mysterious | DDoSInfo – Information about DDoS and Denial of Service Attacks

Infected vending machines and light bulbs teach establishment a lesson. A PLACE WHERE late stage teenagers go to drink and make arses of themselves has fallen victim to a denial of service (DDoS) attack of, essentially, it’s own making. Yeah, we are talking about a university. We do not know what university it is, but Verizon’s breach report for 2016 tells us that the mysterious educational establishment, probably in the US, was taken to its knees by a DDoS attack that was brought about by its own bloody Internet of Things (IoT) devices. It’s kinda like that Mirai thing, but on a much smaller, and more personally embarrassingly scale. We like to imagine that a connected toaster and a connected fridge had a fallout and that everything when bits up. According to Bleeping Computer, which has had a cheeky look at the Verizon report, it was a bit more pedestrian than that. “The DDoS attack was caused by an unnamed IoT malware strain that connected to the university’s smart devices, changed their default password, and then launched brute-force attacks to guess the admin credentials of nearby devices,” Verizon says as it explained that something fishy went down. “Hacked devices would start an abnormally high level of DNS lookups that flooded the university’s DNS server, which in turn resulted in the server dropping many DNS requests, including legitimate student traffic. The university’s IT team said that many of these rogue DNS requests were related to seafood-related domains.” The university has placed all IoT devices, such as light bulbs and vending machines, on its separate subnet, or perhaps in a bin. The security industry reckons that this is a signal of the kind of unprotected troubles to come. Naturally. “On the surface this appears to be more of a prank than a sophisticated denial of service attack. However, proving that largescale IoT takeovers are possible should be a wakeup call to those who manage networks rife with unsecure IoT devices,” said Stephen Gates, chief research intelligence analyst at NSFOCUS by way of introduction. “Municipal, Industrial, Commercial, and now Educational infrastructures are becoming more and more vulnerable, because organisations often carelessly deploy IoT without understanding the ramifications of weak IoT security. “In this case the damage appears to be limited, and only inconvenienced users on a campus network. Do the same to a transportation system, a chemical plant, a hospital complex, an E911 system, or an ISP, and the damage could be much, much greater.” Source: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3004579/university-suffers-ddos-attack-after-its-schooled-by-own-iot-devices#

Link:
University suffers DDoS attack after it’s schooled by own IoT devices

AS VOTES are counted and polls close across America, security experts have warned that hackers could disrupt the presidential election process. “Anything that unsettles the election process would be a complete disaster,” explained Stephen Gates, chief research intelligence analyst at security specialist NSFOCUS. “Misinformation on exit polls, widespread internet and media outages, and delays in reporting could seriously impact people’s desire to vote and even worse — trust the results.” Mr Gates pointed to the mysterious cyber attacks that recently snarled East Coast Web traffic as evidence of hackers’ ability to cause disruption. A number of major sites including Twitter, Netflix, Spotify and Reddit were impacted by the October 21 distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS), on internet services company Dyn. DDoS attacks, which often occur when a hacker “floods” a network with information, are a popular method for disrupting websites and services. Mr Gates warned that, in addition to large DDoS attacks on internet infrastructure, online news and media outlets, attackers could target voter registration systems by launching smaller attacks on individual polling centres. “Many of these verification systems are likely online and need to access state databases where voter registration and verification is required to cast a vote,” he said. “Attacks against registered voter databases themselves would also be highly likely.” DDoS attacks and bogus election posts could also flood social media sites and spread misinformation, he warned, noting that so-called ‘man-in-the-middle’ attacks against polling centres as they report their final numbers to collection centres are also possible. In a man-in-the-middle attack a hacker secretly intercepts, and potentially alters, information as it is sent between two parties. Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates, also sees a potential DDoS threat. “I have considered it a real possibility, not only are the cyber tools available, but the motivation is there as well, from anyone — they could be state actors, they could be malicious hackers.” Hackers, for example, could use the internet of Things, where even household devices are web-enabled, as a launch pad for their attacks, according to Mr Kay. The analyst, however, notes that major DDoS attacks are difficult for hackers to sustain, and also cites the low-tech nature of some US election infrastructure. “If you look at the safety of the democratic structure, there’s all these decentralised activities, many of which are paper[-based].” Nonetheless, a Department of Homeland Security report obtained by FoxNews.com warns that parts of America’s election infrastructure are vulnerable to cyber attack. While the risk to computer-enabled election systems varies from county to county, targeted attacks against individual voter registration databases are possible, it said. One technology being touted as a potential solution to cyber threats and voter fraud is blockchain. Blockchain, which uses a decentralised security protocol, could be used to safely record and transmit votes. Because blockchain messages are distributed and not kept in one central location, they are very difficult to tamper with, say experts. “The technology could be used to prevent voter fraud (e.g., multiple votes by a single person) through use of private keys for each voter and storage of votes on an immutable blockchain ledger,” Joe Guagliardo, chair of the Blockchain Technology Group at law firm Pepper Hamilton, in an email to FoxNews.com. “Once the vote has been cast and verified, it cannot be changed without verification by all of the nodes in the network (potentially millions or more) — fraudulent activity would require computational power to overcome the resources of the collective nodes in the net.” Source: http://www.ntnews.com.au/technology/how-hackers-could-wreak-havoc-on-the-us-election/news-story/4f732c684f8f14eeee46e82641bcd5f8

More:
How hackers could wreak havoc on the US election