Tag Archives: var-username

Anonymous vs ISIS, Australian attorney general, NTP and DDoS exploits

Anonymous vs ISIS Naturally, even cybersecurity news in this past week has centred around ISIS in the wake of the Paris attacks. The main headline has come from Anonymous, who have again but more formally waged ‘war’ on ISIS themselves. So far their efforts seem to have focused on communication; deleting thousands of Twitter accounts they believe are associated with the terrorist group. One notable aspect of how ISIS recruit supporters is through social media such as Twitter and Facebook, with an estimated 46,000 affiliated Twitter accounts. The move by Anonymous was announced immediately after ISIS dubbed the group ‘idiots’ and began circulating some useless cybersecurity advice to its followers via messaging app Telegram. Anonymous’s efforts, dubbed #OpParis are likely to irritate the group and possibly damage their recruitment opportunities. Australian attorney general warns terrorism means privacy will suffer Australian Attorney General George Brandis has said that Australians should expect ‘greater impediments to personal privacy’ in the wake of the Paris attacks. Measures have already become more strict under his tenure, with legislation passed to collect call records, IP addresses, location and billing information but it remains to be seen what further changes might be made. He also said during the interview by Nine Network that the situation with ISIS was tantamount to war. UK warns terrorists are targeting hospitals, power stations and air traffic control In an address at GCHQ (Government Communication Headquarters, a branch of British intelligence), chancellor George Osborne warned that terrorists will also be making efforts to target national infrastructure in order to carry out attacks. He also said that the government intend to double cybersecurity spending over the next five years. While we know such attacks are possible, we are yet to see terrorist groups like ISIS leverage this type of capability. NTP being made more secure to avoid DDoS exploits A new beta version of the Network Time Protocol (NTPsec) has been released, in efforts to avoid exploitation in DDoS attacks. Currently only available for open source use and feedback, the protocols codebase has been greatly streamlined; reduced from 30,000 lines of code to just 884. One of the project’s lead developers Eric S Raymond said: ‘The most important change you can’t see is that the code has been very seriously security-hardened, not only by plugging all publicly disclosed holes but by internal preventive measures to close off entire classes of vulnerabilities.’ Hackers offer 200,000 Comcast user passwords for sale Hackers have offered 200,000 Comcast user passwords for sale on the dark web, leading to a mass password reset from the company. What’s interesting in this case is that this was not a breach, but the result of users being duped into revealing their passwords themselves. Fortunately, Comcast’s own security officer discovered the passwords up for sale and initiated the mass reset before any accounts were known to be exploited. A reminder to be more careful with our password management! Vodafone reveal breach as further arrests made in TalkTalk case In the wake of the large TalkTalk breach and as a third man was arrested in the case, Vodafone announced their own breach. Affecting just 1827 users, who have all since been informed, Vodafone have not revealed how the attack was carried out. The number of customers affected by the TalkTalk breach has now been revised; originally given as 4 million, the number is now down to 1.2 million. In addition to usernames, emails and passwords 21,000 of these included bank account details and 28,000 credit card details. Source: https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/in-the-headlines-anonymous-vs-isis-australian-attorney-general-ntp-and-ddos-exploits/

Follow this link:
Anonymous vs ISIS, Australian attorney general, NTP and DDoS exploits

Bloggers Put Bounty on DDoS Extortionists

Two sister blogs, Hacked (Security & Tech) and CryptoCoinsNews, have decided to go the Mel Gibson route (“Ransom” movie reference for the uncool kids) and put out a bounty on DDoS attackers instead of paying the money they were asking for. It all started earlier this morning, when both sites saw a serious DDoS attack being carried out against their server infrastructure. Three hours after the attack began, the two received emails from a man named Jon. The attacker claimed to own a botnet that he intended to use for DDoS attacks. He said that currently he was using only 20% of the botnet’s capabilities against the two sites. Jon was asking for a 2 Bitcoin ransom, which would become 3 Bitcoin by tomorrow if unpaid. Instead of giving in and being intimidated by the attacker, the two sites ramped up their DDoS mitigation and decided to put out a 5 Bitcoin ransom on the attacker, which is about $1,600 or €1,500 in today’s exchange rate. Turning the table on DDoS extortionists “If you can help us identify the extortionists in a way that leads to a successful police report, you will receive five bitcoins, with gratitude,” says Samburaj Das of CCN and Hacked. The bloggers are looking for data like real names, addresses, and attacks carried out on other sites that would allow investigators to track their DDoS campaign. Details should be sent to crypto@cryptocoinsnews.com. Only last month something similar happened to ProtonMail, a crypto email service. The site was under a massive DDoS attack, which also expanded to its ISP. Due to peer pressure from other affected services, ProtonMail paid the ransom , but the attacks never stopped, with other groups also taking aim at their infrastructure. Many people skewered ProtonMail’s owners for paying the attackers, saying it was a bad idea and did nothing but encourage such types of groups to carry on with their DDoS-for-Bitcoin extortion campaigns . We’ll just have to wait and see how Hacked/CCN’s countermove goes through. Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/bloggers-put-bounty-on-ddos-extortionists-496586.shtml

See the article here:
Bloggers Put Bounty on DDoS Extortionists

To the IT Security Rescue: DARPA and the Extreme DDoS Defence Program

IT security is a big deal – especially today with concerns that the government may be compromising some private networks. We know that the agency has compromised Google and Yahoo! in the past. Today, the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is working to fight against certain kinds of security breaches. On the surface of it, it seems contradictory, since DARPA is a branch of the U.S. Department of Defence. But, here’s a deeper look into the agency, and what they’re doing and why. DDoS Attacks and Why They’re Important A DDoS attack is a special type of DOS attack, commonly called a “Distributed Denial of Service” attack. It’s an attempt to bring down a network using multiple compromised systems, which are usually infected with malware or a virus – usually a trojan. The point of a denial of service attack is to make so many requests from the server that it can’t keep up, and crashes – taking the site or network offline. A distributed attack means that multiple computers are making requests for information or data from the server. And, because they are spread out, it’s very difficult to stop. It’s difficult to distinguish between legitimate users and attackers because, often, innocent computers are hijacked in the attack and made to look like legitimate users. Security companies that specialize in this type of threat know how to deal with them. And, you can visit this website if you want to know more about how detection and analysis works from inside the industry – including the concept of “white hat hacking” or “penetration testing.” Option One: Self-Defence Tactics One option commonly employed by companies and organizations in the past was a homebrew self-defence strategy. This is the simplest way to defend against an attack, but it’s also a method that’s a bit outdated. Usually, a coder or in-house IT employee would write some Python script that would filter out bad traffic. Sometimes, enterprises would use existing firewalls to block malicious traffic. In the early 2000s, this was a simple affair. Today, attacks are fairly complex and, while it’s simple to write a script, it doesn’t work nearly as well as it used to. A firewall will quickly be overloaded under the mildest of today’s DDoS attacks. Option Two: Specialized Equipment Defence Another option is to use specialized equipment to defend your company or organization. It’s a similar approach to the DIY method in that an enterprise is doing all of the work to stop an attack. However, instead of relying on scripts and firewalls, the business buys and deploys dedicated DDoS mitigation hardware. The hardware sits in a company’s data centre in front of the standard servers and routers. It’s made specifically to detect and filter malicious traffic. Companies that use this approach face multiple challenges. First, the hardware is costly. And, if the company isn’t under attack, the devices are just sitting there, collecting dust. They can also be expensive to operate. You need skilled network and security people to run them. They have to be constantly updated by your operations and IT team if you want protection against the latest threats. DDoS tactics change on a daily basis. And, finally, the Achilles heel of the hardware is that they can’t handle volumetric attacks. All an attacker has to do is figure out your maximum bandwidth and exceed it. Option Three: ISP Defence Most companies outsource their DDoS mitigation. Some enterprises use their ISP to provide the service. An ISP can have more bandwidth than a single company would, which helps with large attacks. But, there are still problems with this approach. The most obvious is that ISPs aren’t in the business of threat detection and mitigation. They sell bandwidth. So, their systems might not actually be very good at detecting and defending against a well-orchestrated (or even not-so-well orchestrated) attack. Option Four: Cloud Mitigation Provider This option essentially outsources the problem to a company that specializes in cloud services. Cloud mitigation providers are experts when it comes to providing DDoS mitigation from the cloud. In other words, these companies have built out massive network resources. They have more bandwidth capabilities than your average hosting provider or cloud storage vendor, and they can mitigate the threat of an attack at multiple sites around the Internet. Basically, they redistribute the bad traffic that comes in to lessen its effects. In many cases, there is no effect. They can scrub traffic for you, and send only the “clean” traffic to your data centre. One major reason you’d want to hire these people is for their expertise. They usually have network and security engineers and researchers on staff that are monitoring the latest threats and tactics hackers use so that customers are well-protected. They also have bandwidth – lots of it. They provide more bandwidth than an enterprise could ever hope to provision on its own. This is effective in stopping even the largest of attacks. They have multiple types of DDoS mitigation hardware. Since DDoS attacks are very complex, there’s an inherent need for multiple layers of filtering to keep up with the latest threats. Cloud providers use multiple technologies, including their own proprietary technology to defend against attacks. Source: http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/to-the-it-security-rescue-darpa-and-the-extreme-ddos-defence-program-68380/

More here:
To the IT Security Rescue: DARPA and the Extreme DDoS Defence Program

15-Year-Old Brit Charged with DDoS Attacks, Bomb Threats

British police have arrested and charged a 15-year-old teenager from Plympton, Plymouth. The boy was taken into custody at his parents’ house on Monday, November 16. According to police reports, the teen hacker launched several DDoS attacks from his home against companies and servers in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America. Additionally, the hacker also made several bomb threats against North American airlines. He used social media to deliver his warnings. Because he’s a minor, the Devon & Cornwall Police did not reveal his name, but the youngster was freed on bail by his parents and will face a judge before Plymouth Youth Court on Friday, December 18. Official charges have been brought against the teenager under the Section 51 of the Criminal Law Act (two offenses for the bomb threats) and Section 3 of the Computer Misuse Act (three offenses for the DDoS attacks). Previously, UK police had arrested several teens in connection with the high-profile TalkTalk data breach . This is an unrelated case but still raises questions about the UK youth’s predilection to cyber-crime. With so many hacking tools available online, many teens find it extremely easy to launch large-scale attacks on “anyone who annoys them.” Things may have been made worse yesterday, when, in an attempt to increase attacks on ISIS members, the Anonymous hacktivism group published a noob’s guide to hacking . Source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/15-year-old-brit-charged-for-ddos-attacks-bomb-threats-496420.shtml

More:
15-Year-Old Brit Charged with DDoS Attacks, Bomb Threats

UK Broadband Provider AAISP Suffers Strong DDoS Assault

Internet provider Andrews and Arnold (AAISP) appears to have become the target for a semi-sporadic Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assault, which began hitting their network yesterday and has caused some of their customers to lose connection. Generally speaking DDoS attacks work by overloading a target server (e.g. a website or other network service) with masses of data requests from multiple internet connected computers / devices; usually Trojan/Virus infected computers that then become part of a botnet , which can be controlled by a single individual that usually hides their connection behind other servers. At this point it’s crucial to reflect that DDoS attacks happen to ISPs all the time (we read about them on an almost weekly basis), they’re practically par-for-the-course, but most can be mitigated and few are ever significant enough to knock lots of end-users offline. In nearly all cases these incidents aren’t actually an attack against the ISP, but rather somebody targeting a specific customer on the ISPs network. As such this should NOT be confused with the recent TalkTalk incident, which also involved a separate hacking attempt and was aimed at the ISPs web server. By comparison the assault against AAISP appears to have targeted part of their network and NOT their website, which is usually what happens when somebody is looking to knock a specific subscriber offline. The nature of this assault, which seems both powerful and aimed at several areas of their network, meant that AAISP’s “ usual anti-DOS systems have not helped “, although they were later able to “ mitigated most of the problems. ” Unfortunately the assault began again this morning and moved to a new target block, which has kept AAISP’s staff on their toes. Adrian Kennard, Director of AAISP, told ISPreview.co.uk: “ Staff have been working on this to reduce the impact on all customers as much as possible, and are continuing to do so today. There are still a handful customers that are collateral damage from the attack and we are working on getting those customers on line right now .” Apparently “ many ” of AAISPs customers have been affected by the DDoS, although only a handful were actually left without Internet connectivity and the provider is now attempting to identify which customers were being targeted by the assault (in practice they may not get to the bottom of this, just as most other ISPs rarely do). In the meantime some of provider’s customers are having their WAN IP address changed to get them on-line, including a few that own blocks of IPs (this can sometimes be a bit more tricky for the customer). One of those is Basingstoke based fixed wireless broadband ISP HiWiFi, which has been tweeting about the incident since last night. It’s worth pointing out that the Computer Misuse Act effectively makes DDoS illegal, although finding the perpetrators is rather more difficult, not least because such attacks are usually short-lived (the longer they go on the greater the chance of being traced and caught). Source: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2015/11/uk-broadband-provider-aaisp-suffers-strong-ddos-assault.html

Continued here:
UK Broadband Provider AAISP Suffers Strong DDoS Assault

UK pummelled with DDoS after ISIS cyber attack warning

Earlier this week, the UK government warned ISIS militants were developing the capability to launch cyber attacks against Britain’s infrastructure. Today, we are witnessing a huge amount of DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks on the United Kingdom. As of writing, a look at the Digital Attack Map shows an unprecedented amount of attack traffic aiming towards the UK. Most of the DDoS attacks use “fragmentation” which sends a flood of TCP or UDP fragments to a victim, overwhelming the victim’s ability to re-assemble the streams and severely reducing performance. The cyber attacks come after a week of physical attacks towards the international community, and subsequent retaliation in the form of bombing campaigns against key IS targets in Syria and hundreds of raids on various safe houses being used to harbor the militants in France and Belgium. It’s unclear what the attack traffic is targeting, and whether it’s originating from IS sympathasisers, but online activist group Anonymous has been under attack for declaring war on the militants with the launch of their #OpParis campaign for anyone to disrupt social network accounts used for propaganda and recruitment by the group. An IRC used by Anonymous has temporarily had to shut-off external connections from third-party clients. #OpParis is not “hacking” in the traditional sense, as the group is often known for, in fact its rules prohibit carrying out certain attacks such as DDoS and instead focuses on using software to collect the social network accounts used by ISIS. Volunteers then use the services’ built-in tools for abuse reporting. So far, #OpParis has reportedly taken down 5,500 Twitter accounts – despite not all being confirmed as being ISIS-affiliated. ISIS has used the web for international recruitment, and for encrypted communications. The actions of Anonymous has worried the group as it’s disruptive to spreading their poisonous ideology to potential new recruits, but it has also pushed the militants into using safer messaging tools and issuing advice to followers over which services to use. The potential of using these encrypted services, like Telegram, for organising attacks out the view of intelligence agencies is concerning governments. David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, has expressed his government’s interest in “banning” encrypted messaging tools which agencies struggle to intercept. Cameron’s plan has been criticised not just for its privacy implications, but also for how it would be impossible to ban such tools in practice as most of the chosen tools are “open source” and can be distributed by anyone. In response to cyber attack threats, the UK government has pledged £2 billion towards creating a “National Cyber Centre” based at GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters) Chancellor George Osborne said ISIS was trying to develop the capability to attack British infrastructure such as hospitals, power networks and air traffic control systems for lethal consequences. In a speech at GCHQ, he said “they have not been able to use it to kill people yet by attacking our infrastructure through cyber attack, but we know they want it and are doing their best to build it.” “We are building our own offensive cyber capability – a dedicated ability to counter-attack in cyberspace. When we talk about tackling (ISIS), that means tackling their cyber threat as well as their guns, bombs and knives,” he continued. It’s unclear if the cyber attacks towards the UK today are ISIS-related, but it goes to show the need for a facility dedicated towards facing cyber threats. Back in September, we reported about the creation of the Global Cyber Alliance. The alliance is headquartered in New York and London, but it’s unclear if this new investment will be an expansion of that scheme or an independent facility. Will Pelgrin, former CEO and President of the Center for Internet Security, said: “Cyber crimes have become a worldwide epidemic with estimates of a half billion global cyber victims annually. We must treat cyber security threats and crimes as we would any widespread infectious disease – immediately, urgently and collectively. Cyber risks have reached catastrophic proportions and, therefore, require an unparalleled, public/private and transnational response.” Source: http://www.telecomstechnews.com/news/2015/nov/18/uk-pummelled-ddos-after-isis-cyber-attack-warning/

Link:
UK pummelled with DDoS after ISIS cyber attack warning

Security blogger Graham Cluley’s website suffers DDoS attack

A distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS) is a cheap but effective way to take out your target’s website by flooding it with so much traffic that the web server becomes overwhelmed and the website crashes. There are those who use DDoS attacks as a kind of online protest, such as hacktivist groups like Anonymous. Then there are those who do it to “amuse” themselves, like the Lizard Squad who took out Playstation and Xbox servers on Christmas Day last year. And then there are other DDoS attacks that come from cybercriminals who don’t care about politics or hijinks – they just want money. Recently a cybergang calling itself the Armada Collective has been attempting to extort money from victims by threatening DDoS attacks unless a ransom is paid in bitcoins. One Swiss company, the encrypted webmail provider ProtonMail, recently paid $6000 in bitcoins after receiving a ransom from the Armada Collective, it said. The site was still DDoSed. And now, the latest site to fall victim to a DDoS attack is that of former Naked Security writer Graham Cluley. We don’t know why Graham was targeted, but on Twitter he noted that he didn’t receive a ransom demand, so it must have been “personal.” Unfortunately, it doesn’t take much skill to launch this kind of attack. Anybody with a little bit of money and the will to wreak havoc can launch DDoS attacks with simple DDoS-for-hire web tools that harness armies of zombified computers to bombard your website with thousands or millions of illegitimate web requests. DDoS attacks are simple but destructive – if your website goes down for any period of time, your customers can’t get through and you end up losing new sales, losing customers, or missing out on ad revenue, depending on what your website’s purpose is. In Graham’s article about how ProtonMail initially caved to the extortion demands, but then had a change of heart, Graham wrote something very sensible about how we should treat extortionists, blackmailers and ransom-takers: No-one should ever pay internet extortionists. For those who receive a ransom demand, it might seem like a few thousand dollars is a fair price to pay when your customers are complaining they can’t access your services, and your business is hurting. But if we pay the extortionists’ demands, that will only give them more reason to do it again. Source: http://www.mysec.hu/magazin/kuelfoeldi-hirek/20413-security-blogger-graham-cluley-s-website-suffers-ddos-attack

Continue reading here:
Security blogger Graham Cluley’s website suffers DDoS attack

FastMail the latest victim of a sustained DDoS offensive

FastMail has been subjected to a number of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, the premium email provider has revealed. The Australian-based company said that the cyber offensive first took place in the early hours of November 8th, which took some of its services offline. In response it immediately “enabled mitigation strategies”, which proved successful in bringing the DDoS attack to an end. However, the following day, at around the same time, the cybercriminal once again launched another onslaught. This second-round of attacks came with a ransom demand, which threatened FastMail with more chaos if it didn’t hand over 20 Bitcoins (worth approximately £7,500). The company said that it does not respond to attempts of extortion and will not bow to pressure from the cybercriminal. “Over the last week, several email providers, including Runbox, Zoho, Hushmail and ProtonMail have been hit by large scale DDoS attacks, accompanied by an extortion demand from the attacker to stop,” FastMail outlined. “The goal of the attacker is clearly to extort money in the hope that the services will not be prepared to deal with the disruption. “With one exception, where ProtonMail paid the criminals and was still attacked, we do not believe the extortion attempts have been successful, and we fully intend to stand up to such criminal behaviour ourselves.” The company says that it is actively working to keep its services running as best as possible and that it has utilized knowledge gained from past DDoS attacks to help it react to numerous situations. The attack on ProtonMail is one of the most high-profile cases of 2015, which the encrypted email provider has described as the “largest and most extensive cyberattack in Switzerland”. A DDoS attack is when numerous computers make repeated requests for information to one computer or device. This has the effect of ‘overwhelming’ a computer or device’s ability to deal with the requests, resulting in it slowing down or crashing. Source: http://www.welivesecurity.com/2015/11/12/fastmail-latest-victim-sustained-ddos-offensive/

See original article:
FastMail the latest victim of a sustained DDoS offensive

ProtonMail comes back online, shores up DDoS defenses

ProtonMail, the Switzerland-based encrypted email service, has found its footing again after a wild ride over the past week. The free service has said it was hit by two different groups using distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS) that took it offline. Now it has partnered with Radware, which offered its DDoS mitigation service for a “reasonable price,” allowing service to resume, ProtonMail wrote in a blog post on Tuesday. “The attackers hoped to destroy our community, but this attack has only served to bring us all together, united by a common cause and vision for the future,” the company wrote. The first group of attackers, which call themselves the Armada Collective, asked ProtonMail for a ransom in bitcoin before launching attacks early on Nov. 4. The Swiss Governmental Computer Emergency Response Team warned in September about blackmail attempts by the Armada Collective. They tend to launch a demo attack while demanding 10 or 20 bitcoins, and larger attacks follow if the ransom isn’t paid. Controversially, ProtonMail paid the ransom. The company wrote in a blog post that it was under pressure from other companies to pay it in order to stop the attacks. However, ProtonMail later edited the blog post, writing that paying “was clearly a wrong decision so let us be clear to all future attackers – ProtonMail will never pay another ransom.” The second group’s attack on ProtonMail had wide-ranging effects on its service providers and other companies, which also were knocked offline. The 100Gbps-attack brought down ProtonMail’s ISP, including the ISP’s routers and data center. ProtonMail suspected that the second group might be state-sponsored hackers because of the severe damage inflicted. Bizarrely, the Armada Collective told ProtonMail it wasn’t responsible for the second set of attacks. By Sunday, ProtonMail began recovering. An ISP, IP-Max, set up a direct link from ProtonMail’s data center to a major Internet connection point in Zurich in less than a day, it wrote. Level 3 Communications lent a hand with IP transit. An appeal for donations to put in better protections against DDoS has netted $50,000 so far as well. ProtonMail’s service is free, but eventually it plans to introduce paid-for premium options. ProtonMail is now using Radware’s DefensePipe, a cloud-based service. Other companies, ProtonMail said, offered their services but “attempted to charge us exorbitant amounts.” ProtonMail offers a full, end-to-end encrypted email service and has more than 500,000 users. Although it has been possible to encrypt email for decades, interest has increased since documents leaked by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden showed massive data-collection operations by western spy agencies. Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/3004157/protonmail-comes-back-online-shores-up-ddos-defenses.html

See original article:
ProtonMail comes back online, shores up DDoS defenses

A server was DDoS-ed for 320 hours straight

Kaspersky Lab has released a new report on the evolution of distributed denial of service (DDoS) and it shows some interesting figures, including the fact that a server was targeted for 320 hours straight. The Kaspersky DDoS Intelligence Report Q3 2015 is based on the constant monitoring of botnets and observing new techniques utilised by cybercriminals. It shows that DDoS attacks remain highly localised, with 91.6 per cent of the victims’ resources are located in only ten countries around the world, although Kaspersky Lab has recorded DDoS attacks targeting servers in 79 countries total. DDoS attacks are highly likely to originate from the same countries, the security firm understands, adding that China, USA and South Korea are the highest rating countries in both sources of attack and sources of targets. According to the report, more than 90 per cent of all attacks observed in the third quarter lasted less than 24 hours, but the number of attacks lasting over 150 hours has grown significantly. At the same time, there was this one server that was hit extremely hard – 22 times. It is located in The Netherlands. Kaspersky says that even cyber-crooks go on vacation, after realising that August is the quietest month of the quarter. Linux-based botnets are significant, and account for up to 45.6 per cent of all attacks recorded by Kaspersky Lab. The main reasons for this include poor protection and higher bandwidth capacity. Looking at who the most frequent victims are, banks stand out the most, being frequent targets for complex attacks and ransom demands. Source: http://www.itproportal.com/2015/11/04/a-server-was-ddos-ed-for-320-hours-straight/

Read the article:
A server was DDoS-ed for 320 hours straight