Tag Archives: marketing

UCAS under DDoS attack

Ucas has been the victim of a hacking attempt, when its website was the target of a denial of service attack. The site was unavailable late on 14 August, the day before thousands of A-level students were due to receive their results across the country. A spokesperson for Ucas said: “The UCAS website suffered a sustained, criminal ‘denial of service’ attack. The site was down for an hour and then restored fully. No personal information was compromised. Confirmation and Clearing went ahead as normal. The attack originated in the Asia Pacific region and the police have been informed.” The chief executive of Ucas, Mary Curnock Cook, speaking to the Huffington Post, said staff were ‘pretty upset’ at the attempt. “The incident was contained very, very quickly and no personal data was released to anybody.” As of yesterday evening, over one million students had logged into Track. Ucas placed nearly double the number of students through clearing this year, in comparison with numbers from last year. 7,970 students had found a place through clearing, compared with 4,180 last year. The attempt to wreck the system was stopped, thanks to new technology that Ucas have installed in their software. Cumock Cook said: “This year we have made a step-change in our technology arrangements and most of our critical services are deployed in the cloud, which gives us massive resilience.” Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/ucas-hacked-ahead-of-alevel-results-8770993.html

Link:
UCAS under DDoS attack

Police nab alleged DDoS extortion gang at Heathrow Airport

Two Polish men were arrested at Heathrow Airport earlier this week in connection with an alleged DDoS extortion attack on a Manchester-based business, news sources have reported. Details are light but it is known that a website connected to the business was brought down during the attack, which happened at an unspecified time before the 7 August arrests. “This investigation centres on an allegation that the on-line company was blackmailed,” said Detective Inspector Chris Mossop, of Greater Manchester Police’s Serious Crime Division “As part of this blackmail attempt, one of the company’s websites was made temporarily unavailable by the offenders,” he added. “Denial of service attacks have become increasingly common offences in recent years and can have a devastating effect on the victim’s on-line business or presence.” The investigation continued in several countries, including the UK, the US and Poland, police said. Although such cases rarely come to light, cyber-extortion has flourished in the last decade. In almost every case, DDoS is the weapon of choice. These days, small and medium-size businesses are the usual target because they are far less likely to have DDoS mitigation in place to defend themselves. The other less common technique involves attackers stealing data and threatening to release it unless a ransom is paid. An example of this type of attack came to light last year when a Belgian bank was blackmailed by hackers. Last December, hackers tried to extort $4,000 AUS (£2,600) from a medical centre in Australia after breaching its network and encrypting its customer database. A recent survey suggested that one in five UK businesses had been affected by DDoS attacks during 2012. Source: http://news.techworld.com/security/3463285/police-nab-alleged-ddos-extortion-gang-at-heathrow-airport/

Read the article:
Police nab alleged DDoS extortion gang at Heathrow Airport

Analysis: Who’s Really Behind DDoS?

Now that Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters has launched its fourth phase of distributed-denial-of-service attacks against U.S. banks, many observers are continuing to ask: Who’s behind this group, and what are the real motives? Is al-Qassam really an independent hacktivist group, as it claims? Does it have connections to a nation-state, such as Iran? Or does it have ties to organized crime? And is there a possibility that it has leased out its botnet to multiple groups? In this analysis, Information Security Media Group weighs the evidence. al-Qassam has been waging DDoS attacks against leading U.S. banking institutions and a handful of smaller ones since last September. The attacks, designed to disrupt online banking service, have, so far, proven to be more of a nuisance than a malicious threat. But the launch of this new phase, which was announced July 23, raises new questions about just who is behind Izz ad-Din al-Qassam The Group’s Message Since the beginning, al-Qassam has positioned itself as a group of hacktivists – independent attackers who are waging online war against U.S. banking institutions to make a social statement. The group claims the catalyst for the attacks is a movie trailer on YouTube that it deems offensive to Muslims. And because YouTube has not removed links to this trailer, as al-Qassam has asked, al-Qassam is focusing its attack energies on America’s core – it’s financial foundation. In an Oct. 23 post on the open forum Pastebin, al-Qassam restated its purpose, and noted that the attacks are not being waged to perpetrate fraud . “We have already stressed that the attacks launch only to prevent banking services temporarily throughout the day and there is no stealing or handling of money in our agenda,” the group states. “So if others have done such actions, we don’t assume any responsibility for it. Every day we are giving a compulsive break to all employees of one of the banks and its customers.” The post also takes issue with statements made in October by U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who during a speech about cybersecurity noted that industries touching critical infrastructure were at risk. “Mr. Panetta has noted in his remarks to the potential cyberthreats such as attacking on power and water infrastructures, running off trains from the tracks and etc.,” the post states. “In our opinion, Panetta’s remarks are for distracting the public opinion and in support of the owners of the banks’ capital. … This is capitalism’s usual trick.” Then, in November, an alleged member of al-Qassam told ABC News that its attacks were not backed by anyone, nor were they connected to the August 2012 attack on Aramco, a Saudi oil firm, which involved the deletion of data from tens of thousands of computers. “No government or organization is supporting us, and we do not wait for any support as well,” the self-proclaimed al-Qassam member wrote in an e-mail, ABC News reported. “Do you think that the massive protests in the world are done with support? [In] the same manner [that] millions of Muslims in the world protested, hackers are also part of this protest” But many experts have questioned the protest motive and have expressed doubt that al-Qassam is what it says it is. Experts’ Views Financial fraud analyst Avivah Litan has repeatedly argued these attacks are actually being backed by a nation-state, namely Iran, not independent hacktivists. Others, such as Bill Wansley of the consultancy Booz Allen Hamilton, have shared similar opinions. “There are indications that it’s an Iranian group,” Wansley told BankInfoSecurity in late September 2012. “There are a lot of indicators it’s from that region of the world. But these hacktivist groups, frankly, can operate from a number of different locations and give the impression of being from one time zone when they’re really not. So it’s not conclusive. But there certainly have been some indicators, such as the use of Arabic names, Iranian names and the time zone [and the time of day when the first attacks struck] that would indicate something from that part of the world.” An unnamed source within the U.S. government quoted in the New York Times in May suggested Iran is backing attacks against the U.S. in retaliation for economic sanctions the U.S. has imposed on Iran. Many security experts, however, have been reluctant to attribute these attacks to any one type of actor. That’s because any attribution could only be based on circumstantial evidence in the online world, says Alan Brill, cybercrime investigator and senior managing director at investigations and risk-consulting firm Kroll. “You can’t accept crowd opinion for verified fact,” he says. “I think it’s still very difficult to attribute things like this, simply because the Internet was never designed to make that easy.” Although Brill admits he has not carefully reviewed the evidence linked to these attacks, he says attributing these types of attacks is challenged by attackers’ abilities to mask their points of origination with throw-away IP addresses and anonymous networks. “Unlike other forms of evidence, such as a fingerprint at a crime scene, which does not change, this stuff is just so fluid,” he says. “It’s very difficult to put all of the pieces together. And in the case of state actors, you’re not going to get a lot beyond circumstantial evidence.” Reviewing Patterns But what can the industry glean from the most recent attacks? Many experts say the more they learn about al-Qassam, the more confused they are. The group’s Pastebin announcements, attack schedules and breaks between attack campaigns have been inconsistent. Just as soon as the industry thinks it’s outlined a pattern, the pattern changes, as shown again in this fourth wave of attacks. Here, Information Security Media Group spells out some important factors. Are They Really Hacktivists? Support for the notion that al-Qassam is a hacktivist group stems from the fact that it claims itself to be one – and so far, no financial fraud or other type of data compromise has been linked to an al-Qassam attack. Banking regulators have warned of the potential for DDoS to be used as a mode of distraction for fraud to be perpetrated in the background But so far, no account compromises have been associated with al-Qassam attacks. The group claims it’s waging its attacks for social reasons – outrage over a YouTube video deemed offensive to Muslims. That purpose would suggest this is just a group of hacktivists out for attention. Is a Nation-State Involved? But none of the industry experts interviewed for this analysis believes that is truly the motive. Hacktivists typically want attention. “There’s usually some bragging about what was accomplished,” Wansley said last year. “That’s the typical pattern of some of the hacktivist groups.” While al-Qassam bragged on Pastebin in the early weeks of its attacks, the bragging has waned over time. Hacktivists also often name their targets in advance. Al-Qassam did this early on, but as the attacks became less effective, that stopped. During the second and third campaigns, al-Qassam took credit after the attacks. Now, most of that post-attack bragging has stopped as well. And experts note that these DDoS strikes have been hitting U.S. banking institutions for nearly a year; a hacktivist group would need substantial funding to run an attack campaign that long. That’s why many believe al-Qassam is actually a front for a nation-state, a criminal network – or even a mix of both. “In this case, there’s a group that has an Arabic name that has never been associated with cyber-activity at all,” Wansley noted. “[The name has] been associated with Hamas. And for them to, all of the sudden, become a hacktivist group is just really interesting. We’ve never seen that before. That doesn’t mean they’re not doing it, but it could also mean they’re being used as a cover for some other country or organization to do something.” The timing of this fourth phase further supports the notion that al-Qassam is actually a nation-state actor, Gartner’s Litan contends. The Iranian presidential election, as well as elections for regional posts, occurred June 14. Litan says the attacks were expected to lapse during the election, assuming that the Iranian government is actually funding the attacks. “We all knew they’d be back after the election,” she says. “Really, this is just business as expected.” Based on information she’s gathered from law enforcement and some of the attacked banks, Litan concludes: “We know it’s Iran because the attacks have been traced back to them, through the files, through the servers.” Is There a Criminal Connection? But could there be a criminal element involved? Many experts say a connection to organized crime is possible, because the attackers waging these long-term, extensive DDoS strikes are likely getting funding from a nefarious source. But are there clues al-Qassam is waging its attacks for a criminal purpose? Brobot, al-Qassam’s botnet, keeps growing, experts say. While the attacks waged by Brobot have been unsuccessful at causing any significant online outages during the third and fourth phases, al-Qassam has continued to increase the botnet’s size. Why? Some argue the purpose is to rent out Brobot for a profit – perhaps to cybercrime rings. And attacks linked to Brobot this campaign may support the notion that Brobot is now being used by more than just al-Qassam. During the afternoon hours of July 30, Brobot was used to attack merchant sites, seemingly as a coding test for the attacks that kicked off July 31, says Mike Smith of the cybersecurity firm Akamai, which has been tracking and mitigating DDoS activity linked to al-Qassam. The only commonality among the July 30 targets: They all have the word “Da Vinci” in their website URLs, Smith and others confirmed. “There was no connection to banking at all,” Smith says. Source: http://www.govinfosecurity.com/analysis-whos-really-behind-ddos-a-5966

View article:
Analysis: Who’s Really Behind DDoS?

DDoS attacks getting bigger but shorter in duration

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are getting bigger, but their duration are getting shorter, according to an analysis released this week by Arbor Networks. During the first six months of 2013, the average size of DDoS attacks remained solidly over the 2Gbps, Arbor reported — something the company has never seen before. Although the average may have been skewed during the period by the massive attack on Spamhaus in March, which reached 300Gbps at its zenith, large attacks in general have been going up too, Arbor found. From January to June this year, it said attacks exceeding 20Gbps more than doubled over 2012. Several security experts agreed with Arbor’s analysis. Michael Smith, CSIRT director for Akamai Technologies, cited two factors affecting DDoS numbers during the period. “It’s just easier to do these days,” he said in an interview. “You can rent a botnet for $20.” He added that a hacktivist group known as the Izz ad-Dim al-Qassam Cyber Fighters (QCF) has adopted a strategy that is also driving up the raw number of attacks and depressing their duration. “They attack multiple targets during the course of a day,” Smith explained. Not only do they attack multiple sites, but they don’t prolong an attack if they don’t see immediate results. “They’ll move from target to target after 10 or 20 minutes until they find one they can cause an immediate impact on,” Smith noted. Attacks are becoming bigger because hackers have more resources to mount attacks than ever before, said Marc Gaffan, founder of Incapsula. “There’s more ammunition for hackers in the wild which is why attacks have grown in size,” he said. New techniques have also contributed to the size of the attacks. For example, in the Spamhaus attack, hackers exploited openings in DNS servers to amplify the magnitude of their attacks on the website. They do that by sending a request to a server with an open DNS resolver. In the request, they spoof the address of their target so when the server answers the request, it sends its answer to the target. “When the resolver sends back the answer, which is larger than the question, it’s amplifying the attacker’s request,” Gaffan said. “Sometimes the answer can be as much as 50 times larger than the request,” he continued. “So an attack can be 50 times the original firepower used for the request.” In addition to improving their techniques, hackers have also increased their efficiencies by shortening their attacks. They will hit a site long enough to bring it down, disappear into the ether, then return to take it down again just as it’s recovering from the initial attack. “When a website goes down, it takes time to bring it back up,” Gaffan said. “There’s no point continuing to fire at that target when it’s down. You want to conserve your ammunition and fly under the radar, because the more you fire the greater the chances of someone identifying you as the source of the fire.” The technique also allows the attackers to get better mileage from their resources. “They could hit multiple targets with a single piece of infrastructure as opposed to hitting one target for an hour,” Gaffan said. Part of the reason attackers are sharpening their skills of deception is that defenders are getting better at blunting DDoS attacks. “The Internet as a whole is getting better at responding to these attacks,” said Cisco Technical Leader for Threat Research, Craig Williams. “We’ve seen DNS amplification shoot through the roof, but I suspect that’s going to start dropping with the addition of RPZs that can mitigate queries and people getting better at closing down open resolvers,” Williams told CSOonline . Source: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/073113-ddos-attacks-getting-bigger-but-272389.html?page=2

Taken from:
DDoS attacks getting bigger but shorter in duration

DDoS is Back; 3 Banks Attacked

A week after the self-proclaimed hacktivist group Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters announced plans to launch a fourth phase of attacks against U.S. banks it’s still not clear whether the group has resumed its distributed-denial-of-service activity. DDoS attacks appear to have targeted three banks July 24 through July 27, according to Keynote, an online and mobile cloud testing and traffic monitoring provider, and other sources. But security vendors that track attacks linked to al-Qassam’s botnet, known as Brobot, say they’re uncertain exactly who was behind those attacks. While some attack evidence suggested a link to Brobot, nothing was definitive. The online banking sites of JPMorgan Chase, U.S. Bancorp and Regions Financial Corp. all experienced intermittent outages last week, Keynote says, and the outages appear to be DDoS-related. All three banking institutions have previously been targeted by al-Qassam. Those three banks all declined to comment about the outages, although Chase did acknowledge intermittent online issues July 24 on Twitter , in response to customer complaints. Detecting those online glitches, however, took some digging, says Aaron Rudger, Keynote’s Web performance marketing manager. The online traffic patterns were different from what Keynote has recorded in the past for activity believed to be related to DDoS, he says. “Normally with DDoS attacks, we see a ramping decline in a site’s performance as the load against it builds,” Rudger says. “Eventually, the site falls over when overwhelmed.” But in all three online outages tracked last week, that pattern was not present, he says. “It seems they were hit very hard, very fast – so fast, our agents did not observe the typical ‘ramping’ effect of an attack,” he says. The pattern divergence could signal a different type of DDoS approach, or merely be a byproduct of the steps the affected banking institutions were taking to mitigate their outages, or a combination of the two, he says. And while all three banks suffered slightly different types of attacks – Chase hit by DNS lookup errors, U.S. Bank hit by TCP connection errors and Regions hit by traffic that allowed access to its homepage but kept eBanking inaccessible – Rudger says they all were, at least in part, linked to external issues. Bot Activity The outages linked to Chase began during the morning of July 24, stopped and then picked back up in the afternoon, says one DDoS mitigation expert, who asked to remain anonymous. The first wave of attacks had no commands linked to Brobot, but the second wave did, the source says. The outages at U.S. Bank, which began during the very early morning hours of July 24, also stopped for a while and picked back up in the afternoon, Rudger says. And the outages at Regions showed similar patterns, though the outages spanned two days and eBanking remained inaccessible throughout the duration, he adds. John LaCour, CEO of cybersecurity and intelligence firm PhishLabs, declined to comment about any particular banks affected by DDoS activity, but he confirmed that his company had tracked new attacks. He did not say, however, if those attacks were linked to Brobot. Tracking Attacks Several other DDoS mitigation providers would not comment about last week’s three apparent DDoS attacks. But the anonymous source says no one is certain whether al-Qassam is connected to those attacks. After al-Qassam’s announcement that it planned to launch a fourth phase of attacks, copycats may have decided to take advantage, launching attacks of their own hoping to be mistaken as al-Qassam, the source says. The group hasn’t attacked since the first week of May, when it announced it was halting its DDoS strikes in honor of Anonymous’ Operation USA , bringing an end to its third phase of attacks, which began March 5 (see New Wave of DDoS Attacks Launched ). al-Qassam has repeatedly stated it’s waging its attacks against U.S. banking institutions in protest of a Youtube movie trailer deemed offensive to Muslims. “Other DDoS actors have started their hostilities, trying to blame (or at least be confused with) them on QCF,” the source says. “We saw similar activity from the middle of Phase 2 onward, where fraudsters were attacking known [Operation] Ababil targets in order to straphang on the chaos that QCF was bringing.” Several security vendors tracking the group’s Brobot say that the botnet is growing. “The huge number of servers controlled by the attackers shows that this campaign was fully planned, intentionally organized and deliberate,” says Frank Ip, vice president of U.S. operations for NSFOCUS, which tracks DDoS activity. “This leads us to wonder whether the attack campaign is supported or backed by a country or financially well-off organization behind the scenes. We expect that similar DDoS attack events will occur in the wake of the recent activity, employing more diversified and varying methods.” Source: http://www.govinfosecurity.com/ddos-back-3-banks-attacked-a-5951/p-2

Visit site:
DDoS is Back; 3 Banks Attacked

Regions Bank Hit with New DDoS Attack

Regions Bank was the victim of cyber attackers that shuttered the bank’s website and interrupted its customers’ debit cards, reported AL.com. The bank’s website was hit Friday with a distributed-denial-of-service attack. Customers may have also not been able to use their debit cards at ATMs and merchants, according to a statement released to the website. “Access to regions.com and online banking were disrupted intermittently today by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack,” a spokesman told AL.com on Friday. “Some customers may have also been unable to use their CheckCards at ATMs or at merchants. We apologize for the difficulties this has caused and are working to resolve the issues as quickly as possible.” The attack comes on the heels of recent threats by from the hactivist group Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters. Since last September, al-Qassam has taken responsibility for a series of cyber assaults that have plagued some of the nation’s largest banks — shuttering the online banking operations of Wells Fargo, PNC and dozens of others. Regions Bank was among those hit in early October. The Regions outage and debit card issues that occurred Friday reportedly lasted for nearly two hours. Source: http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_145/regions-bank-hit-with-new-ddos-attack-1060942-1.html

Read more here:
Regions Bank Hit with New DDoS Attack

DDoS: Lessons From U.K. Attacks

While U.S. banking institutions brace for the next wave of distributed-denial-of-service attacks by Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, new cyberthreat research reminds us that no industry or global market is immune to DDoS. A new study from online security provider Neustar shows that DDoS attacks are up in the United Kingdom, just as they are in the U.S., and they’re targeting everything from e-commerce sites to government. It’s not just banking institutions that DDoS attackers want to take down – a truth we’ve been preaching for several months. But now, data proves it. Of the 381 U.K. organizations polled between May and June by Neustar, 22 percent said they suffered from some type of DDoS attack in 2012. By comparison, a survey of 704 North American organizations released in April 2012 showed that 35 percent had been targeted by DDoS within the last year. While the financial services sector has been the primary DDoS target in the U.S., telecommunications companies are the No. 1 target in the U.K., according to the Neustar survey, with 53 percent reporting attacks. Half of U.K. e-commerce companies and 43 percent of online retailers surveyed reported attacks. But only 17 percent of the U.K. financial-services organizations say they had been targeted, compared with 44 percent in the North American survey. The North American data is a bit out of date, so the percentage of financial institutions hit by DDoS is now probably even higher. And attacks aimed at U.K. organizations have been nowhere as fierce as those waged against U.S. banks since September 2012. More Attacks on Way Now that al-Qassam has just announced plans for a fourth phase of attacks, we’re all bracing for more strikes against U.S. banks (see DDoS: Attackers Announce Phase 4 ). But the new survey sends a clear message: No organization is safe from DDoS. “As in North America, U.K. companies face serious challenges as they decide on DDoS protection and attempt to mitigate losses,” Neustar writes in its survey study. “While many companies are hoping traditional defenses will suffice, given the frequency of attacks, their growing complexity and the impact when sites go dark, such hopes are badly misplaced.” U.K. organizations could learn quite a bit from the example U.S. banks have set. Experts have noted time and time again that European banks and others are not well-prepped for DDoS. Despite the fact that the attacks waged against U.S. banks have been among the largest the industry has ever seen, the percentage of U.S. organizations that experienced extended outages was much smaller than that of U.K. organizations, the surveys showed. The defenses U.S. banking institutions have put in place have set a new bar. We already knew that, but now Neustar’s survey results support it. According to Neustar, while online outages lasting about 24 hours affected about 37 percent of both North American and U.K. organizations surveyed, outages lasting more than a week affected 22 percent in the U.K. and only 13 percent in North America. Having a site down for more than a week is an embarrassment, and costly. Can you even imagine a major banking institution’s site being down that long? Banks in the U.S. are prepared for DDoS. But what about other organizations? Are non-banks getting ready for DDoS, or do they still see this as only a threat to banking institutions? What you think? Let us know in the comment section below. Source: http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/blogs/ddos-no-industry-safe-p-1524

Visit link:
DDoS: Lessons From U.K. Attacks

Four steps for denying DDoS attacks

Financial institutions have been battling waves of large distributed denial of service attacks since early 2012. Many of these attacks have been the work of a group called the Qassam Cyber Fighters, which until recently posted weekly updates on Pastebin about the reasons behind its attacks, and summarising Operation Ababil, its DDoS campaign, writes Terry Greer-King, UK managing director, Check Point ( right ). Other hacktivist groups have launched their own DDoS attacks and targeted financial services institutions with focused attacks on web forms and content. There have also been reports of nation-state organised cyber assaults on banks and government agencies, along with complex, multi-vector efforts that have combined DDoS attacks with online account tampering and fraud. These incidents against all sizes of banks have shown that there are many kinds of DDoS attacks, including traditional SYN and DNS floods, as well as DNS amplification, application layer and content targeted methods. Denial of Service (DoS) activities that have targeted SSL encrypted webpage resources and content are an additional challenge. In some instances, the adversaries have moved to a blended form of attack that incorporates harder-to-stop application layer methods alongside ‘cheap’, high-volume attacks that can be filtered and blocked through simpler means. To cope with this level of malicious activity, CIOs, CISOs, and their teams need to have a plan in place, and consider a set of defensive tools that combine on-premise technologies and cloud-based scrubbing services. They should also begin to explore and ultimately implement intelligence gathering and distribution methodologies that help lead to a comprehensive DoS mitigation strategy. Here are four steps to help in devising that strategy Have a scrubbing service or ‘cleaning provider’ to handle large volumetric attacks : the volumes associated with DDoS activity have reached a level where 80 Gbps of DDoS traffic is a normal event. There are even reports of attacks in the range of 300 Gbps. Few, if any organisations can maintain sufficient bandwidth to cope with attacks of this size. When faced with DDoS incidents this large, the first thing an organisation needs to consider is the option to route their Internet traffic through a dedicated cloud-based scrubbing provider that can remove malicious packets from the stream. These providers are the first line of defense for large volumetric attacks, as they have the necessary tools and bandwidth to clean network traffic so that DDoS packets are stopped in the cloud and regular business as usual traffic is allowed. Use a dedicated DDoS mitigation appliance to isolate and remediate attacks: the complexity of DoS attacks and the tendency to combine volumetric and application methods require a combination of mitigation methods. The most effective way to cope with the application and “low and slow” elements of these multi-vector attacks is to use an on-premise dedicated appliance. Firewalls and intrusion prevention systems are critical to the mitigation effort, and DDoS security devices provide an additional layer of defense through specialised technologies that identify and block advanced DoS activity in real-time. Administrators can also configure their on-premise solutions to communicate with cloud scrubbing service providers to enable automated route away during attack. Tune firewalls to handle large connection rates: t he firewall will also be an important piece of networking equipment during DDoS attacks. Administrators should adjust their firewall settings in order to recognise and handle volumetric and application-layer attacks. Depending on the capabilities of the firewall, protections can also be activated to block DDoS packets and improve firewall performance while under attack. Develop a strategy to protect applications from DDoS attacks: a s well as using security solutions, administrators should also consider tuning their web servers, and modifying their load balancing and content delivery strategies to ensure the best possible uptime. This should also include safeguards against multiple login attempts. Machine-led, automated activities can also be blocked by including web pages with offer details, such as opportunities for interest rate reduction or information on new products, so that users much click on “accept” or “no thanks” buttons in order to continue deeper into website content. Content analysis can also help – simple steps such as ensuring there are no large PDF files hosted on high-value servers can make a difference. The above methods are crucial to any DDoS mitigation strategy. Organisations must also reach out to service providers and ISPs and work with them to identify novel mitigation techniques. After all, DDoS attacks use the same Internet routes as bank customers, and ISPs carry both forms of traffic. Of increasing importance is the need to investigate and implement intelligence gathering and distribution strategies, both within company networks and across other companies operating in financial services. Getting more information about who the attacking agent is, the motivations behind the attack, and methods used, helps administrators anticipate and proactively architect around those attacks. Attack profile information can range from the protocols used in the attack (SYN, DNS, HTTP), the sources of attack packets, the command and control networks, and the times of day during which attacks began and ended. While valuable in mitigating attacks, there is no easy way to communicate this data, and regulatory hurdles make it even more difficult to share attack information. Right now, information-sharing consists of friends talking to friends. Information sharing needs to evolve into an automated system where multiple organisations can log in to a solution and see correlated and raw log data that provide clues about current and older attacks. Such systems could also be used to share attack intelligence and distribute protections. An industry information sharing capability would help elevate financial services companies’ abilities to cope with DDoS activity and bring the industry as a whole to a new level of preparedness. Source: http://www.bankingtech.com/154272/four-steps-for-denying-ddos-attacks/

Excerpt from:
Four steps for denying DDoS attacks

Network Solutions restores service after DDoS attack

Network Solutions said Wednesday it has restored services after a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack knocked some websites it hosts offline for a few hours. The company, which is owned by Web.com, registers domain names, offers hosting services, sells SSL certificates and provides other website-related administration services. Network Solutions wrote on Facebook around mid-day Wednesday EDT that it was under attack. About three hours later, it said most customer websites should resolve normally. Some customers commented on Facebook, however, that they were still experiencing downtime. Many suggested a problem with Network Solutions’ DNS (Domain Name System) servers, which are used to look up domain names and translate the names into an IP addresses that can be requested by a browser. DDoS attacks are a favored method to disrupt websites and involve sending large amounts of data in hopes of overwhelming servers and causing websites to not respond to requests. Focusing DDoS attacks on DNS servers has proven to be a very effective attack method. In early June, three domain name management and hosting providers — DNSimple, easyDNS and TPP Wholesale — reported DNS-related outages caused by DDoS attacks. Hosting service DNSimple said it came under a DNS reflection attack, where DNS queries are sent to one party but the response is directed to another network, exhausting the victim network’s bandwidth. Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2044618/network-solutions-restores-service-after-ddos-attack.html

Continue Reading:
Network Solutions restores service after DDoS attack

Many online newspapers become DDoS victims

At 4.11 pm of July 7, when accessing Dan Tri newspaper at dantri.com.vn, readers would see the words “Ban hay thuc hien phep tinh de tiep tuc su dung bao Dan Tri” showing that the access was denied. Dan Tri was just one of the many online newspapers hacked in recent days under a large scale DDoS offensive of the hackers. The hacking made a lot of newspapers inaccessible. Some readers still could access websites, but they had to try many times and wait with patience. Internet security experts have commented that the attack might have been well prepared for a long time, because it was conducted in a very methodical way. HVAOnline, a security forum, reported that since July 4, Thanh Nien, Tuoi tre, Dan Tri, VietNamNet, Kenh 14 have been the victims of the DDoS attacks, noting that the number of hacked online newspapers is on the rise. It is estimated that each of the newspapers incur the DDoS attack capacity of 50-70 Mbps, while the capacity was up to 1.3 Gbps for some newspapers. To date, some newspapers have fixed the problems, but the access remains unstable. According to Vo Do Thang, Director of Athena, an Internet security training center in HCM City, the current attack power would be unbearable to the small online newspapers. As such, the hacking would cause serious consequences, especially if it lasts for a long time. The experts said hackers purposely attacked the server of VDC 2 (the Vietnam Data communication Company) where the servers of many online newspapers are located. As a result, not only the VDC 2’s server, but the newspapers’ servers also suffered. HVAOnline said the forum itself and many other forums, information portals in Vietnam also incurred many DDoS attacks, but at weaker intensity. In fact, experts said the attacks began in June 2013 already at low intensity, which could be the preparation for the “general offensive” in July. They believe that the hackers may belong to a big and powerful organization to be able to mobilize such large botnets and zombies for the large scale attack. The hackers reportedly timed their attacks in their way. After finishing one attack aiming to one goal, they began the attack to another goal. After that, they unexpectedly returned and attacked the first aiming point. This way of hacking might make readers and the newspapers’ administrators misunderstand that the newspapers got troubles, while they did not think of a DDoS attack. Buu Dien newspaper on July 11 quoted the Director of an Internet security firm as saying that the firm, after analyzing the attack, found out that the attack was originated from an IP in Vietnam. BKAV’s Nguyen Minh Duc said two days ago that BKAV has not received any request for help from the hacked newspapers. A Symantec’s report in 2011 said that Vietnam has become the favorite space of the world’s hackers, and that it is the biggest botnet in the world. One of the reasons behind this is that Vietnamese don’t install anti-virus software on their computers, and they have the habit of installing cracked software pieces, or downloading some software products from unreliable websites. Source: http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/science-it/79186/many-online-newspapers-become-ddos-victims.html

See more here:
Many online newspapers become DDoS victims