks are certainly sophisticated. They’re also getting more common: Mark Teolis, founder and CEO of DOSarrest , a DDoS mitigation service, says 85% of the attacks his company sees have a Layer 7 component. Attackers leveraging L7 are often developers; they may do some reconnaissance on a website, looking for page requests that aren’t cacheable and are very CPU-intensive–things like filling a shopping cart, searching a database, or posting a complex form. Teolis says that a mere 2 to 3 Mbps increase in specially crafted L7 traffic can be crippling. “We’ve had gaming sites tell us they can handle 30,000 customers, but if 100 hit this one thing, it’ll bring down the entire site,” he says. Layer 7 attacks are tough to defeat not only because the incremental traffic is minimal, but because it mimics normal user behavior. Teolis has seen attacks where an individual bot may hit a site only once or twice an hour–but there are 20,000 bots involved. Conventional network security appliances just can’t handle that kind of scenario. And meanwhile, legitimate customers can’t reach your site. Why Us? The motivations for a DDoS attack are as varied as the perpetrators. For many, it’s just business, with targets strategically chosen by cyber criminals. Others are political–a prime example is LulzSec hitting the Arizona Department of Public Safety to protest the state’s strict immigration law, SB 1070. And for some, it’s just sport. Given this randomness, it’s impossible to predict the need for professional distributed denial-of-service mitigation. For example, Teolis says one of DOSarrest ‘s customers was the Dog Whisperer, that guru of man’s best friend. “If Cesar Millan can get attacked, anyone is fair game,” he says. Purchasing mitigation services requires the same kind of budgeting as any form of IT security: What you spend on controls should be proportional to the value of the data or website. So, while any organization with an online presence is at some risk, those with financial or reputational assets that could be seriously damaged by going dark should take DDoS mitigation most seriously. Everyone should take these preparatory steps. > > Do online reconnaissance: Follow what’s being said about your company online, particularly on public social networks, and look for chatter that might hint at extortion or hacktivism. Subscribe to security threat assessment reports covering the latest DDoS techniques and incidents. Prolexic is one source for threat advisories; US-CERT also has overviews, like this one on Anonymous. > > Heed threat mitigation recommendations: DDoS threat reports typically include details about the attack signature and recommended mitigation steps. For example, a recent Prolexic report on the High Orbit Ion Cannon identifies specific attack signatures, in this case HTTP requests, and content filter rules to block them. For L3/L4 attacks, incorporate these rules into your firewall; do likewise for L7 attacks if your firewall supports application-layer filtering. > > Have a communications strategy: Know what you’ll tell employees, customers, and the media should you be the victim of an attack. Don’t wait to make statements up on the fly. > > Have an emergency mitigation backup plan: Although most DDoS mitigation services operate on a monthly subscription basis, if you haven’t signed up and an attack overwhelms your defenses, at least know who you’re gonna call. Quinn and Teolis say their services can be operational and filtering DDoS traffic within minutes, though of course it will cost you. What To Look For In DDoS Mitigation At the risk of oversimplification, DDoS mitigation services are fundamentally remote network traffic filters. Once your system detects an attack affecting your network or servers, you redirect traffic to the service; the service filters out the junk and passes legitimate packets to their original destinations. In this sense, it’s like a cloud-based spam filter for websites. This traffic redirection, so-called on-ramping, is typically done via DNS. The mitigation provider creates a virtual IP address, the customer makes a DNS A record (hostname) change pointing to the remote VIPA, traffic flows through the mitigation provider’s filters, and the provider forwards only legitimate traffic on to the original site. Those facing attacks on multiple systems can divert entire subnets using Border Gateway Protocol advertisements, using Generic Routing Encapsulation tunneling to direct traffic to the mitigation provider. Advertising a new route to an entire address block protects an entire group of machines and, says Quinn, has the advantage of being asymmetrical, in that the mitigation service is used only for inbound traffic. The most important DDoS mitigation features are breadth of attack coverage, speed of service initiation (traffic on-ramping), and traffic capacity. Given the increasing popularity of application-layer attacks, any service should include both L3/4 and L7 mitigation technology. Services may segment features into proactive, before-the-attack monitoring and reactive, during-the-incident mitigation. Customers with monthly subscriptions should demand typical and maximum mitigation times–measured in minutes, not hours–backed up by a service-level agreement with teeth. Even those procuring emergency mitigation services should expect fairly rapid response. Most DDoS specialists staff operations centers 24/7. With DDoS mitigation, procrastination can be expensive. For those 70% of customers who first turn to DOSarrest in an emergency, the setup fee for the first month is around $3,500 to $4,000, depending on the complexity of the site. In contrast, an average monthly cost on a subscription basis is $700 per public-facing IP address. Filtered bandwidth is another way to differentiate between services. Some, like Prolexic, adopt an all-you-can-eat pricing model. For a flat fee per server, customers can use the service as often as they need with as much bandwidth as required. Others, like DOSarrest , keep the “use as often as you like” model but include only a certain amount of clean bandwidth (10 Mbps in its case) in the base subscription, charging extra for higher-bandwidth tiers. Teolis says 10 Mbps is sufficient for at least 90% of his company’s customers. A few services use a pricing model akin to an attorney’s retainer, with a low monthly subscription but hefty fees for each DDoS incident. Richter says Savvis is moving to this model, saying that customers want usage-based pricing that resembles other cloud services. Prolexic’s Quinn counters that this pricing structure leads to unpredictable bills. Bottom line, there’s a DDoS service to suit your tolerance for risk and budgetary volatility. Optional services available from some providers include postattack analysis and forensics (what happened, from where, and by whom) and access to a managed network reputation database that tracks active botnets and sites linked to fraudulent or criminal activity, a feature that facilitates automated blacklisting to help prevent attacks in the first place. Aside from looking at service features, evaluate each company’s technical expertise and track record. DDoS mitigation specialists, for whom this is a core business (or perhaps their only business) arguably have more experience and focus than Internet service providers or managed security providers for which DDoS mitigation is just a sideline. Not surprisingly, Quinn, whose company was among the first to offer DDoS mitigation as a service, suggests customers should make vendors show evidence that DDoS mitigation is something they do regularly, not as a rare occurrence. Make sure the service has highly qualified staff dedicated to the task. Ask whether the provider has experts available 24/7 and how long it will take to access someone with the technical ability and authority to work on your problem. Unfortunately there’s no rule of thumb for measuring the DDoS mitigation return on investment; it’s really a case-by-case calculation based on the financial value of the site being attacked. It relies on factors such as the cost in lost revenue or organizational reputation for every minute of downtime. Quinn cites a common analyst cost estimate, which Cisco also uses in its product marketing, of $30 million for a 24-hour outage at a large e-commerce site. There’s a cruel asymmetry to DDoS attacks: They can cost thousands to mitigate, inflict millions in damage, and yet attackers can launch them on the cheap. A small botnet can be rented for as little as $600 a month, meaning a serious, sustained attack against multiple targets can be pulled off for $5,000 or $10,000. With damages potentially two or three orders of magnitude higher than the DDoS mitigation costs, many organizations are finding mitigation a worthwhile investment. In fact, three-quarters of DOSarrest ‘s customers don’t wait for a DDoS attack to flip the switch, but permanently filter all of their traffic through the service. That makes sense, particularly if it’s a high-value or high-visibility site, if your traffic fits within the cap, or if you’re using an uncapped service like Prolexic. These services use the same sorts of colocation hosting centers where companies would typically house public-facing websites, and they do geographically distributed load balancing and traffic routing to multiple data centers. That makes the risk of downtime on the provider’s end minimal. And this approach could actually reduce WAN costs since it filters junk before it ever touches your systems. Recommendations If a mitigation service is too expensive, there are things IT can do to lower the exposure and limit the damage from DDoS attacks (discussed more in depth in our full report): 1. Fortify your edge network: Ensure that firewall and IDS systems have DoS features turned on, including things like dropping spoofed or malformed packets, setting SYN, ICMP, and UDP flood drop thresholds, limiting connections per server and client, and dynamically filtering and automatically blocking (at least for a short time) clients sending bad packets. 2. Develop a whitelist of known good external systems: These include business partner gateways, ISP links and cloud providers. This ensures that stringent edge filtering, whether done on your firewall or by a DDoS service, lets good traffic through. 3. Perform regular audits and reviews of your edge devices: Look for anomalies like bandwidth spikes. This works best if the data is centrally collected and analyzed across every device in your network. 4. Understand how to identify DDoS traffic: Research attack signatures and have someone on your network team who knows how to use a packet sniffer to discriminate between legitimate and DDoS traffic. 5. Prepare DNS: Lower the DNS TTL for public-facing Web servers, since these are most likely to be attacked. If you need to protect an entire server subnet, have a plan to readvertise BGP routes to a mitigation service. 6. Keep public Web servers off your enterprise ISP link: With Web servers being the most common DDoS target, Michael Davis, CEO of Savid Technologies and a regular InformationWeek contributor, recommends Web hosting with a vendor that doesn’t share your pipes. “Your website may be down, but at least the rest of your business is up,” says Davis. 7. Practice good server and application security hygiene: Layer 7 attacks exploit operating system and application security flaws, often using buffer overflows to inject attack code into SQL databases or Web servers, so keep systems patched. For DDoS protection please click here . Source: Darkreading

Continued here:
How To Select A Distributed Denial of Service ‘DDoS’ Mitigation Service