Tag Archives: latest

Possibly related DDoS attacks cause DNS hosting outages

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks that could be related have in the past few days slammed the DNS servers of at least three providers of domain name management and DNS hosting services. DNSimple, easyDNS and TPP Wholesale all reported temporary DNS service outages and degradation on Monday, citing DDoS attacks as the reason. In some cases the attacks started a few days ago and are ongoing. TPP Wholesale, a subsidiary of Sydney-based Netregistry, one of Australia’s largest providers of Web hosting, domain management and other online services, alerted its customers through its website on Monday that eight of its DNS servers experienced “unscheduled service interruption.” TPP Wholesale experienced a series of DDoS attacks against its DNS name servers over the past several days, the Netregistry Group Security Team said in a blog post. The company managed to mitigate the DDoS attacks that caused service interruptions throughout Monday by taking “the drastic step” of rate-limiting DNS queries, the team said. Such aggressive filtering is prone to false positives and might result in some customers being denied DNS service. “In the next few days we will continue to whitelist such false positives as we discover them,” the team said. Second wave EasyDNS, a DNS hosting provider based in Toronto, also reported DNS service disruptions caused by a DDoS attack on Monday. “This looks like a larger version of a smaller DDoS yesterday which was possibly a test run,” the company’s CEO Mark Jeftovic said Monday in a blog post. “This DDoS attack is different from our previous ones in that it looks as if the target is us, easyDNS, not one of our clients.” Jeftovic said that it was difficult to differentiate the real traffic from the DDoS traffic, but the company managed to partially mitigate the attack and also published workarounds for affected customers. “This is the ‘nightmare scenario’ for DNS providers, because it is not against a specific domain which we can isolate and mitigate, but it’s against easyDNS itself and it is fairly well constructed,” he said. Third victim Aetrion, based in Malabar, Florida, operates a DNS hosting service called DNSimple, which was also attacked on Monday. According to DNSimple founder Anthony Eden, the DDoS attack is ongoing, but the company managed to mitigate it. “Our authoritative name servers were used as an amplifier for an attack against a third-party network,” Eden said Tuesday via email. “The attacker essentially flooded us with ‘ANY’ queries for a variety of domains managed by our DNS service, with the intention of amplifying these small queries into significantly larger responses aimed at a specific network.” This attack technique is known as DNS reflection or DNS amplification. It involves sending queries with a spoofed source IP (Internet Protocol) address—usually the victim’s address—to DNS servers from a large number of computers in order to trigger long responses to be sent by those servers to victim’s IP address within a short time window. If enough computers and DNS servers are used, the resulting rogue DNS traffic will exhaust the victim’s available Internet bandwidth. The DNS reflection technique has been known for a long time. However, its recent use to launch DDoS attacks of unprecedented scale, like the one in March that targeted a spam-fighting organization called Spamhaus, has likely brought it renewed interest from attackers. The attack experienced by DNSimple on Monday was significantly larger in volume and duration than other attacks that hit the company’s name servers in the past, Eden said. He believes that the attack is related to the ones experienced by easyDNS and TPP Wholesale. “The pattern displayed on TPP Wholesale’s blog is similar to what we see, and we have been communicating with easyDNS and find similarities between the attacks.” EasyDNS and TPP Wholesale did not immediately respond to inquiries seeking more information about the recent attacks against their servers and confirmation that they were using DNS reflection techniques. Attack and abuse reports on the increase It’s possible that DNS servers operated by other companies were also affected by this attack, Eden said. “A DNS provider will have a significantly higher number of customers and thus the attacks get noticed much sooner because it affects a larger group of people,” he said. DNSimple’s authoritative name servers were used to amplify a DDoS attack directed at a server hosting company called Sharktech or one of its customers, Eden said. Sharktech has noticed a surge of abuse reports in the past 24 hours coming from ISPs and hosting companies complaining about DDoS attacks against their DNS servers that appear to originate from Sharktech, said Tim Timrawi, president and CEO of Sharktech, via email. Upon further investigation the company determined that these reports were actually the result of a DNS amplification attack against its own customers that abused the authoritative DNS servers of those companies, he said. Most of the affected DNS servers were secured properly and were being queried for domains they are responsible for, Timrawi said. “Unlike previous DNS Amplification Attacks in which the attacker used open recursive DNS servers, in this one, the attacker is collecting all the DNS servers they can find and sending MX (and other kind of queries) to them for their domain records with a spoofed source of the target host,” he said. The amplified DDoS attack targeting Sharktech customers was larger than 40Gbps, Timrawi said. “We are unaware of the reason behind the attacks,” he said. The abuse of authoritative name servers in DNS reflection attacks is not very common because attackers need to know the exact domain names that each abused server is responsible for, said Carlos Morales, vice president of sales engineering and operations at DDoS mitigation provider Arbor Networks. Obtaining this information is not very hard, but it does require additional work compared to abusing open DNS resolvers, and attackers usually prefer the easiest route to reach their goals, he said. Open DNS resolvers are recursive DNS servers that are configured to accept queries from any computers on the Internet. These act as relays between users and authoritative DNS servers; they receive queries for any domain name, find the authoritative name server responsible for it and relay the information obtained from that server back to the user. Meanwhile, authoritative name servers, like those operated by DNSimple, easyDNS and TPP Wholesale, will only respond to queries concerning the domain names they serve. Well-prepared attackers The extra work required to target such servers suggests that the attackers behind the recent attacks on these DNS hosting providers were well prepared and did their homework in advance, Morales said. One mitigation against this kind of attack is to configure the DNS server software to force all “ANY” queries sent over UDP (User Datagram Protocol) to be resent over TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) instead, Eden said. This can be done by sending a UDP response with the TC bit set and an empty answer section. A legitimate DNS client will retry over TCP, while a bogus client will get no benefit, he said. In the case of open resolvers, the problem can be mitigated by restricting which IP addresses are allowed to query them, said Morales. For example, an ISP operating a DNS resolver for its customers can restrict its use to only IP addresses from its network, he said. However, this kind of mitigation is not applicable to authoritative name servers because they are meant to be queried by anyone on the Internet who wants to get information about the specific domain names served by them, Morales said. The mitigation described by Eden is very good and is actually one that Arbor also uses to protect authoritative name servers, he said. Another mitigation is to enforce a query rate limit for source IP addresses, he said. Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2040766/possibly-related-ddos-attacks-cause-dns-hosting-outages.html

View original post here:
Possibly related DDoS attacks cause DNS hosting outages

Turkish gov’t websites hacked by Anonymous

A group of computer hackers known as Anonymous carried out early on Monday a series of cyberattacks on Turkish government websites in retaliation for violent police response to anti-government protests. Several Anonymous messages in its Twitter blog provide links to the sites, including those of President Turkish President Abdullah Gul and Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party, that have been denied public access. Hackers normally use distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks to knock their targets offline. Turkey’s Hürriyet Daily News reported on Monday that some Turkish media websites have also been targeted by Anonymous for “for failing to adequately cover the events.” The planned demolition of Gezi Park in central Istanbul sparked mass rallies in the city on Saturday, prompting police to use tear gas and water cannons to disperse the protesters. Violent clashes between protesters and police continued in Istanbul and the capital, Ankara, on Sunday. The rally in Istanbul triggered more than 230 separate protests in 67 cities across the country, according to Sky News. Turkey’s Interior Minister Muammer Guler said on Sunday that more than 1,700 people had been arrested in the unrest nationwide, adding that 58 civilians and 115 security officers had been injured over several days of protests. The United States and the European Union and have already urged the Turkish government to exercise restraint, while Amnesty International has condemned the use of tear gas by Turkish police as “a breach of international human rights standards.” Anonymous declares Internet attacks in support of Turkish protests Anonymous vows to kick off a worldwide action which will “bring the Turkish government to its knees.” With #opTurkey, the hacktivist collective plans to “attack every Internet and communications asset of the Turkish government.” Anonymous claims to have taken down several websites across Turkey, targeting municipal governments in Mersin and Izmir as well the Gebze Institute of Technology. Source: http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/151067/turkish-gov-39-t-websites-hacked-by-anonymous.html

Continued here:
Turkish gov’t websites hacked by Anonymous

Threat of the Week: DDoS For Hire on the Rise

Just when you thought you could tune out the fears about DDoS (distributed denial of service) attacks, listen up: the risks for you suddenly are much graver, and it may be the time when defensive action on your part has become necessary. Yes, the fear-mongering over the May 7th DDoS blitzkrieg – which turned out to be a non-event – has prompted many credit union executives to turn off the DDoS discussion. That’s a mistake, however. “Three years ago I would have called DDoS a nuisance. Now it is a threat to many more businesses,” said Vann Abernethy, an executive with security firm NSFOCUS. A big change that is occurring, sources insist to Credit Union Times , is that for-rent DDoS networks – often costing spare change – are proliferating and they have plenty of firepower to take down most credit unions’ online presences. The scariest part: absolutely no technical skills are required to deploy what is being called DDoS as a service. All that’s needed is digital money – PayPal or BitCoin and there even are some providers that take MasterCard and Visa. Barry Shteiman, senior security strategist at Imperva, named names of sites that he said offer what seems to be DDoS for hire: SSH Booter, Empire Stresser, Quantum Stresser, Asylum Stresser, Titanium Stresser, Illuminati Stresser, Legion Stresser, Agony Stresser. The list is not complete. “There are dozens of companies selling DDoS as a service now,” said Sean Bodmer, chief researcher, Counter-Exploitation Intelligence, for CounterTack. Note: Almost all such sites claim to offer, not rogue DDoS for hire, but “stress testing” so that an organization – a credit union for instance – can check its DDoS defenses. Just one problem: sources insisted that the majority of stress-testing sites they are familiar with do no verification that the person buying the “stress test” has any affiliation whatsoever with the target. What’s fueled the rise in DDoS as a service? For one, the intense publicity for DDoS has just about everybody aware of the attack format. For two, “As email spam has become more and more a solved problem it has forced criminals with botnets to find other uses for them. DDoS lets them monetize their botnets,” said Matthew Prince, CEO of CloudFlare, a DDoS mitigation company. DDoS as a service prices are also tumbling. Hemant Jain, vice president of engineering for security company Fortinet, said that he has found providers who are selling an hour of DDoS for $5, a 24-hour day of it for $40 and a week for $260. Can’t these DDoS as service provider be shut down by law enforcement? It’s not that easy. Commented Carl Herberger, vice president of security solutions at mitigation provider Radware, “It’s important to note that ‘DDos for Hire’ websites move around in terms of their technical underpinning. They don’t stay in one area or one location for too long. It’s almost like a game of “Whack-a-Mole” – just when you think you’ve identified the location of the website, it’s already moved.” Added Chris Ensey, COO of security company Dunbar Digital Army, “These (DDoS as a service) sites are being resold like white-labeled products now. Most of the sellers are just affiliates who leverage another botnet or platform” – that is, they have none of their own infrastructure and, poof, they can be here today and back tomorrow under a new flag. That’s the problem: it is very hard to pinpoint the location of a DDoS command and control center and when it’s found, said sources, it generally is in a country with little or no law enforcement reciprocity with the United States. The bottom line for credit unions: “They have to take DDoS seriously. There is no turning this back,” said Shteiman. The good news: the attack throughputs via DDoS for hire are tiny fractions of what al Qassam is throwing at money center banks – 1% or 2% of the volume in many cases. But that is plenty to knock out a credit union that lacks defenses. As for what defenses are needed to thwart for hire DDoS, experts indicated that in most cases low-cost mitigation, within the budget of just about every credit union, ought to suffice. Talk with mitigation companies, also ask Web hosts what protections they have on hand or can line up, Small expenditures ought to bring peace of mind – at least that’s what the experts are saying today Source: http://www.cutimes.com/2013/05/28/threat-of-the-week-ddos-for-hire-on-the-rise?ref=hp

View the original here:
Threat of the Week: DDoS For Hire on the Rise

Iranian Hackers Launching Cyber-Attacks on U.S. Energy Firms: Report

Iranian hackers launched attacks as part of a campaign against the country’s oil and gas industry, according to current and former U.S. government officials. Iranian hackers have amped up a campaign of cyber-attacks against America’s energy industry, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal . Citing current and former U.S. officials speaking under the blanket of anonymity, the Journal reported that Iranian hackers accessed control system software that could have allowed them to manipulate oil or gas pipelines. The attacks raise the stakes in cyber-space between the U.S. and Iran, which has been accused by U.S. officials of being behind a spate of distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS) against U.S. banks stretching back to 2012. “This is representative of stepped-up cyber activity by the Iranian regime. The more they do this, the more our concerns grow,” a source told the Journal . “What they have done so far has certainly been noticed, and they should be cautious.” Alireza Miryousefi, Iran’s spokesperson at the United Nations, denied any connection between hackers and the regime in an interview with the Journal . The officials who spoke to The Wall Street Journal did not name any of the energy companies targeted in the attacks. But two former officials said oil and gas companies located along the Canadian border were among those hit. Word of the attacks comes a week after Charles Edwards, deputy inspector general at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, told members of a Senate subcommittee that industrial control systems were increasingly coming under attack in cyber-space in ways that could potentially cause “large-scale power outages or man-made environmental disasters.” Securing these systems is complicated, as many are more interconnected with the Internet than people realize, explained Tom Cross, director of security research at network security vendor Lancope. “It is also difficult to fix security flaws with these systems because they aren’t designed to be patched and restarted frequently,” he said. “It is extremely important,” he continued, “that operators of industrial control networks monitor those networks with systems that can identify anomalous activity that might be associated with an attack. Because of the relatively homogenous nature of network activity on many control systems networks, anomaly detection can be can be a powerful tool in an environment where other kinds of security approaches fall flat.” Much of the talk about improving the security of critical infrastructure companies has focused on information sharing between the government and private sector. Improving communication between government and business figured prominently in the executive order on cyber-security that President Barack Obama issued in February. However, many officials and security experts have said that the order does not undo the need for legislation. “The increases in cyber-assaults on our energy systems from Iranian-backed hackers are another signal to the government and the industry that measures must be taken to fortify the security of our critical infrastructure,” said Lila Kee, chief product and marketing officer at GlobalSign and a North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) board member. “However, there is a fine line between cyber-security regulation and voluntary standards,” she said. “Regulations cannot be so rigid so as to prevent protection from today’s evolving advanced persistent threats, and voluntary standards cannot be so loose so as to provide no purpose. In today’s modern world of malware, solutions must be fluid and scalable to battle aggressive cyber-attacks.” Source: http://www.eweek.com/security/iranian-hackers-launching-cyber-attacks-on-us-energy-firms-report/

Read More:
Iranian Hackers Launching Cyber-Attacks on U.S. Energy Firms: Report

DDoS Attacks – Understanding the Dangers

If you’re a small business owner, or if you own Web space for any reason, one of the new threats that have no doubt begun to appear on your horizon is the potential of being attacked online. Fortunately for the hackers, not a lot of people understand what online attacks really are, how they pull them off, or how to effectively protect from it. Most computer repair experts agree it is hard to guarantee 100 percent security, but you can take the necessary precautions to minimize damages if your security is ever compromised. Taking precautions starts by understanding the dangers: One of the most common types of attack that takes place these days is a DDOS, or Distributed Denial of Service attack. This type of attack is particularly effective because it doesn’t require an intimate knowledge of your security to be deployed. It just takes brute force. Prior to the scheduled attack, the hacker will create a swarm of “zombie” computers — computers infected by the hacker’s software. This software allows the hacker to use the processing power of thousands of computers belonging to other people to bring down your server. When the attack commences, the hacker tells the zombie computers to simultaneously and continually load information from your Web server. If the attack is powerful enough, your server will stop serving. It will become unreachable so even legitimate visitors can’t access the site. While this intense strain is taking over your server, the hacker can try to slip into the back door unnoticed. This is where a lot of the actual financial loss associated with DDOS attacks come from. Scared yet? Don’t be…too scared. Most DDOS attacks happen to high-profile sites that make a lot of money online and that have a lot to lose from even a temporary outage. But there’s still a chance it could happen to you for reasons beyond your control. So how do you protect against such a large-scale attack? The easiest way is to talk to your in-house IT Department and have them work through the nine steps that help defend against a DDOS attack. No IT onsite?  Then call your trusted IT or computer repair professionals and tell them you want to prepare for a DDOS attack. They can best help you and recommend plans to upgrade your servers or to install special software that can determine  legitimate traffic from DDOS attacks. They might also want to talk with you about the current security software you’re using. An off-the-shelf program probably won’t defend very well against this new type of attack, so talk with your IT professional about the options available to you. As always, the best defense is vigilance. As you’re managing your website, be sure to note any suspicious traffic, educate your staff on safe practices and call your computer repair professionals as soon as you note suspicious activity. Most likely it won’t be anything, but it never hurts to ask. For protection against your eCommerce site click here . Source: http://www.sitepronews.com/2013/05/22/ddos-attacks-understanding-the-dangers/

Read more here:
DDoS Attacks – Understanding the Dangers

Saudi Web Sites Under DDoS Attack

The Saudi Interior Ministry said Friday that several government Web sites have come under attack in a campaign hackers are calling #OpSaudi. Hackers who identify with the loose hacking collective Anonymous have aimed at several government Web sites, including the Saudi Ministry of Finance, General Intelligence Presidency, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Directorate General of Passports, as well as sites for several major Saudi provinces, including Makkah and Jeddah. Most of the sites are facing distributed denial of service, or DDoS, attacks, in which hackers flood each site with traffic until they collapse under the load. But hackers claimed to have also broken into some sites through a so-called SQL injection, in which attackers exploit a software vulnerability and enter commands that cause a database to produce its contents. In one case, the Twitter account for @AnonySaudi claimed to delete the database of a Saudi Web server. Hackers say their motive is twofold. On Twitter, some claim the #OpSaudi campaign is in retaliation for unconfirmed reports of a rape and murder in Saudi Arabia. Some Tweets include links to YouTube videos which show images of a naked body dumped on the side of a road. The attacks also followed an announcement by Matthew Rosenfield, the well-known security researcher who goes by the hacker handle Moxie Marlinspike, that Mobily, a major Saudi telecommunications company, approached him about assisting in a continuing Saudi surveillance project. In a widely circulated blog post Monday, Mr. Marlinspike said he learned that on behalf of a Saudi “regulator,” Mobily is working to intercept mobile app data for communication tools including Twitter and free mobile messaging apps like Viber, Line and WhatsApp that send messages over the Web. He published his e-mail correspondence with an executive at Mobily, which showed the company is developing the ability to monitor mobile data communication and already has the ability to block it. Mr. Marlinspike told Yasser D. Alruhaily, a Mobily security executive, that he declined the job for privacy reasons. Mr. Alruhaily replied, “I know that already and I have same thoughts like you freedom and respecting privacy, actually Saudi has a big terrorist problem and they are misusing these services for spreading terrorism and contacting and spreading their cause that’s why I took this and I seek your help,” he wrote. “If you are not interested than maybe you are on indirectly helping those who curb the freedom with their brutal activities.” Mobily spokesman denied contacting Mr. Marlinspike. ”Mobily or its employees never communicated with the author of this blog,” the company told Reuters. “Mobily communicates with information security companies only based on legal and lawful requirements. We never communicate with hackers. Moreover, it is not our job to spy on customers.” On Friday, the Mobily Web site was among the growing number of Saudi Web sites that #OpSaudi had taken offline. Source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/saudi-web-sites-under-attack-following-surveillance-accusations/

More:
Saudi Web Sites Under DDoS Attack

LulzSec Hackers Get Years Of Prison Time

Four men who took part in a significant number of cyber attacks on the likes of the NHS, Sony and the CIA received stern sentences today, following a lengthy trial into the activities of hacktivist crew LulzSec. News International and the UK Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) were also hit by the hackers, who thought they were “latter-day pirates”, according to prosecutors speaking yesterday. Tough sentences for LulzSec Ryan Cleary, who was affiliated with LulzSec but not believed to be a leader, received the toughest sentence, with 32 months in prison. He let LulzSec members use his botnet to carry out distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. Cleary is also due to be sentenced over indecent images of children found on his computer at a later date. Ryan Ackroyd received a 30-month sentence for his part in researching and executing many attacks. Jake Davis, the spokesperson of LulzSec, is to serve 24 months in young offenders’ institution, whilst Mustafa Al-Bassamwas, who researched vulnerabilities for the attacks, was handed a 20-month suspended sentence of two years and 300 hours unpaid work. It is believed US law enforcement are keen to have some of the men extradited to face charges on US soil. However, Cleary’s legal team issued the following statement: “We believe the pleas that were entered today do cover all aspects of Mr Cleary’s criminality and therefore we do not anticipate that he will be in receipt of an application for extradition from the United States of America.” The notice, from Karen Todner Solicitors, also noted Cleary suffered from Aspergers Syndrome, but added he “does not seek to excuse his behaviour”. No laughing matter Charlie McMurdie, head of the Police Central e-Crime Unit, which carried out the investigation into the hackers alongside the FBI, said LulzSec had been “running riot, causing significant harm to businesses and people”. “Theirs was an unusual campaign in that it was more about promoting their own criminal behaviour than any form of personal financial profit,” added McMurdie, who is soon to retire from the force. “In essence, they were the worst sort of vandal – acting without care of cost or harm to those they affected, whether that was to cause a company to fold and so costing people their jobs, or to put at threat the thousands of innocent Internet users whose logins and passwords they made public. “They claimed to be doing it for ‘a laugh’ but real people were affected by their actions. Today’s convictions should serve as a deterrent to others who use the Internet to commit cyber attacks.” This might not be the denouement to the LulzSec saga, however, as hackers are threatening to take revenge. According to Sophos’ Graham Cluley, before the sentences were announced today, a group using the Twitter handle @LulzSecWiki said courts “could be in for ‘fun’” depending on their decision. Source: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/lulzsec-hackers-jailed-uk-116507

Taken from:
LulzSec Hackers Get Years Of Prison Time

Paypal turns blind eye to payments totaling $35,000 for on-demand DDoS

It seems as though just about anyone with Internet access can set up a profitable online enterprise these days — including a criminal one. And for one Illinois teen, YouTube and PayPal have been all too happy to help him make a fast (albeit illegal) buck. Brian Krebs has been sleuthing once again, and his target this time was a “stress testing” service called Asylum Stresser . Stress testing, of course, is the thin veil that skiddies (script kiddies) like to drape over a for-hire DDoS attack setup. According to Krebs and his cohorts, Asylum looks like it’s been built using fairly run-of-the-mill cybercrime kitware that’s promoted in underground forum sites. Its servers are based in Romania, and appear to be nestled safely in a data center that is nothing if not criminal-friendly. Nothing shocking so far, right? Anyone who has a few extra bucks (or BitCoins) to white label someone else’s criminal back-end can do this stuff. But here’s the twist: the kid Krebs believes is running Asylum Stesser is accepting PayPal payments and advertising on YouTube. Recently, Asylum’s user database was leaked to the web and it revealed that more than $35,000 had been sent to one chandlerdowns1995(at)gmail.com. Downs also appears to have hired an eager infomercial actor over on Fiverr. While the promo spot is good for a chuckle, it’s hard to believe that YouTube will jump all over a 30 second fan-made video for copyright infringement, but has somehow allowed an ad for an illegal DDoS service to be viewed more than 42,000 times. Downs maintains that it’s not his fault if people use the service to launch illegal attacks. Asylum Stresser was launched so that law-abiding folk can make sure their websites are resilient. Maybe that’s why PayPal and YouTube have been fine with ignoring what’s gone on to this point. Former U.S. Justice Department attorney Mark Rasch, however, feels differently. He told Krebs that if Downs triggers an attack after being paid to do so, he is “criminally and civilly liable.” Downs didn’t exactly made it difficult for Krebs to connect the dots here. Let’s see if PayPal and YouTube get their heads out of the sand now and do something before an Illinois court orders them to. For protection against your eCommerce site click here . Source: http://www.geek.com/news/paypal-turns-blind-eye-to-payments-totaling-35000-for-on-demand-ddos-1554902/

See the original post:
Paypal turns blind eye to payments totaling $35,000 for on-demand DDoS

9 PH gov’t sites inaccessible due to DDoS Attack

Two days before the May 13 elections, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) and the Philippine News Agency websites appeared inaccessible to the public. Cursory inspections of the websites of the Philippines’ Departments of Interior and Local Government, National Defense, Foreign Affairs, and Science and Technology, showed they were also apparently inaccessible. The pages for the Philippine National Police, the Army and Navy, and the Philippine Information Agency also could not be accessed. As of 4:10 pm., the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) acknowledged and confirmed distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks occurring against government sites, but they did not mention where the attacks came from. In a text message to Rappler, Roy Espiritu of the DOST ICT Office said the attacks started on May 10 on gov.ph, then to additional gov.ph-based websites on May 11. He added that the DOST was working on neutralizing the attacks and determining the source. They are also assisting government agencies outside their secured servers who have asked for help. Interaksyon.com earlier reported on the possibility of the downtime being caused by a cyberattack, but noted that the Facebook page of Anonymous Philippines, a hacker-activist group, stated they would undertake no operations during this time. GMA wrote that its technical team “detected an overnight cyberattack that was still ongoing as of posting time on numerous Philippine websites, including GMA News Online, ABS-CBN News, Philippine Airlines, Globe, Smart, and more than two dozen Philippine government websites.” Based on referrer tags and forum activity, GMA also added the attacks seem to have come from Taiwan, linking to a Taiwanese webpage that seems to have reacted positively to the Philippine site downtime. The possibility of a cyberattack related to Philippine-Taiwanese tensions resulting from the shooting of a Taiwanese fisherman was also raised. While no announcement has been made by the Philippine government, Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez mentioned previously to Rappler that the Comelec website may have downtime due to the number of people visiting it, as well as the location of the Comelec website servers. It also repeated this in a recent tweet. As of 2:30 pm., Rappler could access the site, which appears to have had a redesign in time for the elections. With regard to election issues, those seeking information from the Comelec about finding one’s voting precinct but cannot access their homepage can contact the Comelec through the following hotlines: 525335; 5259297; 5259301; 5259302; 5259345; 5271892; 5516552; 5521451; 5523044. – Rappler.com For protection against your eCommerce site click here . Source: http://www.rappler.com/nation/28804-philippine-government-sites-inaccessible

View original post here:
9 PH gov’t sites inaccessible due to DDoS Attack

Nationwide DDoS Attack Hits ReputationChanger.com

ReputationChanger.com was the most recent target in a string of high-profile cyber-attacks against U.S. web companies and governmental organizations. Reputation.com, LivingSocial and Name.com have all announced recently that they have been the targets of successful attacks by hackers. Tens of millions of consumers have been asked to change passwords in the wake of these attacks with large numbers of the population informed that personal data may have been accessed. A hack of the Associated Press account in Twitter resulted in a temporary loss on U.S. stock markets of $200 billion in late April. The U.S. Defense Department accused Chinese government-backed hackers this week of a sustained cyber campaign which successfully targeted governmental and defense contractor websites. The Chinese later denied these allegations. ReputationChanger.com was indeed targeted by an attack from a Chinese IP address that lasted most of the day. While the company’s public website was taken down for roughly half an hour in a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS), an investigation confirms that the company’s critical information — including client data — remained untouched. “The attack brought down our main website briefly but I think overall it revealed the strength and security of our operation in a way that we are truly proud of,” comments the company’s president, Michael Zammuto. “Because of the system set up, no client data was in danger of being accessed or compromised — and indeed, no client data was accessed or compromised. No action is required of any client although periodic password changes are always recommended.” Even a cyber-attack targeting the company’s Command Center, the firm’s online reputation management platform, could not have led to illicit data access. “The confidentiality of what we do is critical, and we are endlessly devoted to maintaining the complete privacy of our clients,” Zammuto offers. “As such, we have a highly distributed cloud system, response teams and processes in place to prepare for cyber threats.” Though the identity of the cyber assailant is yet unknown, Zammuto says the impetus for the attack is likely the high-profile client list that ReputationChanger.com maintains. “We were surely targeted because of the very important clients that we work with,” he affirms. ReputationChanger.com’s clientele encompasses governments, political figures, educational institutions, celebrities, and major, internationally-recognized businesses and brands. Despite the brief downtime experienced on the ReputationChanger.com website, Zammuto says that he is ultimately thrilled with how well the enterprise held up in the face of a malicious online assault. “I am very pleased with the performance of our network security team and partners,” he remarks. “It is a great reminder of how valuable investments are in these areas. They kept us safe from a vicious online enemy. It is because of their hard work and their expertise that ReputationChanger.com’s clients can rest assured that their confidential data is in the best possible hands.” ReputationChanger.com is the top rated online reputation management firm according to Top SEOs and was announced as a finalist for the Red Herring 100 earlier this week Both organizations citing the firm’s technology and its commitment to serving its clients. For protection against your eCommerce site click here . Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130509-912785.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Visit link:
Nationwide DDoS Attack Hits ReputationChanger.com